Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:09:16 +0200
So you're going to have your own hitbox now Paas? *lol*
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Soon...
>
> Bloody PCB I ordered is taking eons to get here. (Got stuck at a sorting
> facility in Thailand or something...)
>
> Once I have my keyboard up and running ill come dominate you SF noobs
>
> :D
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:54:51 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Well whooping me should be easy, considering that I literally haven't
> touched the game since last year.
>
> If I convincingly win matches despite being rusty, you'll have to hold dat
> :P
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:45 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Who is that asian DJ, Steve?
>
> Its not actually training, Khan. Its me going to whoop SAP. hehehe.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Got Haukke on roulette. The music is uh, quite different.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
> *Sent:* 15 January 2014 1:20 PM
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
> Nope, not yet.
>
> Only attempted the sirius thing
> ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:18:26 +0000
>
> I don’t recall, have you run the new Haukke, Paas? It’s…fun.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
> *Sent:* 15 January 2014 1:14 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
> Nah DF sucks
>
> Just do the new party finder thing. There are constant new groups forming
> for Titan, just keep at it there and you should find a good group
> eventually.
>
>
> Im back tonight so I can start gathering the rest of the Phil tomes so I
> can create my relic.
> ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:09:42 +0000
>
> Man, Titan on DF is a joke. Played with a bunch of people using low level
> gear. We couldn’t get past the heart, despite everyone being alive through
> the whole phase. Then you get comments like ‘Wow that was so close, we can
> do this!’
>
> Uh, no. We didn’t have the dps to get through the heart phase, we ain’t
> going to make the fight. Sigh. Stick around for another 2 tries but just
> gets worse after that.
>
>
>
> Oh, I didn’t realise but there is a bug with garuda. I can put the pet on
> the edge of the stage. When edge breaks, garuda just parks off past the
> edge of the stage. Tumult doesn’t extend past the stage size, so garuda
> takes no damage. Not a severe exploit or anything, but does save me from
> casting again at the start of phase 5.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
> *Sent:* 15 January 2014 1:02 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
> It also greatly depends on what folders you copy lol
> ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:59:20 +0000
>
> So I took a bunch of amvs off Paas’ drive and put them on my work laptop.
> I figured that I could have them playing in the background while I stuff
> around with work. I didn’t really think about the content of most amvs… not
> really safe for work.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> *Sent:* 15 January 2014 12:11 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
> Neowave Geese can be patterened with most grapplers.
> Daimon can just groundslam his heart away.
> Mary can do her avoiding grapple all day.
> Geese on AOF 2 would have been a contender if it wasn't for the stupid
> jump attack/low poke glitch.
> Ignits, most def.
> he just randomly chucks things at you and goes for broke when something
> connects.
>
> On 15 Jan 2014 11:45, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Geese neowave
>
> Igniz kof2k1
>
> Done talking. stoooopid cheapest ass bosses ever.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:31:10 +0200
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I bet people who voted Akuma in ST couldn't even unlock him. Seth
> shouldn't even be on that list.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> How does Shao Kahn from any incarnation make it? Or Kintaro, or Motaro?
> They were all really easy with basic patterns.
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 15 January 2014 11:12 AM
>
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
>
>
> *lol* I was just reading that now :P
>
>
>
> And yes, they are.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> EventHubs' members are such scrubs
>
>
> http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/jan/14/results-most-difficult-boss-fights-fighting-games-revealed/
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> *lmao* Nothing out of the ordinary :P
>
>
>
> GB just wanted to have some offline matches once a week. I haven't played
> in a while so it will give me an opportunity to brush off the rust.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:12 AM, euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Cool. Now we just need to decide on a date and venue.
> @Sap what is this clandestine training happening with GB?
>
> On 15 Jan 2014 09:03, "Ngoy Rodrigue" <ngoyrodrigue@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> second that idea Khan.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:24 PM, euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> here's a crazy idea, why dont we all go out for supper one night in the
> week? maybe towards month end, what'ya say? i vote takumi, but ill eat
> anything really.
>
> @GB clean up the inputs, emphasize ending the dp motion with down-forward.
> see if it helps.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:38 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Hmmm, if you're using Viper you can probably utilize negative edge for
> many of her inputs. So maybe you can try something like crouch fierce +
> crouching medium (hold in inputs), input EX Seismo motion only then release
> inputs once the motion finishes.
>
>
>
> I'm sure Salie or Khan would know.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:19 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Gotta say, AE is almost as 'delicate' as KOF when it comes to entering
> commands.
>
> Seriously, if I hear Viper say "Full Charge, this will finish you" or
> whatever the hell she says, she I do crouch fierce in EX Seismo... I'm
> going to go nuts!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I'm not a sushi guy.
>
>
>
> But I will by default be category 3 ~ If i'm with a sushi G at a G sushi
> place I'll tuck in like a G.
> I just get put off by how much slop run of the mill stuff there is out
> there.
>
> Think about the poor Tuna ;(
>
>
>
> On 14 January 2014 07:10, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ryu and Ken have *very* slightly different hurt/push boxes. I noticed
> this when I was working on some Blanka setups.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:50 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> yeah, thats what makes it whiff. now wee, Ken reels too, but the combo
> is simpler on him, or what? anyway, if you say it isn't the same, then it
> probably isn't. Thanks though.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Do you see how Ryu sometimes reels back sometimes? That's what makes
> the combo hard to land vs him. Do a focus attack first, practice against a
> different character, or do the cr.mk variation.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:42 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZN-3fk4LJk0&feature=youtu.be
>
> Yeah, two and a slide is basically what I do, and then follow with the
> tostada presses :-) They should make that break focus.
>
> LOL. I figured if I can just master RSF, then it doesn't matter how badly
> I play him, I just need to land the combo :-) HEHEHE
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If you haven't stunned them then just do two and end in slide. There
> are lots of factors to take into account (initial distance, char width,
> reel animation, screen position etc). Boxer and Sagat and maybe Seth are
> the easiest to do it on.
>
> You shouldn't even worry about that stuff yet. Hardest thing with Fuerte
> is movement and his brand of "footsies". Watch TKD play. He moves around
> for 30s doing seemingly random stuff but all he is doing is baiting jumps
> and projectiles so that he can land a EX DP or Ultra. If you don't react
> at all, he goes ham on you. It's a lose-lose situation unless you can
> match his movement, which is extremely hard to do without making a mistake.
>
> Poongko also has a good Fuerte:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSjFcYDohlk
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:22 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Will watch these now.
>
> Seems like there are different timings for certain characters? Either that
> or its all in my head. It doesn't feel like it though.
>
> Like, I can do 2 on anybody no matter the distance or situation pretty
> simply, except on Ryu, E.Ryu and Ken.
>
>
>
> When I tried now, I changed the timing just a bit, after watching that
> video you put up.
>
> For Ryu, I let elf run abt... 1/2 frame longer before I stop fierce. Its
> actually easier on Ryu, E.Ryu and Ken, since its a bit slower but... I'll
> have to adjust.
>
> I don't know if there is a simpler way to do this. I just picked up Elf,
> did that last trial and tried to see if I could do more than 3. So if the
> inputs are incorrect, don't kill me. ill upload in a bit
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> They once had a kumite where TKD faced all 17 characters in Vanilla:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKvbC_4nWAQ&list=PL61DDF92CE41F3F75
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> El Fuerte was bottom tier in Vanilla SFIV, but everyone hated playing
> against TKD because he was just that good. Mago once said Sagat vs Fuerte
> is 8:2 in Vanilla Sagat's favour, except against TKD.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irVyT6o6N1s
>
> He was REALLY good with Fuerte.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> El Fuerte was bottom tier in Vanilla SFIV, but everyone hated playing
> against TKD because he was just that good. Mago once said Sagat vs Fuerte
> is 8:2 in Vanilla Sagat's favour, except against TKD.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irVyT6o6N1s
>
> He was REALLY good with Fuerte.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:47 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> LOL! That ELF is awesome!
>
> Ok. I'm going to try now.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Practice on Sagat. I can only do like 4 max on anyone. I have dumb
> fingers. You should be able to land more than 3 on Ryu. Here TKD (best
> ELF ever) lands 4 after a stun:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyOhAMtyCdw
>
> They had an El Fuerte festival at a Japanese arcade a few years ago.
> Everyone dressed like Fuerte and everyone played him, and they had a mini
> tourney to see who could do the highest combo. TKD won it. RSF into stun,
> RSF into super.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:28 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Also, does RSF loop work on everybody? I can't do it to everyone, it
> seems. e.g. I've managed to get 7 on Adon but not even 3 on Ryu? Fierce
> whiffs
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:26 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Well, I like to try something new all the time. Usually when I go out, I
> usually try hotels and stuff, but not really anything deep in Town.
> So hidden gems and 'you've totally got to try' places alike would be great.
>
> Seeing as how I haven't heard of any of these places you guys have
> mentioned, I'm willing to give it a shot.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> What do you want to know about? Best burgers? Tapas? Sushi? Pizza?
>
> It's mostly subjective and there are other factors (eg. I don't like Cafe
> Manhattans burgers because I don't eat bacon, which is essential to
> balancing out the taste of the blue cheese), and there are lots of "best
> of" lists out there that compile popular opinions. When we go out, we like
> to check out "hidden gems" and places that are off people's radars. A lot
> of the things we also like to try won't really appeal to the average Cape
> Town pallete (pigeon brains, anyone?)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:09 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Can somebody compile a list of these places sometime?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is what sushi looks like at the best sushi restaurant in the world:
>
> http://also.kottke.org/misc/images/jiros-sushi.jpg
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hmmm. Sap, what did you think of that sushi place we went to?
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 3:00 PM
>
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
> You are the first person I have met then who thinks that...
>
> While I havent personally been to japan everyone else I know who went came
> back generally un-impressed with regards to sushi over there.
>
> Other than that it just looks uninteristing/boring/bland in general
> compared to what we have on offer here imo...
>
> No idea if any of the places ive been to had proper chefs. Doesnt matter
> if it tastes good.
> ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:47:55 +0000
>
> Wow, you got a maki roll up your butt about this stuff or something?
>
> I was recommending the other place because it actually has a sushi chef,
> not some random fish chef who knows how to roll salmon roses. As for actual
> Japanese sushi, I’d say it is massively better than the stuff we get here.
> I dunno, that’s just based on the sushi that I ate in Japan.
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:40 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
> Pretty much all our sushi is westernised sushi...
>
>
> If you dont want that then just order the bland shit
> ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:35:15 +0000
>
> Yup, for Westernised sushi, Willoughby is pretty good.
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:33 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
> Just go to to Willoughby & Co for Sushi
>
> Fuck the other frauds
>
> :P
> ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:29:56 +0000
>
> BTW Tzeitel, if you’re looking for a proper sushi place sometime, I’d also
> recommend Minato’s -
> http://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g312659-d1118597-Reviews-Minato-Cape_Town_Central_Western_Cape.html
>
> The food is excellent, but the service is a little...odd. The waitress
> (who I think is the chef’s wife) told us that we didn’t know what we were
> doing with the orders and that she’d just bring whatever the chef decided
> to make.
>
> I think you might be better off with
> http://www.capetownmagazine.com/takumi. Well, better decor anyway.
>
> I dunno if there are any other places in Cape Town where you can actually
> get a real sushi chef doing the stuff.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:16 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
> Not yet, give me time.
>
> On 14 Jan 2014 14:02, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> From the name I assumed it would be nsfw.
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:02 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
> *lol* The Nic!
>
>
>
> Very entertaining :P
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:42 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> http://youtu.be/ZqFl_e1WOGA
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> They could have saved themselves the embarrassment and just done this
> from the beginning.
>
> have they fixed the issue with the civilians losing the plot?
>
>
> On 14/01/2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I was playing till nearly 11pm. You could have just sent me a message
> via
> > Steam Chat.
> >
> > Noone saw this coming...
> >
> > http://www.simcity.com/en_US/blog/article/simcity-offline-is-coming
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:46 AM, lindsey kiviets
> > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >
> >> Gb you missing out man. KOF matches are intensifying online.
> >>
> >> scumbag ilitrit says we must play on dolphin, doesn't show up to get
> >> beat.
> >>
>
> >> ------------------------------
>
> >> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:42:54 +0200
> >>
> >> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >> Oh yes. Wow, sorry.
> >>
> >> Yeah, I saw that on TFG.
> >>
> >> We all know that this is going to suck though. Even if it is directed by
> >> the Ong Bak guy, it would probably just be a "wow cool fight scene"
> >> movie
> >> that with Tekken- characters that don't follow the proper story... at
> >> all.
> >>
> >> If the other Tekken movie was called BloodSport 2099 or something, I
> >> probably wouldn't hate it as much.
> >>
> >> Even the CGI Tekken movie was absurd. I don't get it.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Ilitirit Sama
> >> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >>
> >> He's referring to her seismo.
> >>
> >> New Tekken movie by Ong Bak director.
> >>
> >> http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-01-13-theres-a-new-tekken-movie
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:38 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> She has a command throw?
> >>
> >> Not that I need a command throw to turn her into a grappler ;-p
> >> On 13 Jan 2014 19:39, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Imagine you're playing as Shen when picking C.Viper... only with
> >> more...Benimaru...and K'... and Daimon.
> >> On 13 Jan 2014 18:15, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> That is what you told me since you met me. Play Sakura, Cammy or Viper.
> >>
> >> Ugh, those feints look like a bother to do but hey, I'll give her a
> >> proper
> >> bash. Should be fun.
> >>
> >> First ten second of the video looks like fun.
> >>
> >> Was watching this guy Zeny53's Elf... LOL. The guy is the best.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> @GB:
> >>
> >> I really think you would enjoy C.Viper in SSFIV. She's really cheap and
> >> her pressure game is kinda like what a KOF character would do.
> >>
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXFonlAPlWw
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> =========================================================================
>
> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
