Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Ebrahiem Carr <eetcarr@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:08:25 +0200
learning to throw fireballs with ryu is kak hard.
On 11 February 2014 13:01, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ah ok. No doubt on Ryu. But he's the cover boy for the game lolz
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Ryu's not actually a "simple" character. He's just easy to learn the
>> game with because you're forced to learn everything to use him effectively.
>>
>> Boxer, Guile and Honda are more simple because they have movesets with
>> less risk attached (Dash Punch, Sonic Boom, Head butt) so you don't have to
>> worry so much about how and when to use these moves, and what your
>> alternatives are when your opponent can shut these moves down.
>>
>> On the other hand, Ryu's fireball is only safe in certain situations.
>> Learning to throw fireballs with Ryu is deceptively hard.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> ryu can suck it. too mainstream lolz if you notice my characters in
>>> every fighting game is either characters that nobody plays, chinese or they
>>> have tits...haha best would be a combination of 3 XD oh and Capos :)
>>>
>>> but yes i know that ryu is pretty straight forward and probably the best
>>> to start out with for a new player. But meh, i'll take my chances with the
>>> characters i find interesting. I mean i didn't start tekken with mishimas
>>> or Asuka. I went for Capos, Julia, Nina/Anna, Raven, Yoshi and all the
>>> weirdos. Still don't know how to play mishimas and do ewgf haha can do
>>> "turtle ho" tho...aka slow ass f~d~df+2...fuck just frame.
>>>
>>> thanks for all the input. i've been reading lots but now i just need to
>>> put it into execution :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:37 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> not all shotos are eay to play.
>>>>
>>>> ryu is best to start with.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:34:04 +0000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fuck that shit
>>>>
>>>> Was also told to start with a shoto. Tried it and hated it. Fuck all
>>>> shotos.
>>>>
>>>> Just play who you like
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:28:22 +0000
>>>>
>>>> Di when learning sf4 , pickup ryu. best advice I can give you.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't like the game at al , but after I played with ryu for a
>>>> lengthy period the game started to make sense. Chojin beat the living cwap
>>>> outa me with his ryu , it forced me to level and learn the game.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:22:21 +0200
>>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> Probably Yun. You'll need a bit of practice for his Genei Jin combos
>>>> but they are pretty straight forward. No fireballs though.
>>>>
>>>> Juri is one of the best zoners in the game, but her projectile storing
>>>> mechanic takes a long time to get used to. Doesn't have a DP for anti-air,
>>>> but has one of the best anti-air normals in the game.
>>>>
>>>> Dhalsim is quite simple to learn and very effective but his playstyle
>>>> is unique. His ground game is probably the least like Ryus. No DP, but
>>>> you can't really jump on him.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Quick question, who in this list is "easy" to play (as in easy combo
>>>> and simple mechanic/fighting philosophy eg. ryu? fireball projectile and
>>>> zoning, shoryuken for anti air, etc)
>>>>
>>>> Juri, El Fuerte, Yun, Dhalsim?
>>>>
>>>> El Fuerte looks a bit complicated with his infinite combo :/ but i
>>>> won't know until i try it out. Yun looks pretty straight forward. While i
>>>> had some practice with Juri, so i kindda know her movelist.
>>>>
>>>> Gonna start SF4 :) while i wait for Elena.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> doubt it , MS is too cheap.
>>>>
>>>> they didn't even fyt for DH when they got bought out.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:21:01 +0000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well Tekken just isn't hype. Too few entries.
>>>> I wonder if MS paid for KI to be there, like Warner Bros did with MK
>>>> and Injustice.
>>>> *From*: lindsey kiviets [mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>>>> *Sent*: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:03 AM South Africa Standard Time
>>>> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> *Subject*: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> he just mad salty, but its not as if Tekken wont be there at all. It
>>>> will still be there just not on the main stage.
>>>>
>>>> I don't agree with Mr Wizards decision putting KI in though , Tekken
>>>> could've been in there.
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:41:17 +0200
>>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> I agree with SAP, MM is a douch...
>>>> On 10 Feb 2014 13:29, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I remember him getting into a fight on TZ with Aken.
>>>> It was quite funny with MM claiming that Aken didn't know how to play
>>>> Kaz. Right...
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>>> *Sent:* 10 February 2014 1:21 PM
>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>
>>>> Agree on MainMan...
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ashraf, just use June against him *lol*
>>>>
>>>> MainMan is an idiot.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
>>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> FT5 salty runback? Sure thing.
>>>>
>>>> But I apologise in advance to the other guys if it's not fun to watch,
>>>> since it's going to be a very one sided affair in my favor.
>>>>
>>>> MainMan butthurt about no TTT2 at Evo. I get it, but why diss Marvel?
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aldEXN1gJII
>>>>
>>>> =========================================================================
>>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing
>>>> list.
>>>>
>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Ebrahiem Carr
079 499 4610
Other related posts:
