Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:16:09 +0200
You can't break command grabs. To break a regular throw you use the throw
command from a standing or crouching position (lk + lp).
The difference between throws in SF and Tekken is that you can't really
break SF throws on reaction. You have to pre-emptively input the command
when you think the opponent is going to throw you. If you watch SFIV
matches where they have the input display enabled, you'll see players press
lk+lp while defending in case the opponent tries to throw them.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ah ok. Well it's good to know about the invincible animations :)
>
> command grab hits crouching opponent? can you break it?
>
> How do you break throws? same as tekken, press a button depending on what
> throw.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Green is the hurtbox. If there's no hurtbox, he is invincible during
>> those frames.
>>
>> Don't rely on those hitbox pics though. They're not entirely accurate.
>>
>> Blue hitbox is his command grab range.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Quick question about SF
>>>
>>> If the red box is hit box, what's the green part? invincible? "hurt" box?
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.eventhubs.com/images/2011/sep/30/yuns-hit-box-information-super-street-fighter-4-arcade-edition-image-1/
>>>
>>> And the blue or yellow? also sometimes Yun's green box is gone...does
>>> that mean invincible (eg. start of his shoulder barge)?
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.eventhubs.com/images/2011/sep/30/yuns-hit-box-information-super-street-fighter-4-arcade-edition-image-2/
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.eventhubs.com/images/2011/sep/30/yuns-hit-box-information-super-street-fighter-4-arcade-edition-image-3/
>>>
>>> Thanks :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>
>>>> The first one produces a paradox when you try to perform calculations
>>>> on limits (same as Lumi's example).
>>>>
>>>> Second produces a paradox because even though all the statements are
>>>> true, the reality is different.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That's not a paradox though, that's the question as to whether time
>>>>> is continuous.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
>>>>> *Sent:* 13 February 2014 12:33 PM
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Haha actually that wasn't one of Zeno's paradoxes. It's related to
>>>>> the paradoxes of limits that Lumi posted though.
>>>>>
>>>>> Zeno's paradox about motion went something like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> If motion can be broken down into instances, and instances are
>>>>> durations where no motion takes place and no time passes, how can motion
>>>>> take place at all?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Always "works" because infinity is undefined.
>>>>>
>>>>> I like Zeno's paradoxes.
>>>>>
>>>>> It always takes a finite amount of time greater than zero to move
>>>>> between any two points.
>>>>> There are an infinite number of points between any two points.
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore, it takes an infinite amount of time to move between two
>>>>> points
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore, motion is impossible.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:09 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> In the spirit of the interesting idea that was posted yesterday,
>>>>> here's a nifty paradox:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/37327/infinity-1-paradox
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:05 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think I knocked him out at a previous CTS tourney.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't think he should be added to the mails yet, if he's actually
>>>>> serious about fighters then cool. But we've seen too many examples of
>>>>> randoms being added and then never seeing or hearing from them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:58 AM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, you may be in disbelief than LB.
>>>>>
>>>>> He is coming to the session. I should add him to the mails though.
>>>>>
>>>>> We've been playing for a bit now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:43 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I dnt believe the sleepyforest wil say such things.
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:35:30 +0200
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey guys. Just chilling with SleepingForest9.
>>>>>
>>>>> Says that ChunLi sticks are gay and so is Chun. So yeah, its a ft10
>>>>> against Lumi.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just letting you guys know.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11 Feb 2014 18:47, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL. STFU man! :-D
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:52 PM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ROFLMAO
>>>>>
>>>>> the new fragrance by GB
>>>>>
>>>>> > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:41:10 +0200
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> > From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > DKNY
>>>>> > Don't Know Nothing You
>>>>> >
>>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>> > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing
>>>>> list.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
