Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

  • From: Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:18:10 +0200

What time are you heading there? Where can we meet? i'll probably be there
the whole session :) no plans for saturday until sundown. Will probably
only go feast on booze after sun down but no rush :) Otherwise, i'll take
on an adventure with myciti bus haha


On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Nope there are no counter-hit throws.  What Manase means that if you mash
> crouch tech (breaking throws from a crouching position - the default
> defensive option) you will get frame trapped very easily.
>
> If you're still in town you can get a ride with me, but if you want to
> leave early you'll need to organise a ride home.  I don't know if the
> MyCiti bus operates near there, but since TygerValley is close by, I'm
> guessing it should.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> throw's count as CH? damn. Tekken have this weird funky thing about throw
>> too...eg. if i throw kaz and he does df+2...it's not CH...but if you throw
>> Asuka while she does Can Can (d+3+4) you get launch even tho the move only
>> launch in CH...weird...similar to trying to ss or sw and william sisters do
>> d+3,2...CH. wtf lolz
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> @Di
>>> You cannot really spam throws in order to break them because that will
>>> make you a counter hit set up fodder :)
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > @lb - no use getting the game if i don't have a console...-_________-"
>>> if i
>>> > have a console, i would practice tekken throw break all day...my
>>> greatest
>>> > weakness lolz whoops! secrets out...
>>> >
>>> > @salie(?) - oh ok. so while blocking strings i can just spam throws
>>> incase
>>> > they attempt to throw? so command grabs are unbreakable and it hit
>>> crouching
>>> > opponents? damn how come they don't have that in tekken lolz i'm the
>>> throw
>>> > master of bkk XD
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:19 PM, lindsey kiviets <
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Di stop trolling.
>>> >>
>>> >> get the game.
>>> >>
>>> >> ________________________________
>>> >> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
>>> >> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:10:25 +0200
>>> >>
>>> >> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Ah ok. Well it's good to know about the invincible animations :)
>>> >>
>>> >> command grab hits crouching opponent? can you break it?
>>> >>
>>> >> How do you break throws? same as tekken, press a button depending on
>>> what
>>> >> throw.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Green is the hurtbox.  If there's no hurtbox, he is invincible during
>>> >> those frames.
>>> >>
>>> >> Don't rely on those hitbox pics though.  They're not entirely
>>> accurate.
>>> >>
>>> >> Blue hitbox is his command grab range.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Quick question about SF
>>> >>
>>> >> If the red box is hit box, what's the green part? invincible? "hurt"
>>> box?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> http://www.eventhubs.com/images/2011/sep/30/yuns-hit-box-information-super-street-fighter-4-arcade-edition-image-1/
>>> >>
>>> >> And the blue or yellow? also sometimes Yun's green box is gone...does
>>> that
>>> >> mean invincible (eg. start of his shoulder barge)?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> http://www.eventhubs.com/images/2011/sep/30/yuns-hit-box-information-super-street-fighter-4-arcade-edition-image-2/
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> http://www.eventhubs.com/images/2011/sep/30/yuns-hit-box-information-super-street-fighter-4-arcade-edition-image-3/
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks :)
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> The first one produces a paradox when you try to perform calculations
>>> on
>>> >> limits (same as Lumi's example).
>>> >>
>>> >> Second produces a paradox because even though all the statements are
>>> true,
>>> >> the reality is different.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
>>> >> <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> That's not a paradox though, that's the question as to whether time is
>>> >> continuous.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> >> On Behalf Of Ilitirit Sama
>>> >> Sent: 13 February 2014 12:33 PM
>>> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Haha actually that wasn't one of Zeno's paradoxes.  It's related to
>>> the
>>> >> paradoxes of limits that Lumi posted though.
>>> >>
>>> >> Zeno's paradox about motion went something like this:
>>> >>
>>> >> If motion can be broken down into instances, and instances are
>>> durations
>>> >> where no motion takes place and no time passes, how can motion take
>>> place at
>>> >> all?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Always "works" because infinity is undefined.
>>> >>
>>> >> I like Zeno's paradoxes.
>>> >>
>>> >> It always takes a finite amount of time greater than zero to move
>>> between
>>> >> any two points.
>>> >> There are an infinite number of points between any two points.
>>> >>
>>> >> Therefore, it takes an infinite amount of time to move between two
>>> points
>>> >>
>>> >> Therefore, motion is impossible.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:09 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> In the spirit of the interesting idea that was posted yesterday,
>>> here's a
>>> >> nifty paradox:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/37327/infinity-1-paradox
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:05 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I think I knocked him out at a previous CTS tourney.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Don't think he should be added to the mails yet, if he's actually
>>> serious
>>> >> about fighters then cool. But we've seen too many examples of randoms
>>> being
>>> >> added and then never seeing or hearing from them.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:58 AM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Well, you may be in disbelief than LB.
>>> >>
>>> >> He is coming to the session. I should add him to the mails though.
>>> >>
>>> >> We've been playing for a bit now.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:43 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I dnt believe the sleepyforest wil say such things.
>>> >>
>>> >> ________________________________
>>> >>
>>> >> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:35:30 +0200
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> >>
>>> >> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
>>> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Hey guys. Just chilling with SleepingForest9.
>>> >> Says that ChunLi sticks are gay and so is Chun. So yeah, its a ft10
>>> >> against Lumi.
>>> >> Just letting you guys know.
>>> >>
>>> >> On 11 Feb 2014 18:47, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> LOL. STFU man! :-D
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:52 PM, lindsey kiviets <
>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> ROFLMAO
>>> >>
>>> >> the new fragrance by GB
>>> >>
>>> >> > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:41:10 +0200
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> >>
>>> >> > From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
>>> >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > DKNY
>>> >> > Don't Know Nothing You
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> =========================================================================
>>> >> > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing
>>> >> > list.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ________________________________
>>> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>>> e-mail
>>> >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>>> communication in
>>> >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
>>> send to
>>> >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
>>> it. If
>>> >> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or
>>> >> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
>>> prohibited and
>>> >> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
>>> subject
>>> >> to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
>>> >> engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
>>> >> e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of
>>> >> the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>> >>
>>> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free,
>>> >> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed,
>>> >> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>> >>
>>> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>>> services
>>> >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
>>> Swiss
>>> >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>> independent
>>> >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services
>>> >> to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and
>>> >> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about
>>> the
>>> >> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained
>>> >> from your KPMG representative.
>>> >>
>>> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> >> AntiVirus software.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> =========================================================================
>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>>>
>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>>
>>
>>
>

Other related posts: