I'm pretty sure there's no "easy" character in SF4. When it comes to advance or pro play but out of the 4...who's more straight forward. In MK9 i play Mileena because she's straight forward. No need to do crazy Kabal's b+1~fun cancel to be effective. From vids, i gather yun is pretty straight forward. Just need to master dive kick i guess? looks like it's one of his main offensive move. Also been reading around, what's a reversal? mp+mk? what are options you can do when you get knockdown from combos or moves and your opponent is right next to you? because in tekken i would roll around but that's not the case here in SF lolz On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Quick question, who in this list is "easy" to play (as in easy combo and > simple mechanic/fighting philosophy eg. ryu? fireball projectile and > zoning, shoryuken for anti air, etc) > > Juri, El Fuerte, Yun, Dhalsim? > > El Fuerte looks a bit complicated with his infinite combo :/ but i won't > know until i try it out. Yun looks pretty straight forward. While i had > some practice with Juri, so i kindda know her movelist. > > Gonna start SF4 :) while i wait for Elena. > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, lindsey kiviets > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> doubt it , MS is too cheap. >> >> they didn't even fyt for DH when they got bought out. >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:21:01 +0000 >> >> >> Well Tekken just isn't hype. Too few entries. >> I wonder if MS paid for KI to be there, like Warner Bros did with MK and >> Injustice. >> *From*: lindsey kiviets [mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx] >> *Sent*: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:03 AM South Africa Standard Time >> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> *Subject*: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> >> >> he just mad salty, but its not as if Tekken wont be there at all. It >> will still be there just not on the main stage. >> >> I don't agree with Mr Wizards decision putting KI in though , Tekken >> could've been in there. >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:41:17 +0200 >> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> I agree with SAP, MM is a douch... >> On 10 Feb 2014 13:29, "Donaldson, Alasdair" < >> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I remember him getting into a fight on TZ with Aken. >> >> It was quite funny with MM claiming that Aken didn't know how to play >> Kaz. Right... >> >> >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong >> *Sent:* 10 February 2014 1:21 PM >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> >> >> >> Agree on MainMan... >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Ashraf, just use June against him *lol* >> >> >> >> MainMan is an idiot. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ashraf Barendse < >> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> FT5 salty runback? Sure thing. >> >> But I apologise in advance to the other guys if it's not fun to watch, >> since it's going to be a very one sided affair in my favor. >> >> MainMan butthurt about no TTT2 at Evo. I get it, but why diss Marvel? >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aldEXN1gJII >> >> ========================================================================= >> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list. >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> >> ------------------------------ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> > >