This is interesting...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnBzIi5nchE
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:22 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
how old are these people on the council?
100?
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:10:23 +0200
Subject: Re: CTS: Community Mail
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Oh and they don't like that it games containing the words "Fighter" and
"Combat".
Lol.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Super Arcade could not get a license to operate because the Azusa City
Council members think arcades bring a bad element to the city.
Tell that to Tokyo.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'd trust your review far more than any other.
I've seen mostly negative stuff on dlc and the Batmobile, fair stuff on
everything else.
On 25 Jun 2015 08:18, "sameegh jardine" <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think that was their final score, for larger games they'll usually do a
review in progress style write up while they play through the game. I
suppose the game is relatively small compared to RPG style games so it's
pretty quick getting through the core game and a few side missions if
you're a reviewer.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
wrote:
"IGN score 9.2"
Do they do an addendum score once the entire game has been flogged ?
On 24 June 2015 at 22:53, Sameegh Jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Got some dlc, Harley's missions etc.
Will check it out after I finish the main story.
On 24 Jun 2015, at 10:37 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Did you get a physical copy with all the goodies?
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:29 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Yeah, runs beautifully on console though.
It's on par with Arkham City as far as the experience goes based on what
I've played so far.
IGN score 9.2
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So I hear Batman is rubbish on tge Master Race system.
I'm off to play DMC4se now.
On 24 Jun 2015 18:16, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gonna postpone the Wednesday sessions until after Ramadan.
On 24 Jun 2015 17:53, "Di Lhong" <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
D'vorah's nerf is odd. It didn't effect much on her block string pressure
(from +17 to +11...still makes some moves a true block string but removes
her 50/50 true block string mix up, which i don't mind. Only way to win in
50/50 true block string mix up is with armor so it's a nice bait now
too.)...but it effected her overhead f22~wasp cancel 212 combo...making it
tighter to land the 212 after f22~wasp cancel (from 6frame link to 1frame
link)...while making low b+1~wasp cancel 212 easier (it was a 1 frame link
before)
NRS is odd.
Mileena buffed again...
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here's one reason to own an Xbox One
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_Replay
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I'm out for the next few WNF's.
Watched some of Saturday's stream, when Salie and LB troll it's some next
level ish :P
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Anyone interested in a sesh tonight?
On 24 Jun 2015 11:28, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*lol*
On 24 Jun 2015 11:26, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sounds like a good balance idea.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
*Sent:* 24 June 2015 2:55 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: CTS: Community Mail
Goodbye Swarm Queen lolz
• D'Vorah - reduced the cancel advantage after Pterothorax combo (Towards
+ FP, FP, BP) by 2
• D’Vorah (Swarm Queen) - must be in the Bug Bomb held loop for 3 frames
before you can dash cancel out of it
I wonder how much this will effect the wasp cancel block string...if they
take out 2 frames and 3 frames...from +20 we're down to +15?
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hehe.
On 23 Jun 2015 16:05, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That's your problem right there. Lol
On 23 Jun 2015 15:45, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
1 is fuqn fantastic, 2 others are mediocre. THAT is their crime.
On 23 Jun 2015 15:33, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How many of them were any good because I see you play only one Hulk game?
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Incredible Hulk games for PS2/3 that came after the movie.
You know, the comic spawned the Hulk: Ultimate Destruction game, then
there was the movie with Egghead Norton, and naturally, that required a
pseudo-movie-tie-in-rush-job.
On 23 Jun 2015 14:08, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What Hulk games?
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Looking at this, why in the hell did all the other Hulk games take such
a massive leap backwards?
...and what the hell went wrong with Prototype? Where did this combat
disappear to?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rWk8X2h6Iw
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I touch nothing Kung Fury related until after EVO.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Moshe Shevel <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Has anyone played the Kung Fury: Street Rage mobile game? I can't stop
playing it, it's so awesome!
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
