Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:10:57 +0200
Dude, by that logic, Shen is a shoto. That is absurd.
I think that it is as Illitrit said, because of the broad definition of
what a 'shoto' is, you can't just apply which ever definition you like to a
character and then say that character is a shoto, as those fools over that
Street Fighter wikia have done.
I don't think Maxi is a shoto since he isn't the main soul cali character
nor are his movements that of a 'conventional fighter' (one of the
coolest/unique characters in the game... IMO).
Iori, while nothing like Ryu, does have the basic elements of the game in
his playstyle... much more so than Daimon or Choi, for example. Sure, he
has a fireball and an uppercut, but that isn't what makes him a 'shoto' of
the game.
Kage in VF... man I hate that game...lol, but from the little that I know,
I think that Akira dude is probably more the "shoto".
TL:DR -> Fuck other definitions. Shotos have fireballs, uppercuts and a
spinning kick move (same commands) and are the basic characters of the game
.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:00 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> I can see makoto being classed as a shoto. She dnt hav magical powers to
> control horizontal space, bt she has a fast dash punch. So she although its
> short , uses herself as a firebal in essence.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:51:26 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Not sure... What I meant was, like, a Flash Kick going downwards... a dp
> killer :-) EX is a projectile :-) Yup.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> *lol* Didn't Charlie have something like that in Xmen vs Street Fighter?
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:40 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On that note, Guile has to get an aerial Flash kick.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> It has EVERYTHING to do with how they play.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> Ah k
>
> So a character being referred to as a Shoto has nothing to do with how
> they play but how they look?
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:58:47 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: eetcarr@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Sagat mos a Mui Thai dude. Kick boxer. Shotokan is an actual discipline of
> Karate.
> So i guess you could say whoever wears a Karate outfit "gi" in the game
> are shoto or shoto based. Dan akuma ken ryu. Sakura?
>
> People, back me up here
>
>
> On 12 February 2014 13:55, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hehe
>
> I barely play the game :P
> Thats just how it seems to me.
>
> Serious question then
> What is a shoto?
> Why would Sagat not be a shoto?
>
> Just wondering
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:50:05 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: eetcarr@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Sagat = Shoto? dont seem like it
>
>
> On 12 February 2014 13:48, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In my head
>
> projectile + shoryu = shoto
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:44:48 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Must be because he has a dragon punch *lmao*
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Stephen Scheidel
> <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> VF Kage a shoto....... yeeeah no.
>
> On 12/02/2014, Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hmmm. I never bothered to watch it on normal res, at least now I can see
> if
> > for the first time in all its glory.
> >
> > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On
> > Behalf Of Wynand-Ben
> > Sent: 12 February 2014 1:10 PM
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > Did a random google...
> >
> > Never realised the re-released Planetes on Blu ray. (Ages ago aswell
> > lol..)
> >
> > I need that asap!
> > ________________________________
> > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:29:41 +0000
> > Nah, not watching yet, but also heard good things about it on the forums.
> > Is it done? I'm not going to start watching something that's not finished
> > yet.
> >
> > Speaking of which is that Killakill thing done yet?
> >
> >
> > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ilitirit Sama
> > Sent: 12 February 2014 10:28 AM
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > Anyone watching this?
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magi:_The_Labyrinth_of_Magic
> > Friend says it's good. I'll give it a watch.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Wynand-Ben
> > <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> > Mushishi was good
> >
> > Girls und Panzer was random fun (Tank battles as a highschool sport lol)
> >
> > I could never get into Fairy Tail..
> > ________________________________
> > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:23:49 +0000
> >
> >
> http://www.moetron.com/2014/02/08/spring-2014-visual-guide-anime-schedule-pv-collection/
> >
> > New JoJo and Mushishi that I'll probably check out eventually.
> >
> > Also Girls und Panzer OVA and the last of the Freezing Vibrations OVAs
> for
> > the fanservice side.
> >
> > Not sure what the new Fairy Tail thing is about.
> >
> >
> > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >]
> > On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben
> > Sent: 12 February 2014 10:20 AM
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > Most of them bitched about the plot in the first 2 aswell.
> >
> > I found them acceptable...
> > ________________________________
> > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:49:58 +0000
> > Same here.
> >
> > What's killing me is that Paas was saying that he's read reviews and they
> > say the gameplay is all good, but the story is a bit meh. The story is
> the
> > main reason I play FF.
> >
> > Meh, I'm back at work today. Had a meeting with a client at 9am. Got out
> of
> > bed around 8am. Yawn.
> >
> > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben
> > Sent: 11 February 2014 10:08 PM
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > I will probably be grabbing it...
> >
> > :P
> > ________________________________
> > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:06:45 +0200
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Just you.
> >
> > On 11 February 2014 21:10, sameegh jardine
> > <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > So who's getting FF13:Lightning returns?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> > <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > Thank goodness I'm not an experienced player.
> > I just read Ilitirit's mind, and then Ultra.
> > On 11 Feb 2014 19:56, "Ilitirit Sama"
> > <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > Because experienced players know when and when not to backdash.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:58 PM, G B
> > <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > That option select nonsense... ugh. I used them for a week but I never
> once
> > got a free hit. Stopped using it since.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:57 PM, G B
> > <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah. I think some of it is also attributed to me thinking that SF is so
> > knockdown-setup/unblockable based that... its all I look for. Well, at
> least
> > what I look for from my opponent, because I don't know any real setups
> aside
> > from jump in with hp (which works, LOL).
> > From what you've told me about playing Sakura, the only things I kept was
> > 'use st.hk<http://st.hk> as a poke', 'ex tatsu -> ultra 1', 'uryo
> knockdown
> > setup' and 'cr.hp if they jump'. I'd say 'don't jump' but LOL, I still do
> > that without even thinking about it, :-).
> > ...and basically, that is all I need to win matches. or its least, to
> put up
> > a fight. The rest of the stuff I react to as we play. That's why I'm
> > 'twitchy', especially when the game is slow. That's when the random
> tatsus
> > come out or I start jumping, etc, the game can start picking up again, to
> > the pace I like/used to play at.
> > I will say that dealing with these many hard knockdown's and ambiguity of
> > jump-in moves is probably the biggest challenge I've had to face in SF.
> In
> > KOF, getting a hard knockdown rather is rather rare and obviously, with
> CD
> > blow backs and escape rolls, getting a breather is a bit simpler.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> in
> > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
> to
> > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> it. If
> > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or
> > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
> and
> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
> subject
> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
> > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of
> > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services
> > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct
> and
> > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> > ________________________________
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> in
> > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
> to
> > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> it. If
> > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or
> > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
> and
> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
> subject
> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
> > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of
> > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services
> > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct
> and
> > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> >
> > ________________________________
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> in
> > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
> to
> > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> it. If
> > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or
> > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
> and
> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
> subject
> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
> > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of
> > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services
> > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct
> and
> > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> in
> > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
> to
> > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> it. If
> > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or
> > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
> and
> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
> subject
> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
> > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of
> > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services
> > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct
> and
> > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> >
> =========================================================================
> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ebrahiem Carr
> 079 499 4610
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ebrahiem Carr
> 079 499 4610
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
