Re: CTS community mail

  • From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 21:13:20 +0200

You were right about Gone Girl.  Great performance by Rosamund Pike.



On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Speaking of Taken: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1RMkMY8idI
>
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:29 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> ya i dunno , it smells alot like taken.
>>
>> i dont like revenge movies.
>>
>> I watched the croods, good cartoon movie. The voice of the father sounded
>> so familiar , turns out it was nicholas cage, lol
>>
>> I lost at jhb vs cpt 5v5 in bb, i need to hold dat L. cant really talk
>> smack now in xrd thread. I just need to silently poon all.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:59:39 +0200
>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Just finished watching John Wick. The movie is kinda mediocre but the
>> action scenes are top notch.
>> On 30 Dec 2014 13:39, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Finally made SMB my bitch.  They even have this helpful message at the
>> end telling you "Congrats!  You have finished everying in NSMB!"
>>
>> On to Bayonetta 2 now.  Man, what a game.  I can see myself playing this
>> for a while.
>>
>>
>> Stupid lol of the day:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3QcfZhYBzo&feature=youtu.be
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> *LOL*
>>
>> That Jean though...
>>
>> And Professor X looks (and sounds) like Dr. Evil *lol*
>> On 29 Dec 2014 21:02, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-iMVsi0IuY
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:59:16 +0200
>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> If you want to get really technical (read: anal) you can say that you'd
>> also have to prove that married and unmarried are mutually exclusive
>> states.
>>
>> Consider polygamy: You can be married to 4 women, but then you divorce
>> 1.  To unmarry someone means to undo a marriage them.  So technically in
>> this case you are married and unmarried.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:30 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> lol, hadn't considered that possibility :P
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Correct, except if you use Constructive Logic.  In that case you would be
>> required to prove that Alice, Bob and Charlie are indeed a married or
>> unmarried person, and you would not be able to use the Law of the Excluded
>> Middle or Double Negation.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic
>>
>> Why is this important?  Because Alice, Bob and Charlie may in fact be the
>> name of animals (not people), which would either mean the answer is False
>> or undecidable.
>>
>> But we are reasonable folk after all, so we can appeal to Occam's Razor
>> to handle that.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:25 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, because irrespective of Alice's status the question being asked will
>> be held true for either the first or second statement.
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> By the way, here's a riddle:
>>
>> Bob is looking at Alice. Alice is looking at Charlie. Bob is married.
>> Charlie is not.
>>
>> Is a married person looking at an unmarried person?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Other related posts: