Who's hard to play in GG? On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > BB wishes it had GGs cast > > GG cast is fucking godlike > > ------------------------------ > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:28:30 +0000 > > > I disagree, best cast of all fg belongs to bb. > > > > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:25:28 +0200 > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > GG has probably one of the best casts in any fg ever I think and > > shouldn't be changed. > > > > KI has like 5 characters and 3 of them are Jago. > > gtfo with this super demo fighter ftp bullshit and give us a full game > to buy. > > > > On 07/02/2014, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > don't get me wrong , all gg's have been great. except for isuka, > however, > > > making the game on a new console with better graphics is not going to > save > > > the game unless they give us different chracters > > > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:18:32 +0000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well since no one here has access to KI, the game isn't going anywhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > On Behalf Of sameegh jardine > > > > > > Sent: 07 February 2014 11:15 AM > > > > > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > > > > > > > Xrd > KI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:14 AM, lindsey kiviets < > lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > xrd is meh, theres notinhg really new. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:12:38 +0200 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > > > > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > It's a given! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Xrd is the where it's at in 2014. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Im just praying that the new Guilty Gear takes off properly... > > > > > > > > > > > > I really fucking hope so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All you bastards better get that game :P > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:53:28 +0200 > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > > > > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's easier to get the basics of a 2D fighter down, but mastering > something > > > like SF, Mahvel or KOF is no easy feat. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I find wavedashing easier than plinkdashing as an example. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Similarly, I find staple bnbs easier in TTT than I do in 2D fighters. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > 2d learning curve is faster than 3d. when you don't have to worry about > > > SS...it's pretty easy...there are a lot of tekken players who can play > 2d > > > games...but not many 2d game players who can play tekken. because if > you > > > don't ss in tekken > > > or 3d games...you will die. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When namco dumb downed the game/cut characters for T4...the lost ALL > the > > > hardcore players ...so that was clearly not the way to go. Actually > it's the > > > other way round. Tekken is losing casual players but hardcore players > are > > > still playing > > > and enjoying the game. Because with Tag partners, they get to > experiment > > > with other characters. Once they mastered the characters they play, > they > > > just partner their mains with other stuff to have fun. More hardcore > players > > > are appearing in the korean scene. > > > The korean players who were popular in BR but isn't present now are > either > > > grown up and has to work now or they're in the army hahaha BR some of > them > > > just stop playing because they didn't enjoy it as much. Also they love > the > > > tagging mechanic because they mastered > > > that long time ago in TTT1. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:37 AM, lindsey kiviets < > lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > and its still failed. > > > > > > > > > > > > 3d is old news. 2.5d to 2d is the way to go. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: > > > paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > > > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:33:23 +0000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully the use Tekken vs SF to test the waters a bit with possible > > > changes > > > > > > > > > > > > But yea, they need to dumb the game down somehow. > > > > > > > > > > > > SC5 needs to be popular lol > > > > > > They did a amazing job with that game imo. Think its the right > balance, not > > > too many characters, not too many moves etc. Much easier than tekken > to get > > > into. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: > > > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > > > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:26:24 +0000 > > > > > > You really think the complete failure of a game (TTT2 is dead in the > West) > > > is simply the result of nerfing one character? > > > > > > > > > > > > I have no idea what Namco could do to save the Tekken series. They're > losing > > > the hardcore players and the game's learning curve means that you're > not > > > getting enough new players > > > in either. Maybe they just need to reboot the series and make some > massive > > > changes. The last time they did something like that was T4, and while I > > > loved the game, it wasn't exactly loved either. > > > > > > > > > > > > From: > > > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > On Behalf Of Di Lhong > > > > > > Sent: 07 February 2014 9:57 AM > > > > > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > > > > > > > > > > Also in BR...tier list was stupid...if you're low tier vs a top tier > > > bob...it's really hard to win...while TTT2 is more balanced out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > T6BR evo is all about d+1 bob...spammable move all day...take that > out? they > > > all quit tekken and bitch about how the new TTT2 isn't as fun hahaha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, when it's best out of 5 format for top 8, it becomes a major > > > snorefest. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tekken not as fun to watch? false. lolz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair > > > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Looking good. It's sad that Tekken isn't there this year, especially > since > > > last year was so hype with Bronson running through everyone. TTT2 just > isn't > > > actually > > > that exciting to watch. > > > > > > > > > > > > Glad Injustice is still there. KI too. > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyways, Nick - any luck on the venue thing for Evo weekend? Uh, you > were > > > looking around for one, right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: > > > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets > > > > > > Sent: 07 February 2014 6:28 AM > > > > > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/feb/06/evo-2014-game-line-be-announced-tonight-iplaywinners-fray-catch-live-stream-here/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i agree with most of the line up however , to be fair , KI shouldnt be > > > there. its still early days and i doubt they'l be releasing extra 4 > > > characters befo evo. LOL @ sfxt. > > > BB is gna be sooo HYPE. > > > Official EVO 2014 game line up > > > > > > > > > * Ultra Street Fighter 4 > > > > > > * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 > > > > > > * Injustice: Gods Among Us > > > > > > * King of Fighters 13 > > > > > > * Killer Instinct > > > > > > * Blazblue Chrono Phantasma > > > > > > * Super Smash Bros. Melee (a spot is reserved for Melee but Nintendo > must > > > approve first. Discussions currently taking place) > > > > > > > > > > > > Additional notes: > > > > > > > > > > > > * Mr. Wizard stated that after EVO 2013, Tekken has dropped off a bit. > With > > > this year being the game's 20th anniversary, the EVO team didn't want > to > > > risk having a new version of Tekken be released, while an outdated > version > > > is on the game line up, so the franchise > > > was omitted this year. > > > > > > > > > > > > * Instead of having designated Road to EVO events, major tournaments > with a > > > certain amount of entrants will qualify for seeding points. Tournament > > > organizers of majors events will have to submit results to the EVO > team. Mr. > > > Wizard mentioned that the system > > > is still being worked out. These results will only apply for games on > the > > > EVO line up. > > > > > > > > > > > > * This year is the 20th anniversary of Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo. > > > Tournament of Legends will be back this year, and EVO will also be > holding > > > the 3v3, single elimination tournament, X-Mania US, the national Super > Turbo > > > event from Japan. > > > > > > > > > > > > * Exhibition matches aren't currently scheduled, but will be fit into > the > > > line up if they can get set up. Combo videos will return if the > community > > > makes them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * If Kokonoe were to stay the way she is now in Blazblue Chrono > Phantasma, > > > she would be banned at EVO. She will be allowed however, as a patch to > > > balance her is incoming. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * Developer panels will be returning this year. > > > > > > > > > > > > * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 will be 3 out of 5, as long as EVO > doesn't > > > have double the entrants as last year. Other games getting 3 out of 5 > in top > > > 8 will be dependent on how each game plays out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * Bring Your Own Console will be back this year, and there will be > > > designated areas for players who want to run side tournaments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 02:30:34 +0200 > > > > > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > > > > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > It's like Capcom and SFIV. They own the IP, Dimps developed it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Xrd! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:05:32 +0200 > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > > > > From: > > > gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > KI is shit anyway. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6 February 2014 21:26, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Handing out an Ip means you let go of the reigns. > > > > > > Good luck catching the horse again. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6 Feb 2014 21:20, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no , DH are just the developers of the game. > > > > > > > > > > > > MS asked them to make a fg . they were doing a goodjob and MS didnt > like > > > that. sigh, now i never get to play it. its probably all downhill from > here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:16:42 +0200 > > > > > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > > > > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Rare owned Killer Instinct, MicroScrotums owned Rare. > > > > > > Double Helix now owns Killer Instinct. > > > > > > Amazon now owns Double Helix. > > > > > > Sounds like a planned Coup. > > > > > > On 6 Feb 2014 20:53, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MS owns killer instinct. its not coming on ps anytime soon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 20:38:29 +0200 > > > > > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > > > > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Yeh, I was as surprised as my opponent. > > > > > > No scrap that, he had the look of someone whose soul had been stolen by > > > Shang Tsung. > > > > > > Cool guy, would've been neet if he spoke more. > > > > > > But then, compared to most, I spout verbal diarrhea like Rufus - > That's a > > > close 2nd to GB. > > > > > > I called the whole Killer Instinct "buy out" when the studio was born. > > > > > > Not sell on more than just 1 platform? > > > > > > That's akin to game programming suicide. I expect to see the game > coming to > > > all platforms. The great Enno has predixiated. > > > > > > On 6 Feb 2014 20:06, "Jack Steel" <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Great kof 13 vid.Tht anoaxe goro combo wicked finish.greatness! > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > > > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this > e-mail > > > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this > communication in > > > error, please address > > > with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original > sender, > > > then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the > > > intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action > > > taken or omitted to be taken in reliance > > > on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice > contained > > > in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the > > > governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and > other > > > information in this e-mail and any attachments > > > that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither > given > > > nor endorsed by it. > > > > > > > > > > > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or > error-free, > > > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, > destroyed, > > > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > > > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing > services > > > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a > Swiss > > > entity that serves as a coordinating entity > > > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG > > > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG > > > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each > describes > > > itself as such. Information about the > > > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained > > > from your KPMG representative. > > > > > > > > > > > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > > > AntiVirus software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > > > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this > e-mail > > > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this > communication in > > > error, please address > > > with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original > sender, > > > then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the > > > intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action > > > taken or omitted to be taken in reliance > > > on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice > contained > > > in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the > > > governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and > other > > > information in this e-mail and any attachments > > > that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither > given > > > nor endorsed by it. > > > > > > > > > > > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or > error-free, > > > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, > destroyed, > > > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > > > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing > services > > > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a > Swiss > > > entity that serves as a coordinating entity > > > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG > > > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG > > > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each > describes > > > itself as such. Information about the > > > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained > > > from your KPMG representative. > > > > > > > > > > > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > > > AntiVirus software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > > > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this > e-mail > > > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this > communication in > > > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," > send to > > > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of > it. If > > > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or > > > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is > prohibited and > > > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are > subject > > > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client > > > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this > > > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business > of > > > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > > > > > > > > > > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or > error-free, > > > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, > destroyed, > > > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > > > > > > > > > > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > > > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing > services > > > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a > Swiss > > > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of > independent > > > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services > > > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and > > > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about > the > > > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained > > > from your KPMG representative. > > > > > > > > > > > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > > > AntiVirus software. > > > > > ========================================================================= > > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list. > > > > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >