Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:26:15 +0200
I hate Lee's D+4,4,4 and CH d+4 n4,3 series more than Bob's b+2,2...and not
to mention b+4...fucking hell. The Di Destroyer move b+4 -_____-"
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ok, i'm going to play Bob now steve :)
>
> Bob: "Who needs launchers to win anyway?"
>
>
> I think Jin is more related to Karate than the rest of the mishimas...then
> again, he's a Kazama now :/ Bob's playstyle is more similar to Jin/Kazama
> now than BR. In BR he had ewgf+1 for wiff punishment...now it only launches
> on CH...thank god. As if his arsenal isn't enough. D+1 is for noobs. His
> main nerf was his ewgf+1 which americans never do lolz.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Stephen Scheidel
> <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Bob is a piece of shit.
>>
>>
>> On 12 February 2014 14:48, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Bob in Tekken? He's considered a Mishima by most players.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think most people know that Shotokan is a type of Karate. I just use
>>> the term shoto for the copy/paste character design - Ryu/Ken/Akuma/Dan.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
>>> *Sent:* 12 February 2014 2:40 PM
>>>
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So, that would make Bob a shoto.
>>> I suppose it comes down to what one thinks it means.
>>>
>>> I only use "shoto" in a SF sense.
>>>
>>> On 12 Feb 2014 14:27, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> I know shotokan is karate style.
>>> But I very rarely take anything seriously when it applies to video
>>> games. Yuri = Taekwondo? Yea right lol.
>>>
>>>
>>> I consider terms like Shoto(SF) or Mishima(Tekken) to describe their
>>> ingame playstyles imo.
>>>
>>> "*Although in sf terms i think of shoto as fireball-tatsu-DP characters*
>>> "
>>> Thats pretty close to what I said.
>>> Could add tatsu to the "Shoto requirement" list.
>>> Projectile + Shoryu + tatsu = shoto
>>>
>>> That would be valid reason to exclude Sagat imo.
>>> Not that fact the apparently he does Mui Thai... and most definitely not
>>> Makoto
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:19:36 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> From: eetcarr@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Shoto is a fighting style, karate form. And i guess we can see who has
>>> that style, ken ryu akuma dan etc. Maybe makoto too I guess. Although in sf
>>> terms i think of shoto as fireball-tatsu-DP characters.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12 February 2014 14:12, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> As long as she gets shoves her foot in your face she can be in any
>>> category she pleases.
>>>
>>>
>>> So on semi related topic.
>>>
>>> Who here as order PCBs from anywhere before? Where etc?
>>> Or who can recommend a place?
>>>
>>> Should get my refund from FocusAttack for my missing order soon.
>>> May aswell order another PCB so long.
>>>
>>> Then I can finally join you okes for some SF action... and get my ass
>>> handed to me :P
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>
>>> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:04:25 +0000
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Makoto has her own 'bigfoot' category.
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>> *Sent:* 12 February 2014 2:03 PM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Makoto?
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:01:48 +0000
>>>
>>> Ah k
>>>
>>> So a character being referred to as a Shoto has nothing to do with how
>>> they play but how they look?
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:58:47 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> From: eetcarr@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Sagat mos a Mui Thai dude. Kick boxer. Shotokan is an actual discipline
>>> of Karate.
>>>
>>> So i guess you could say whoever wears a Karate outfit "gi" in the game
>>> are shoto or shoto based. Dan akuma ken ryu. Sakura?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> People, back me up here
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12 February 2014 13:55, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hehe
>>>
>>> I barely play the game :P
>>> Thats just how it seems to me.
>>>
>>> Serious question then
>>> What is a shoto?
>>> Why would Sagat not be a shoto?
>>>
>>> Just wondering
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:50:05 +0200
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>
>>> From: eetcarr@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sagat = Shoto? dont seem like it
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12 February 2014 13:48, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> In my head
>>>
>>> projectile + shoryu = shoto
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:44:48 +0200
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>
>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Must be because he has a dragon punch *lmao*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> VF Kage a shoto....... yeeeah no.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/02/2014, Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hmmm. I never bothered to watch it on normal res, at least now I can
>>> see if
>>> > for the first time in all its glory.
>>> >
>>> > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>>> > Behalf Of Wynand-Ben
>>> > Sent: 12 February 2014 1:10 PM
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> >
>>> > Did a random google...
>>> >
>>> > Never realised the re-released Planetes on Blu ray. (Ages ago aswell
>>> > lol..)
>>> >
>>> > I need that asap!
>>> > ________________________________
>>>
>>> > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> > Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:29:41 +0000
>>> > Nah, not watching yet, but also heard good things about it on the
>>> forums.
>>> > Is it done? I'm not going to start watching something that's not
>>> finished
>>> > yet.
>>> >
>>> > Speaking of which is that Killakill thing done yet?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >
>>> > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ilitirit Sama
>>> > Sent: 12 February 2014 10:28 AM
>>>
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> >
>>> > Anyone watching this?
>>> >
>>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magi:_The_Labyrinth_of_Magic
>>> > Friend says it's good. I'll give it a watch.
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Wynand-Ben
>>>
>>> > <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> > Mushishi was good
>>> >
>>> > Girls und Panzer was random fun (Tank battles as a highschool sport
>>> lol)
>>> >
>>> > I could never get into Fairy Tail..
>>> > ________________________________
>>>
>>> > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> > Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:23:49 +0000
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://www.moetron.com/2014/02/08/spring-2014-visual-guide-anime-schedule-pv-collection/
>>> >
>>> > New JoJo and Mushishi that I'll probably check out eventually.
>>> >
>>> > Also Girls und Panzer OVA and the last of the Freezing Vibrations OVAs
>>> for
>>> > the fanservice side.
>>> >
>>> > Not sure what the new Fairy Tail thing is about.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >
>>>
>>> > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>>
>>> > On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben
>>> > Sent: 12 February 2014 10:20 AM
>>>
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> >
>>> > Most of them bitched about the plot in the first 2 aswell.
>>> >
>>> > I found them acceptable...
>>> > ________________________________
>>>
>>> > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> > Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:49:58 +0000
>>> > Same here.
>>> >
>>> > What's killing me is that Paas was saying that he's read reviews and
>>> they
>>> > say the gameplay is all good, but the story is a bit meh. The story is
>>> the
>>> > main reason I play FF.
>>> >
>>> > Meh, I'm back at work today. Had a meeting with a client at 9am. Got
>>> out of
>>> > bed around 8am. Yawn.
>>> >
>>> > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >
>>> > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben
>>> > Sent: 11 February 2014 10:08 PM
>>>
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> >
>>> > I will probably be grabbing it...
>>> >
>>> > :P
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:06:45 +0200
>>> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>
>>> > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> > Just you.
>>> >
>>> > On 11 February 2014 21:10, sameegh jardine
>>>
>>> > <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > So who's getting FF13:Lightning returns?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
>>>
>>> > <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Thank goodness I'm not an experienced player.
>>> > I just read Ilitirit's mind, and then Ultra.
>>> > On 11 Feb 2014 19:56, "Ilitirit Sama"
>>>
>>> > <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Because experienced players know when and when not to backdash.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:58 PM, G B
>>>
>>> > <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > That option select nonsense... ugh. I used them for a week but I never
>>> once
>>> > got a free hit. Stopped using it since.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:57 PM, G B
>>>
>>> > <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Yeah. I think some of it is also attributed to me thinking that SF is
>>> so
>>> > knockdown-setup/unblockable based that... its all I look for. Well, at
>>> least
>>> > what I look for from my opponent, because I don't know any real setups
>>> aside
>>> > from jump in with hp (which works, LOL).
>>> > From what you've told me about playing Sakura, the only things I kept
>>> was
>>>
>>> > 'use st.hk<http://st.hk> as a poke', 'ex tatsu -> ultra 1', 'uryo
>>> knockdown
>>>
>>> > setup' and 'cr.hp if they jump'. I'd say 'don't jump' but LOL, I still
>>> do
>>> > that without even thinking about it, :-).
>>> > ...and basically, that is all I need to win matches. or its least, to
>>> put up
>>> > a fight. The rest of the stuff I react to as we play. That's why I'm
>>> > 'twitchy', especially when the game is slow. That's when the random
>>> tatsus
>>> > come out or I start jumping, etc, the game can start picking up again,
>>> to
>>> > the pace I like/used to play at.
>>> > I will say that dealing with these many hard knockdown's and ambiguity
>>> of
>>> > jump-in moves is probably the biggest challenge I've had to face in
>>> SF. In
>>> > KOF, getting a hard knockdown rather is rather rare and obviously,
>>> with CD
>>> > blow backs and escape rolls, getting a breather is a bit simpler.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>>> e-mail
>>> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>>> communication in
>>> > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
>>> send to
>>> > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
>>> it. If
>>> > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or
>>> > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
>>> prohibited and
>>> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
>>> subject
>>> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
>>> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
>>> > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business
>>> of
>>> > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>> >
>>> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free,
>>> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed,
>>> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>> >
>>> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>>> services
>>> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
>>> Swiss
>>> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>> independent
>>> > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services
>>> > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and
>>> > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about
>>> the
>>> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained
>>> > from your KPMG representative.
>>> >
>>> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> > AntiVirus software.
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>>> e-mail
>>> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>>> communication in
>>> > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
>>> send to
>>> > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
>>> it. If
>>> > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or
>>> > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
>>> prohibited and
>>> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
>>> subject
>>> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
>>> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
>>> > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business
>>> of
>>> > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>> >
>>> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free,
>>> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed,
>>> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>> >
>>> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>>> services
>>> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
>>> Swiss
>>> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>> independent
>>> > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services
>>> > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and
>>> > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about
>>> the
>>> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained
>>> > from your KPMG representative.
>>> >
>>> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> > AntiVirus software.
>>> >
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>>> e-mail
>>> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>>> communication in
>>> > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
>>> send to
>>> > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
>>> it. If
>>> > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or
>>> > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
>>> prohibited and
>>> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
>>> subject
>>> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
>>> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
>>> > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business
>>> of
>>> > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>> >
>>> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free,
>>> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed,
>>> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>> >
>>> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>>> services
>>> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
>>> Swiss
>>> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>> independent
>>> > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services
>>> > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and
>>> > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about
>>> the
>>> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained
>>> > from your KPMG representative.
>>> >
>>> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> > AntiVirus software.
>>> >
>>>
>>> > **********************************************************************
>>>
>>> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>>> e-mail
>>> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>>> communication in
>>> > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
>>> send to
>>> > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
>>> it. If
>>> > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or
>>> > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
>>> prohibited and
>>> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
>>> subject
>>> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
>>> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
>>> > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business
>>> of
>>> > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>> >
>>> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free,
>>> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed,
>>> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>> >
>>> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>>> services
>>> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
>>> Swiss
>>> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>> independent
>>> > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services
>>> > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and
>>> > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about
>>> the
>>> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained
>>> > from your KPMG representative.
>>> >
>>> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> > AntiVirus software.
>>> >
>>>
>>> =========================================================================
>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>>>
>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ebrahiem Carr
>>> 079 499 4610
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ebrahiem Carr
>>> 079 499 4610
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ebrahiem Carr
>>> 079 499 4610
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
