Same to you bro :) On 1 Jan 2015 05:53, "Moshe Shevel" <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Happy New Year guys, all the best for 2015! Stay safe > On 31 Dec 2014 11:04 PM, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I hope you got game because I want a ft5 against you at the session... >> On 30 Dec 2014 18:29, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> ya i dunno , it smells alot like taken. >>> >>> i dont like revenge movies. >>> >>> I watched the croods, good cartoon movie. The voice of the father >>> sounded so familiar , turns out it was nicholas cage, lol >>> >>> I lost at jhb vs cpt 5v5 in bb, i need to hold dat L. cant really talk >>> smack now in xrd thread. I just need to silently poon all. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:59:39 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail >>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> Just finished watching John Wick. The movie is kinda mediocre but the >>> action scenes are top notch. >>> On 30 Dec 2014 13:39, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Finally made SMB my bitch. They even have this helpful message at the >>> end telling you "Congrats! You have finished everying in NSMB!" >>> >>> On to Bayonetta 2 now. Man, what a game. I can see myself playing this >>> for a while. >>> >>> >>> Stupid lol of the day: >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3QcfZhYBzo&feature=youtu.be >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> *LOL* >>> >>> That Jean though... >>> >>> And Professor X looks (and sounds) like Dr. Evil *lol* >>> On 29 Dec 2014 21:02, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-iMVsi0IuY >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:59:16 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail >>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> If you want to get really technical (read: anal) you can say that you'd >>> also have to prove that married and unmarried are mutually exclusive >>> states. >>> >>> Consider polygamy: You can be married to 4 women, but then you divorce >>> 1. To unmarry someone means to undo a marriage them. So technically in >>> this case you are married and unmarried. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:30 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> lol, hadn't considered that possibility :P >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Correct, except if you use Constructive Logic. In that case you would >>> be required to prove that Alice, Bob and Charlie are indeed a married or >>> unmarried person, and you would not be able to use the Law of the Excluded >>> Middle or Double Negation. >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic >>> >>> Why is this important? Because Alice, Bob and Charlie may in fact be >>> the name of animals (not people), which would either mean the answer is >>> False or undecidable. >>> >>> But we are reasonable folk after all, so we can appeal to Occam's Razor >>> to handle that. >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:25 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, because irrespective of Alice's status the question being asked >>> will be held true for either the first or second statement. >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> By the way, here's a riddle: >>> >>> Bob is looking at Alice. Alice is looking at Charlie. Bob is married. >>> Charlie is not. >>> >>> Is a married person looking at an unmarried person? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>