Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

  • From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:32:44 +0200

Best way to learn is to have someone explain what you're doing right/wrong
while you play.  Character choice is not very important.  Ryu is good for
understanding the metagame, but it won't help you learn the character you
wanna play eventually.


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:28 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Di when learning sf4 , pickup ryu. best advice I can give you.
>
> I didn't like the game at al , but after I played with ryu for a lengthy
> period the game started to make sense. Chojin beat the living cwap outa me
> with his ryu , it forced me to level and learn the game.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:22:21 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Probably Yun.  You'll need a bit of practice for his Genei Jin combos but
> they are pretty straight forward.  No fireballs though.
>
> Juri is one of the best zoners in the game, but her projectile storing
> mechanic takes a long time to get used to.  Doesn't have a DP for anti-air,
> but has one of the best anti-air normals in the game.
>
> Dhalsim is quite simple to learn and very effective but his playstyle is
> unique.  His ground game is probably the least like Ryus.  No DP, but you
> can't really jump on him.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quick question, who in this list is "easy" to play (as in easy combo and
> simple mechanic/fighting philosophy eg. ryu? fireball projectile and
> zoning, shoryuken for anti air, etc)
>
> Juri, El Fuerte, Yun, Dhalsim?
>
> El Fuerte looks a bit complicated with his infinite combo :/ but i won't
> know until i try it out. Yun looks pretty straight forward. While i had
> some practice with Juri, so i kindda know her movelist.
>
> Gonna start SF4 :) while i wait for Elena.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, lindsey kiviets 
> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> doubt it , MS is too cheap.
>
> they didn't even fyt for DH when they got bought out.
>
> ------------------------------
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:21:01 +0000
>
>
> Well Tekken just isn't hype. Too few entries.
> I wonder if MS paid for KI to be there, like Warner Bros did with MK and
> Injustice.
>  *From*: lindsey kiviets [mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:03 AM South Africa Standard Time
> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>  he just mad salty, but its not as if Tekken wont be there at all. It will
> still be there just not on the main stage.
>
> I don't agree with Mr Wizards decision putting KI in though , Tekken
> could've been in there.
>  ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:41:17 +0200
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I agree with SAP, MM is a douch...
> On 10 Feb 2014 13:29, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  I remember him getting into a fight on TZ with Aken.
> It was quite funny with MM claiming that Aken didn't know how to play Kaz.
> Right...
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 10 February 2014 1:21 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>  Agree on MainMan...
>
>  On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Ashraf, just use June against him *lol*
>
>  MainMan is an idiot.
>
>  On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> FT5 salty runback? Sure thing.
>
> But I apologise in advance to the other guys if it's not fun to watch,
> since it's going to be a very one sided affair in my favor.
>
> MainMan butthurt about no TTT2 at Evo. I get it, but why diss Marvel?
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aldEXN1gJII
>  =========================================================================
> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>   ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>

Other related posts: