Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:10:25 +0200
Ah ok. Well it's good to know about the invincible animations :)
command grab hits crouching opponent? can you break it?
How do you break throws? same as tekken, press a button depending on what
throw.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Green is the hurtbox. If there's no hurtbox, he is invincible during
> those frames.
>
> Don't rely on those hitbox pics though. They're not entirely accurate.
>
> Blue hitbox is his command grab range.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Quick question about SF
>>
>> If the red box is hit box, what's the green part? invincible? "hurt" box?
>>
>>
>> http://www.eventhubs.com/images/2011/sep/30/yuns-hit-box-information-super-street-fighter-4-arcade-edition-image-1/
>>
>> And the blue or yellow? also sometimes Yun's green box is gone...does
>> that mean invincible (eg. start of his shoulder barge)?
>>
>>
>> http://www.eventhubs.com/images/2011/sep/30/yuns-hit-box-information-super-street-fighter-4-arcade-edition-image-2/
>>
>>
>> http://www.eventhubs.com/images/2011/sep/30/yuns-hit-box-information-super-street-fighter-4-arcade-edition-image-3/
>>
>> Thanks :)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>> The first one produces a paradox when you try to perform calculations on
>>> limits (same as Lumi's example).
>>>
>>> Second produces a paradox because even though all the statements are
>>> true, the reality is different.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> That's not a paradox though, that's the question as to whether time
>>>> is continuous.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
>>>> *Sent:* 13 February 2014 12:33 PM
>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Haha actually that wasn't one of Zeno's paradoxes. It's related to the
>>>> paradoxes of limits that Lumi posted though.
>>>>
>>>> Zeno's paradox about motion went something like this:
>>>>
>>>> If motion can be broken down into instances, and instances are
>>>> durations where no motion takes place and no time passes, how can motion
>>>> take place at all?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Always "works" because infinity is undefined.
>>>>
>>>> I like Zeno's paradoxes.
>>>>
>>>> It always takes a finite amount of time greater than zero to move
>>>> between any two points.
>>>> There are an infinite number of points between any two points.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, it takes an infinite amount of time to move between two
>>>> points
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, motion is impossible.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:09 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In the spirit of the interesting idea that was posted yesterday,
>>>> here's a nifty paradox:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/37327/infinity-1-paradox
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:05 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think I knocked him out at a previous CTS tourney.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Don't think he should be added to the mails yet, if he's actually
>>>> serious about fighters then cool. But we've seen too many examples of
>>>> randoms being added and then never seeing or hearing from them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:58 AM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well, you may be in disbelief than LB.
>>>>
>>>> He is coming to the session. I should add him to the mails though.
>>>>
>>>> We've been playing for a bit now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:43 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I dnt believe the sleepyforest wil say such things.
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:35:30 +0200
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>
>>>> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hey guys. Just chilling with SleepingForest9.
>>>>
>>>> Says that ChunLi sticks are gay and so is Chun. So yeah, its a ft10
>>>> against Lumi.
>>>>
>>>> Just letting you guys know.
>>>>
>>>> On 11 Feb 2014 18:47, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> LOL. STFU man! :-D
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:52 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ROFLMAO
>>>>
>>>> the new fragrance by GB
>>>>
>>>> > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:41:10 +0200
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>
>>>> > From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > DKNY
>>>> > Don't Know Nothing You
>>>> >
>>>> =========================================================================
>>>> > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing
>>>> list.
>>>> >
>>>> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts: