Thanks man. Carne was quite pricey but very worth it. We're only gonna do one place a month so there is not much chance of having to file bankruptcy from the odd pricey meal. On 13 January 2014 13:48, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Haven't had good seafood in ages. Mostly because of my seafood allergy. > In my experience the biggest problem, especially with seafood restaurants, > is consistency. > > Roca at Cape Quarter has buffet 5 or 6 times a week which is actually > pretty good. They do a bit of everything, including fish, prawn and mussel > dishes. Sunday afternoon I think is the seafood buffet. Problem is that > if the owner isn't there to oversee things in the kitchen, the food is > pretty crappy. Also, if they have lots of left overs from Saturday I'm > pretty sure they use it on their Sunday menu, but don't quote me on that. > > Codfather in Camps Bay is overrated and overpriced, but they do have nice > things occasionally. I had really good angel fish the last time I was > there. In my experience, the other restaurants in Camps Bay are terrible. > Blues may be the exception, but it's nothing special I don't think. > > Willoughby's does a popular fish and chips meal, but you probably know > this already. > > Baia at the Waterfront was actually really good the last time I was there, > but it was quite pricey > > I've heard from two people recently that I should check out Bentley's > Oyster Bar in Claremont but I've never been there so I can't comment > > My favourite seafood platter used to be at Cubana Greenpoint, but I > haven't had it in over a year. I don't know what linefish they use these > days > > In terms of Asian places, Thai Cafe in Sea Point (best Thai restaurant but > avoid anything with coconut - way too rich). > > Mr Chan used to do the best Sichuan prawn/kingklip, deep fried fish, prawn > omelette, fish stomach soup (off the menu), prawn on toast, clams, chillied > calamari and seafood fried rice. When Mrs Chan was their she once made the > most tender grilled calamari I'd ever had. I really need to go back there > just to test the food again... > > > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Stephen Scheidel > <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> Hey Salie ~ or anyone. >> >> Me and some of my non-FG friends are trying to do a bit of a GOOD >> restaurant round trip. >> We were at Carne SA on Friday for steaks and that was phenomenal. >> >> Next on the list is seafood ~ Any suggestions for a good seafood place >> aroundish CT ? >> >> >> On 13 January 2014 12:06, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Nope, going to visit my folks tonight >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:05:13 +0000 >>> >>> >>> Thanks. You’re not around tonight, right? >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben >>> *Sent:* 13 January 2014 11:58 AM >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>> >>> >>> >>> I wont mind joining in if you need another DPS that already knows the >>> fight >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:56:41 +0000 >>> >>> DPS. >>> >>> My healer still needs a few levels. Also, my smn is actually pretty well >>> geared. It will take a bit of time for my healer to get there. >>> >>> Cool, thanks. I’ll let you know during the week how things are going and >>> if (more likely, when) I’ll need your help. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >>> Behalf Of *euraima tobias >>> *Sent:* 13 January 2014 11:54 AM >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>> >>> >>> >>> Sure man. Which class you going as, dps or healer? >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> ------------------------------ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> >> >> >