RE: CTS: Community Mail

  • From: "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:33:08 +0000

So, I dunno if it was confirmed on the mails, but do we have Jeeva’s place for
Evo weekend?

From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Manase Zote
Sent: 01 July 2015 1:30 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: CTS: Community Mail

AWESOME!!!

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

https://youtu.be/9mfsdu6P7sg
On 1 Jul 2015 13:18, "sameegh jardine"
<sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Smash yo! They know how to show support.

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Ashraf Barendse
<ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Final Evo numbers
http://shoryuken.com/2015/07/01/evo-2015s-final-registration-numbers-released-see-where-your-favorite-game-stands/

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Ashraf Barendse
<ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
*tumbleweed*

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Stephen Scheidel
<gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
[cid:image001.jpg@01D0B402.75DC4AD0]


On 30 June 2015 at 22:01, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Says the outcast who will get the new Tony Hawk

-_-

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Stephen Scheidel
<gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
you guys are dik games bra.

On 30 June 2015 at 21:50, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Holy duckbills Batman!

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:47 PM, sameegh jardine
<sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
...I'm playing Hearthstone.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Trying t watch CEO matched 480p stuttering like crazy.
Looks like isp needs another call.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Stephen Scheidel
<gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
If a fat chick falls down in a forest and nobody is there do the trees still
laugh ?

On 30 June 2015 at 12:57, Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
And if its state is altered through observation, would the tree make a
different sound when observed falling or unobserved?It's a very tricky
question, to the point where it may not even make sense on the quantum scale.

Tricky question. May not even make sense at the quantum level. But
theoretically, in the layman's terms, yes it would. If the sound is a product
of the collapsed realisation of the tree, then the sound would be different.
But that's not the weirdest part. If you don't see how the tree falls but then
listen to the sound it makes afterwards, the tree would appear to retroactively
fall differently in order to accommodate the sound you hear. In other words,
suppose the tree could fall either left into the water, or right on to the
ground, the reality is that it falls in both directions till you hear the sound
it makes. And if you position yourself in a way that you can only hear the one
sound, then it will only fall on that side. So by changing the way you hear
how the tree falls, you change what happened in the past!

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
And if its state is altered through observation, would the tree make a
different sound when observed falling or unobserved?

From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Ilitirit Sama
Sent: 30 June 2015 12:29 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: CTS: Community Mail

In other news, if a tree falls in the forest and nobody observes it, does it
make a sound?
The answer is that it's a trick question. The tree exists in a superposition
of falling down and not falling down until someone sees it.*

http://www.anu.edu.au/news/all-news/experiment-confirms-quantum-theory-weirdness
*Not really, but we don't currently have the understanding to explain it in
simpler ways
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.

KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.













**********************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.

KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.

JPEG image

Other related posts: