Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

  • From: Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:30:09 +0200

Only think i will get stuck with is probably the "links" in combos because
i'm not used to the move YET...it's the same principle with tekken...eg
pulling of Anna's df+2 qcf+1...you can't do it too soon because the system
will not register the qcf motion and it'll give you just a f+1..or Jaycee's
CH b+3 fc df+4,3 ff+1 combo..if you do it too slow then it drops, if you
execute the next move too fast than it doesn't register...that's probably
one of the many "links" in tekken. Move familiarity only comes from playing
the game.


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Injustice!
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:19:08 +0000
>
>
> Im pretty sure you are gna be stuck at doing qcf qcb qcfx2, dp motions.
> converting from tekken to sf is being comfortable in doing those motions.
> Ryu has all of these motions. once you have gone passed the "how do I do
> these motions phase" you can get on your way to playing the game and not
> focussing on the controller.
>
>
>
> http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/feb/10/early-entrance-numbers-socal-regionals-2014-game-ssf4-ae-v2012-umvc3-smash-blazblue-and-more/
>
> All the 3d fighters are scoring low numbers, except for injustice, dunno
> when that train is gna die. ST is still going strong. If ST was a person it
> would be Nick , old but still as fierce as ever. BB is gna be HYPE YALL
> WOOOOOOOOPPPP. so glad its getting the attention it deserves.
> SoCal Regionals 2014 early registration numbers
> *Numbers as of February 10, 2014 5:35 p.m. PST*
>
> Super Street Fighter 4 Arcade Edition v2012 - 173
> Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 - 105
> Blazblue: Chrono Phantasma - 66
> Injustice: Gods Among Us - 59
> Killer Instinct - 45
> Super Smash Bros. Melee - 36
> King of Fighters 13 - 35
> Street Fighter X Tekken - 34
> Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo - 31
> Divekick - 30
> Persona 4: Arena - 29
> Tekken Tag Tournament 2 - 28
> Guilty Gear Accent Core +R - 25
> Dead or Alive 5 Ultimate - 21
> Mortal Kombat 9 - 21
> Skullgirls - 21
> Soul Calibur 2 HD - 18
> Soul Calibur 5 - 18
> Mobile Suit Gundam Extreme: Vs Full Boost - 17
> Virtua Fighter 5: Final Showdown - 13
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:01:48 +0200
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Ah ok. No doubt on Ryu. But he's the cover boy for the game lolz
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> Ryu's not actually a "simple" character.  He's just easy to learn the game
> with because you're forced to learn everything to use him effectively.
>
> Boxer, Guile and Honda are more simple because they have movesets with
> less risk attached (Dash Punch, Sonic Boom, Head butt) so you don't have to
> worry so much about how and when to use these moves, and what your
> alternatives are when your opponent can shut these moves down.
>
> On the other hand, Ryu's fireball is only safe in certain situations.
> Learning to throw fireballs with Ryu is deceptively hard.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ryu can suck it. too mainstream lolz if you notice my characters in every
> fighting game is either characters that nobody plays, chinese or they have
> tits...haha best would be a combination of 3 XD oh and Capos :)
>
> but yes i know that ryu is pretty straight forward and probably the best
> to start out with for a new player. But meh, i'll take my chances with the
> characters i find interesting. I mean i didn't start tekken with mishimas
> or Asuka. I went for Capos, Julia, Nina/Anna, Raven, Yoshi and all the
> weirdos. Still don't know how to play mishimas and do ewgf haha can do
> "turtle ho" tho...aka slow ass f~d~df+2...fuck just frame.
>
> thanks for all the input. i've been reading lots but now i just need to
> put it into execution :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:37 PM, lindsey kiviets 
> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> not all shotos are eay to play.
>
> ryu is best to start with.
>
> ------------------------------
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:34:04 +0000
>
>
> Fuck that shit
>
> Was also told to start with a shoto.  Tried it and hated it.  Fuck all
> shotos.
>
> Just play who you like
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:28:22 +0000
>
> Di when learning sf4 , pickup ryu. best advice I can give you.
>
> I didn't like the game at al , but after I played with ryu for a lengthy
> period the game started to make sense. Chojin beat the living cwap outa me
> with his ryu , it forced me to level and learn the game.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:22:21 +0200
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Probably Yun.  You'll need a bit of practice for his Genei Jin combos but
> they are pretty straight forward.  No fireballs though.
>
> Juri is one of the best zoners in the game, but her projectile storing
> mechanic takes a long time to get used to.  Doesn't have a DP for anti-air,
> but has one of the best anti-air normals in the game.
>
> Dhalsim is quite simple to learn and very effective but his playstyle is
> unique.  His ground game is probably the least like Ryus.  No DP, but you
> can't really jump on him.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quick question, who in this list is "easy" to play (as in easy combo and
> simple mechanic/fighting philosophy eg. ryu? fireball projectile and
> zoning, shoryuken for anti air, etc)
>
> Juri, El Fuerte, Yun, Dhalsim?
>
> El Fuerte looks a bit complicated with his infinite combo :/ but i won't
> know until i try it out. Yun looks pretty straight forward. While i had
> some practice with Juri, so i kindda know her movelist.
>
> Gonna start SF4 :) while i wait for Elena.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, lindsey kiviets 
> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> doubt it , MS is too cheap.
>
> they didn't even fyt for DH when they got bought out.
>
> ------------------------------
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:21:01 +0000
>
>
> Well Tekken just isn't hype. Too few entries.
> I wonder if MS paid for KI to be there, like Warner Bros did with MK and
> Injustice.
>  *From*: lindsey kiviets [mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:03 AM South Africa Standard Time
> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>  he just mad salty, but its not as if Tekken wont be there at all. It will
> still be there just not on the main stage.
>
> I don't agree with Mr Wizards decision putting KI in though , Tekken
> could've been in there.
>  ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:41:17 +0200
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I agree with SAP, MM is a douch...
> On 10 Feb 2014 13:29, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  I remember him getting into a fight on TZ with Aken.
> It was quite funny with MM claiming that Aken didn't know how to play Kaz.
> Right...
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 10 February 2014 1:21 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>  Agree on MainMan...
>
>  On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Ashraf, just use June against him *lol*
>
>  MainMan is an idiot.
>
>  On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> FT5 salty runback? Sure thing.
>
> But I apologise in advance to the other guys if it's not fun to watch,
> since it's going to be a very one sided affair in my favor.
>
> MainMan butthurt about no TTT2 at Evo. I get it, but why diss Marvel?
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aldEXN1gJII
>  =========================================================================
> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>   ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Other related posts: