Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

  • From: Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:17:51 +0200

I'm pretty sure there's no "easy" character in SF4. When it comes to
advance or pro play but out of the 4...who's more straight forward. In MK9
i play Mileena because she's straight forward. No need to do crazy Kabal's
b+1~fun cancel to be effective.

From vids, i gather yun is pretty straight forward. Just need to master
dive kick i guess? looks like it's one of his main offensive move.

Also been reading around, what's a reversal? mp+mk? what are options you
can do when you get knockdown from combos or moves and your opponent is
right next to you? because in tekken i would roll around but that's not the
case here in SF lolz


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Quick question, who in this list is "easy" to play (as in easy combo and
> simple mechanic/fighting philosophy eg. ryu? fireball projectile and
> zoning, shoryuken for anti air, etc)
>
> Juri, El Fuerte, Yun, Dhalsim?
>
> El Fuerte looks a bit complicated with his infinite combo :/ but i won't
> know until i try it out. Yun looks pretty straight forward. While i had
> some practice with Juri, so i kindda know her movelist.
>
> Gonna start SF4 :) while i wait for Elena.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, lindsey kiviets 
> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> doubt it , MS is too cheap.
>>
>> they didn't even fyt for DH when they got bought out.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:21:01 +0000
>>
>>
>> Well Tekken just isn't hype. Too few entries.
>> I wonder if MS paid for KI to be there, like Warner Bros did with MK and
>> Injustice.
>>  *From*: lindsey kiviets [mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent*: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:03 AM South Africa Standard Time
>> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> *Subject*: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>
>>
>>  he just mad salty, but its not as if Tekken wont be there at all. It
>> will still be there just not on the main stage.
>>
>> I don't agree with Mr Wizards decision putting KI in though , Tekken
>> could've been in there.
>>  ------------------------------
>> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:41:17 +0200
>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> I agree with SAP, MM is a douch...
>> On 10 Feb 2014 13:29, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  I remember him getting into a fight on TZ with Aken.
>>
>> It was quite funny with MM claiming that Aken didn't know how to play
>> Kaz. Right...
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>> *Sent:* 10 February 2014 1:21 PM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>
>>
>>
>> Agree on MainMan...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Ashraf, just use June against him *lol*
>>
>>
>>
>> MainMan is an idiot.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> FT5 salty runback? Sure thing.
>>
>> But I apologise in advance to the other guys if it's not fun to watch,
>> since it's going to be a very one sided affair in my favor.
>>
>> MainMan butthurt about no TTT2 at Evo. I get it, but why diss Marvel?
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aldEXN1gJII
>>
>> =========================================================================
>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>>
>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>   ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>
>

Other related posts: