I don't like the delayable wake ups, red focus attack will only buff the already strong focus attacks i.e. fei long/chun/Gen/Oni/Sakura etc. Making it absorb 2 hits, unblockable at level 2 and un-scaled damage is retarded and broken. I know chun and someone else already have a focus attack that is plus on block at level 1 while everybody else has no advantage. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:46 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > What do you guys think about the rumoured SF updates? Delayed wakeup, red > focus, dual ultra with reduced damage etc. > > They sound a bit radical imo. It's going to be difficult balancing wake-up > options while keeping vortex heavy characters relevant. I suppose they need > to give those characters more honest tools to work with if they're going to > be screwing around their current strategies. > > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:37 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> castrum was good, actually went better than expected. those 8 man dungeons >> are not that hard. >> >> last night my adobe randomly updated which caused me to lag. im ready for >> pretorium tonight. >> >> ________________________________ >> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: [CPT-RPG] Re: Stuff off >> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:34:26 +0000 >> >> >> I was lagging so hard. >> >> Game stood still for 20-30 seconds at a time. Was essentially unplayable. >> >> Guys carried me through the thing lol... Im amazed that nobody complained >> :P >> >> ________________________________ >> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: [CPT-RPG] Re: Stuff off >> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:32:35 +0000 >> >> Hey LB, how was your lag yesterday while running castrum? >> >> >> >> >> >> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets >> Sent: 23 October 2013 1:21 PM >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: [CPT-RPG] Re: Stuff off >> >> >> >> you cant play sf by making math decisions all the time.. its gna be too >> hard. >> >> you have to play by feel , since makoto relies heavily on gimmicks and >> momentum >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: [CPT-RPG] Re: Stuff off >> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:37:27 +0000 >> >> Dunno how other characters guides/info looks >> >> But that makoto rindoukan bible doc is amazing. Super usefull. >> >> >> >> Not a fan of the whole play by feel thing. I want my data. >> Need to know how or why something does or does not work before I spend >> ages trying to something by feeling it out etc. >> >> Probably different for you folks since you have way better understanding >> of how/what works due to experience etc. >> Stuff I still need to find out, you okes probably take for granted as >> basic info :P >> >> >> Im still a noob sadly >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:16:21 +0200 >> Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: [CPT-RPG] Re: Stuff off >> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Can't remember the last time I read frame data for this game. That was >> ages ago. >> >> >> >> These days, I just try to feel things out. Learning the range of normals >> and what beats what in different situations is more important to me at the >> mo. >> >> >> >> I'll be using Gouken more frequently at the sessions from now on. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Wynand-Ben Viljoen >> <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Need to check out Makoto's frames and shit again... >> >> Cant remember them now :( >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: [CPT-RPG] Re: Stuff off >> >> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:39:10 +0000 >> >> >> >> @Paas – somethings to remember: >> >> B+MK – the quick overhead kick that I was using – it’s negative on hit. >> >> With the d+mk, hado thing – the d+mk is safe. The hado is not. >> >> Tatsu – on hit: light version I recover fast. Medium version we’re both >> equal. Hard version you recover faster. >> EX – plus on hit. >> >> Probably other stuff to know, but I don’t know it. >> >> >> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben Viljoen >> Sent: 23 October 2013 10:36 AM >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: [CPT-RPG] Re: Stuff off >> >> >> >> Ken must DIE! >> >> >> > Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:33:05 +0200 >> > Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: [CPT-RPG] Re: Stuff off >> > From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > Ken is pretty cool. Just remember that fadc into ultra 1 doesn't do >> > that much damage becuase you don't get the animation. >> > doing jump in, target combo, fireball , fadc ultra 1 should do more >> > damage, but it's a bit harder. >> > >> > You should check out youtube for these players: Michael tan (sometimes >> > spelt maikeru tan), Momochi, PlayerJun52. >> > >> > I also like to check out some highlight vids just to see how much a >> > character can kick ass. >> > Here's a "best of" vid for Playerjun52 (ken) >> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTzk-N3aB1U >> > >> > and here's one for Ace Eirin (guile) >> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBjQ8Mnh_Qc >> > >> > ========================================================================= >> > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing >> > list. >> > >> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the >> >> sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are >> not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any >> action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may >> be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to >> the >> >> terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement >> letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any >> attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are >> neither >> >> given nor endorsed by it. >> >> >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, >> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, >> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG >> International”) on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. >> >> KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a >> >> Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of >> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International >> Cooperative (“KPMG International”) >> >> provides no services to clients. >> >> Each member firm of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) >> is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member >> >> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If >> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or >> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and >> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject >> to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client >> engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this >> e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of >> the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, >> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, >> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services >> to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and >> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the >> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained >> from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. > > ========================================================================You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list. //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc