Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:09:52 +0200
Never heard of it.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> My friend is telling me about a fish place called Millers thumb.
>
> Anyone here been? thoughts?
>
> On 15/01/2014, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Japanese dude called Nujabes.
> > He did all the music for samurai champloo and also has heaps if other
> > good albums/mixtapes.
> >
> > On 15/01/2014, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Who is that asian DJ, Steve?
> >>
> >> Its not actually training, Khan. Its me going to whoop SAP. hehehe.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> >> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Got Haukke on roulette. The music is uh, quite different.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
> >>> *Sent:* 15 January 2014 1:20 PM
> >>>
> >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Nope, not yet.
> >>>
> >>> Only attempted the sirius thing
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:18:26 +0000
> >>>
> >>> I don’t recall, have you run the new Haukke, Paas? It’s…fun.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> >>> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
> >>> *Sent:* 15 January 2014 1:14 PM
> >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Nah DF sucks
> >>>
> >>> Just do the new party finder thing. There are constant new groups
> >>> forming
> >>> for Titan, just keep at it there and you should find a good group
> >>> eventually.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Im back tonight so I can start gathering the rest of the Phil tomes so
> I
> >>> can create my relic.
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:09:42 +0000
> >>>
> >>> Man, Titan on DF is a joke. Played with a bunch of people using low
> >>> level
> >>> gear. We couldn’t get past the heart, despite everyone being alive
> >>> through
> >>> the whole phase. Then you get comments like ‘Wow that was so close, we
> >>> can
> >>> do this!’
> >>>
> >>> Uh, no. We didn’t have the dps to get through the heart phase, we ain’t
> >>> going to make the fight. Sigh. Stick around for another 2 tries but
> just
> >>> gets worse after that.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Oh, I didn’t realise but there is a bug with garuda. I can put the pet
> >>> on
> >>> the edge of the stage. When edge breaks, garuda just parks off past the
> >>> edge of the stage. Tumult doesn’t extend past the stage size, so garuda
> >>> takes no damage. Not a severe exploit or anything, but does save me
> from
> >>> casting again at the start of phase 5.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> >>> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
> >>> *Sent:* 15 January 2014 1:02 PM
> >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> It also greatly depends on what folders you copy lol
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:59:20 +0000
> >>>
> >>> So I took a bunch of amvs off Paas’ drive and put them on my work
> >>> laptop.
> >>> I figured that I could have them playing in the background while I
> stuff
> >>> around with work. I didn’t really think about the content of most amvs…
> >>> not
> >>> really safe for work.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> >>> *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> >>> *Sent:* 15 January 2014 12:11 PM
> >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Neowave Geese can be patterened with most grapplers.
> >>> Daimon can just groundslam his heart away.
> >>> Mary can do her avoiding grapple all day.
> >>> Geese on AOF 2 would have been a contender if it wasn't for the stupid
> >>> jump attack/low poke glitch.
> >>> Ignits, most def.
> >>> he just randomly chucks things at you and goes for broke when something
> >>> connects.
> >>>
> >>> On 15 Jan 2014 11:45, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Geese neowave
> >>>
> >>> Igniz kof2k1
> >>>
> >>> Done talking. stoooopid cheapest ass bosses ever.
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:31:10 +0200
> >>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>
> >>> I bet people who voted Akuma in ST couldn't even unlock him. Seth
> >>> shouldn't even be on that list.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> How does Shao Kahn from any incarnation make it? Or Kintaro, or
> Motaro?
> >>> They were all really easy with basic patterns.
> >>>
> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> >>> *Sent:* 15 January 2014 11:12 AM
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *lol* I was just reading that now :P
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> And yes, they are.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> EventHubs' members are such scrubs
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/jan/14/results-most-difficult-boss-fights-fighting-games-revealed/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> *lmao* Nothing out of the ordinary :P
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> GB just wanted to have some offline matches once a week. I haven't
> >>> played
> >>> in a while so it will give me an opportunity to brush off the rust.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:12 AM, euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Cool. Now we just need to decide on a date and venue.
> >>> @Sap what is this clandestine training happening with GB?
> >>>
> >>> On 15 Jan 2014 09:03, "Ngoy Rodrigue" <ngoyrodrigue@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> second that idea Khan.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:24 PM, euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> here's a crazy idea, why dont we all go out for supper one night in
> the
> >>> week? maybe towards month end, what'ya say? i vote takumi, but ill eat
> >>> anything really.
> >>>
> >>> @GB clean up the inputs, emphasize ending the dp motion with
> >>> down-forward.
> >>> see if it helps.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:38 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hmmm, if you're using Viper you can probably utilize negative edge for
> >>> many of her inputs. So maybe you can try something like crouch fierce +
> >>> crouching medium (hold in inputs), input EX Seismo motion only then
> >>> release
> >>> inputs once the motion finishes.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I'm sure Salie or Khan would know.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:19 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Gotta say, AE is almost as 'delicate' as KOF when it comes to entering
> >>> commands.
> >>>
> >>> Seriously, if I hear Viper say "Full Charge, this will finish you" or
> >>> whatever the hell she says, she I do crouch fierce in EX Seismo... I'm
> >>> going to go nuts!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Stephen Scheidel
> >>> <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm not a sushi guy.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> But I will by default be category 3 ~ If i'm with a sushi G at a G
> sushi
> >>> place I'll tuck in like a G.
> >>> I just get put off by how much slop run of the mill stuff there is out
> >>> there.
> >>>
> >>> Think about the poor Tuna ;(
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 14 January 2014 07:10, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ryu and Ken have *very* slightly different hurt/push boxes. I noticed
> >>> this when I was working on some Blanka setups.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:50 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> yeah, thats what makes it whiff. now wee, Ken reels too, but the combo
> >>> is simpler on him, or what? anyway, if you say it isn't the same, then
> >>> it
> >>> probably isn't. Thanks though.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Do you see how Ryu sometimes reels back sometimes? That's what makes
> >>> the combo hard to land vs him. Do a focus attack first, practice
> >>> against
> >>> a
> >>> different character, or do the cr.mk variation.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:42 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZN-3fk4LJk0&feature=youtu.be
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, two and a slide is basically what I do, and then follow with the
> >>> tostada presses :-) They should make that break focus.
> >>>
> >>> LOL. I figured if I can just master RSF, then it doesn't matter how
> >>> badly
> >>> I play him, I just need to land the combo :-) HEHEHE
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If you haven't stunned them then just do two and end in slide. There
> >>> are lots of factors to take into account (initial distance, char width,
> >>> reel animation, screen position etc). Boxer and Sagat and maybe Seth
> >>> are
> >>> the easiest to do it on.
> >>>
> >>> You shouldn't even worry about that stuff yet. Hardest thing with
> >>> Fuerte
> >>> is movement and his brand of "footsies". Watch TKD play. He moves
> >>> around
> >>> for 30s doing seemingly random stuff but all he is doing is baiting
> >>> jumps
> >>> and projectiles so that he can land a EX DP or Ultra. If you don't
> >>> react
> >>> at all, he goes ham on you. It's a lose-lose situation unless you can
> >>> match his movement, which is extremely hard to do without making a
> >>> mistake.
> >>>
> >>> Poongko also has a good Fuerte:
> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSjFcYDohlk
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:22 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Will watch these now.
> >>>
> >>> Seems like there are different timings for certain characters? Either
> >>> that
> >>> or its all in my head. It doesn't feel like it though.
> >>>
> >>> Like, I can do 2 on anybody no matter the distance or situation pretty
> >>> simply, except on Ryu, E.Ryu and Ken.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> When I tried now, I changed the timing just a bit, after watching that
> >>> video you put up.
> >>>
> >>> For Ryu, I let elf run abt... 1/2 frame longer before I stop fierce.
> Its
> >>> actually easier on Ryu, E.Ryu and Ken, since its a bit slower but...
> >>> I'll
> >>> have to adjust.
> >>>
> >>> I don't know if there is a simpler way to do this. I just picked up
> Elf,
> >>> did that last trial and tried to see if I could do more than 3. So if
> >>> the
> >>> inputs are incorrect, don't kill me. ill upload in a bit
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> They once had a kumite where TKD faced all 17 characters in Vanilla:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKvbC_4nWAQ&list=PL61DDF92CE41F3F75
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> El Fuerte was bottom tier in Vanilla SFIV, but everyone hated playing
> >>> against TKD because he was just that good. Mago once said Sagat vs
> >>> Fuerte
> >>> is 8:2 in Vanilla Sagat's favour, except against TKD.
> >>>
> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irVyT6o6N1s
> >>>
> >>> He was REALLY good with Fuerte.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> El Fuerte was bottom tier in Vanilla SFIV, but everyone hated playing
> >>> against TKD because he was just that good. Mago once said Sagat vs
> >>> Fuerte
> >>> is 8:2 in Vanilla Sagat's favour, except against TKD.
> >>>
> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irVyT6o6N1s
> >>>
> >>> He was REALLY good with Fuerte.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:47 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> LOL! That ELF is awesome!
> >>>
> >>> Ok. I'm going to try now.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Practice on Sagat. I can only do like 4 max on anyone. I have dumb
> >>> fingers. You should be able to land more than 3 on Ryu. Here TKD
> (best
> >>> ELF ever) lands 4 after a stun:
> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyOhAMtyCdw
> >>>
> >>> They had an El Fuerte festival at a Japanese arcade a few years ago.
> >>> Everyone dressed like Fuerte and everyone played him, and they had a
> >>> mini
> >>> tourney to see who could do the highest combo. TKD won it. RSF into
> >>> stun,
> >>> RSF into super.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:28 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Also, does RSF loop work on everybody? I can't do it to everyone, it
> >>> seems. e.g. I've managed to get 7 on Adon but not even 3 on Ryu? Fierce
> >>> whiffs
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:26 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Well, I like to try something new all the time. Usually when I go out,
> >>> I
> >>> usually try hotels and stuff, but not really anything deep in Town.
> >>> So hidden gems and 'you've totally got to try' places alike would be
> >>> great.
> >>>
> >>> Seeing as how I haven't heard of any of these places you guys have
> >>> mentioned, I'm willing to give it a shot.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> What do you want to know about? Best burgers? Tapas? Sushi? Pizza?
> >>>
> >>> It's mostly subjective and there are other factors (eg. I don't like
> >>> Cafe
> >>> Manhattans burgers because I don't eat bacon, which is essential to
> >>> balancing out the taste of the blue cheese), and there are lots of
> "best
> >>> of" lists out there that compile popular opinions. When we go out, we
> >>> like
> >>> to check out "hidden gems" and places that are off people's radars. A
> >>> lot
> >>> of the things we also like to try won't really appeal to the average
> >>> Cape
> >>> Town pallete (pigeon brains, anyone?)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:09 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Can somebody compile a list of these places sometime?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This is what sushi looks like at the best sushi restaurant in the
> >>> world:
> >>>
> >>> http://also.kottke.org/misc/images/jiros-sushi.jpg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hmmm. Sap, what did you think of that sushi place we went to?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
> >>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 3:00 PM
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You are the first person I have met then who thinks that...
> >>>
> >>> While I havent personally been to japan everyone else I know who went
> >>> came
> >>> back generally un-impressed with regards to sushi over there.
> >>>
> >>> Other than that it just looks uninteristing/boring/bland in general
> >>> compared to what we have on offer here imo...
> >>>
> >>> No idea if any of the places ive been to had proper chefs. Doesnt
> >>> matter
> >>> if it tastes good.
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:47:55 +0000
> >>>
> >>> Wow, you got a maki roll up your butt about this stuff or something?
> >>>
> >>> I was recommending the other place because it actually has a sushi
> chef,
> >>> not some random fish chef who knows how to roll salmon roses. As for
> >>> actual
> >>> Japanese sushi, I’d say it is massively better than the stuff we get
> >>> here.
> >>> I dunno, that’s just based on the sushi that I ate in Japan.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> >>> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
> >>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:40 PM
> >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Pretty much all our sushi is westernised sushi...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> If you dont want that then just order the bland shit
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:35:15 +0000
> >>>
> >>> Yup, for Westernised sushi, Willoughby is pretty good.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> >>> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
> >>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:33 PM
> >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Just go to to Willoughby & Co for Sushi
> >>>
> >>> Fuck the other frauds
> >>>
> >>> :P
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:29:56 +0000
> >>>
> >>> BTW Tzeitel, if you’re looking for a proper sushi place sometime, I’d
> >>> also
> >>> recommend Minato’s -
> >>>
> http://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g312659-d1118597-Reviews-Minato-Cape_Town_Central_Western_Cape.html
> >>>
> >>> The food is excellent, but the service is a little...odd. The waitress
> >>> (who I think is the chef’s wife) told us that we didn’t know what we
> >>> were
> >>> doing with the orders and that she’d just bring whatever the chef
> >>> decided
> >>> to make.
> >>>
> >>> I think you might be better off with
> >>> http://www.capetownmagazine.com/takumi. Well, better decor anyway.
> >>>
> >>> I dunno if there are any other places in Cape Town where you can
> >>> actually
> >>> get a real sushi chef doing the stuff.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> >>> *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> >>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:16 PM
> >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Not yet, give me time.
> >>>
> >>> On 14 Jan 2014 14:02, "Donaldson, Alasdair"
> >>> <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From the name I assumed it would be nsfw.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> >>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:02 PM
> >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *lol* The Nic!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Very entertaining :P
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:42 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> http://youtu.be/ZqFl_e1WOGA
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Stephen Scheidel
> >>> <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> They could have saved themselves the embarrassment and just done this
> >>> from the beginning.
> >>>
> >>> have they fixed the issue with the civilians losing the plot?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 14/01/2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> > I was playing till nearly 11pm. You could have just sent me a
> message
> >>> via
> >>> > Steam Chat.
> >>> >
> >>> > Noone saw this coming...
> >>> >
> >>> > http://www.simcity.com/en_US/blog/article/simcity-offline-is-coming
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:46 AM, lindsey kiviets
> >>> > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Gb you missing out man. KOF matches are intensifying online.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> scumbag ilitrit says we must play on dolphin, doesn't show up to get
> >>> >> beat.
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>> >> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> >> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:42:54 +0200
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>> >> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
> >>> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Oh yes. Wow, sorry.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Yeah, I saw that on TFG.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> We all know that this is going to suck though. Even if it is
> directed
> >>> >> by
> >>> >> the Ong Bak guy, it would probably just be a "wow cool fight scene"
> >>> >> movie
> >>> >> that with Tekken- characters that don't follow the proper story...
> at
> >>> >> all.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> If the other Tekken movie was called BloodSport 2099 or something, I
> >>> >> probably wouldn't hate it as much.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Even the CGI Tekken movie was absurd. I don't get it.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Ilitirit Sama
> >>> >> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> He's referring to her seismo.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> New Tekken movie by Ong Bak director.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-01-13-theres-a-new-tekken-movie
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:38 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> She has a command throw?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Not that I need a command throw to turn her into a grappler ;-p
> >>> >> On 13 Jan 2014 19:39, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Imagine you're playing as Shen when picking C.Viper... only with
> >>> >> more...Benimaru...and K'... and Daimon.
> >>> >> On 13 Jan 2014 18:15, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> That is what you told me since you met me. Play Sakura, Cammy or
> >>> >> Viper.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Ugh, those feints look like a bother to do but hey, I'll give her a
> >>> >> proper
> >>> >> bash. Should be fun.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> First ten second of the video looks like fun.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Was watching this guy Zeny53's Elf... LOL. The guy is the best.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> @GB:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I really think you would enjoy C.Viper in SSFIV. She's really cheap
> >>> >> and
> >>> >> her pressure game is kinda like what a KOF character would do.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXFonlAPlWw
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> =========================================================================
> >>>
> >>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing
> >>> list.
> >>>
> >>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> >>> e-mail
> >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> >>> in
> >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> send
> >>> to
> >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> >>> it.
> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
> >>> it,
> >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
> >>> this
> >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> >>> governing
> >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> >>> information
> >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >>>
> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> >>> error-free,
> >>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> >>> destroyed,
> >>> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >>>
> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> >>> services
> >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> Swiss
> >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> independent
> >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
> legally
> >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> >>> Information
> >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
> >>> be
> >>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
> >>>
> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> >>> AntiVirus software.
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> >>> e-mail
> >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> >>> in
> >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> send
> >>> to
> >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> >>> it.
> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
> >>> it,
> >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
> >>> this
> >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> >>> governing
> >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> >>> information
> >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >>>
> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> >>> error-free,
> >>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> >>> destroyed,
> >>> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >>>
> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> >>> services
> >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> Swiss
> >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> independent
> >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
> legally
> >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> >>> Information
> >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
> >>> be
> >>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
> >>>
> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> >>> AntiVirus software.
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> >>> e-mail
> >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> >>> in
> >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> send
> >>> to
> >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> >>> it.
> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
> >>> it,
> >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
> >>> this
> >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> >>> governing
> >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> >>> information
> >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >>>
> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> >>> error-free,
> >>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> >>> destroyed,
> >>> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >>>
> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> >>> services
> >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> Swiss
> >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> independent
> >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
> legally
> >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> >>> Information
> >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
> >>> be
> >>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
> >>>
> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> >>> AntiVirus software.
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> >>> e-mail
> >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> >>> in
> >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> send
> >>> to
> >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> >>> it.
> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
> >>> it,
> >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
> >>> this
> >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> >>> governing
> >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> >>> information
> >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >>>
> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> >>> error-free,
> >>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> >>> destroyed,
> >>> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >>>
> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> >>> services
> >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> Swiss
> >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> independent
> >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
> legally
> >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> >>> Information
> >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
> >>> be
> >>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
> >>>
> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> >>> AntiVirus software.
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> >>> e-mail
> >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> >>> in
> >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> send
> >>> to
> >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> >>> it.
> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
> >>> it,
> >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
> >>> this
> >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> >>> governing
> >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> >>> information
> >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >>>
> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> >>> error-free,
> >>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> >>> destroyed,
> >>> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >>>
> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> >>> services
> >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> Swiss
> >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> independent
> >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
> legally
> >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> >>> Information
> >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
> >>> be
> >>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
> >>>
> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> >>> AntiVirus software.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> >>> e-mail
> >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> >>> in
> >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> send
> >>> to
> >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> >>> it.
> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
> >>> it,
> >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
> >>> this
> >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> >>> governing
> >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> >>> information
> >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >>>
> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> >>> error-free,
> >>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> >>> destroyed,
> >>> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >>>
> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> >>> services
> >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> Swiss
> >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> independent
> >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
> legally
> >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> >>> Information
> >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
> >>> be
> >>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
> >>>
> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> >>> AntiVirus software.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> >>> e-mail
> >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> >>> in
> >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> send
> >>> to
> >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> >>> it.
> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
> >>> it,
> >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
> >>> this
> >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> >>> governing
> >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> >>> information
> >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >>>
> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> >>> error-free,
> >>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> >>> destroyed,
> >>> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >>>
> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> >>> services
> >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> Swiss
> >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> independent
> >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
> legally
> >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> >>> Information
> >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
> >>> be
> >>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
> >>>
> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> >>> AntiVirus software.
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> >>> e-mail
> >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> >>> in
> >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> send
> >>> to
> >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> >>> it.
> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
> >>> it,
> >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
> >>> this
> >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> >>> governing
> >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> >>> information
> >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >>>
> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> >>> error-free,
> >>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> >>> destroyed,
> >>> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >>>
> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> >>> services
> >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> Swiss
> >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> independent
> >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
> legally
> >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> >>> Information
> >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
> >>> be
> >>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
> >>>
> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> >>> AntiVirus software.
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> >>> e-mail
> >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> >>> in
> >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> send
> >>> to
> >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> >>> it.
> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
> >>> it,
> >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
> >>> this
> >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> >>> governing
> >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> >>> information
> >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >>>
> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> >>> error-free,
> >>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> >>> destroyed,
> >>> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >>>
> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> >>> services
> >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> Swiss
> >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> independent
> >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
> legally
> >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> >>> Information
> >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
> >>> be
> >>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
> >>>
> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> >>> AntiVirus software.
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> >>> e-mail
> >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> >>> in
> >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> send
> >>> to
> >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> >>> it.
> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
> >>> it,
> >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
> >>> this
> >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> >>> governing
> >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> >>> information
> >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >>>
> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> >>> error-free,
> >>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> >>> destroyed,
> >>> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >>>
> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> >>> services
> >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> Swiss
> >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> independent
> >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
> legally
> >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> >>> Information
> >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
> >>> be
> >>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
> >>>
> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> >>> AntiVirus software.
> >>>
> >>
> >
> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
Other related posts:
