RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

  • From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:44:29 +0200

Brainded you say?
I'll ave some of that.
On 21 Jan 2014 08:37, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>  So I ran the low level duty finder yesterday and got Qarn. It’s always
> worrying to see ‘some party members are new… a bonus for quick completion
> will be added’ message.
>
> The tank and one of the DPS guys was new. The other DPS guy knew what he
> was doing. I was whm.
>
> Anyways, we got through the dungeon. We had 1 wipe against the second boss
> – the golems that ignore aggro – but that’s it. I was amazed.
>
>
>
> Watched an anime last night – Freezing. It was hectically dumb. Lots of
> fanservice. I could feel my IQ dropping as I watched the show. Stock
> characters, no real surprises in the show. Sigh. I’ll probably watch the
> second season as well and regret that too.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 21 January 2014 7:55 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
> tbh
>
> smugg raped Sanford harder than Sanford raped riki.
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 23:16:36 +0200
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Wow. What are the odds?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Those match up stats aren't actual match-ups, just what the win ratio
> is on the videos they have.
>
> I hope they approve my shit. only applied for 2 days, but i
> stratgically placed them so i'm off for 5 days in a row.
>
> Oh , yes, Ice-Kun was moved to my department at work. Maybe I must
> take my stick to work. wonder if ill need to sign it in like a laptop.
>
> =========================================================================
> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
>
>   ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>

Other related posts: