I think I nominated it as one of the mystery games for YDK Saturdays, I'm sure someone has it:P On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hopefully they release more characters tho...heard there's only 14 or > something :/ > > Ben you need to teach me the mechanics of the game again...haven't played > the game since it was released on ps2... > > Also does ANYONE have bloody roar 3? must play that game again :) > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:12 AM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> It's a given! >> >> Xrd is the where it's at in 2014. >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: >> >>> Im just praying that the new Guilty Gear takes off properly... >>> >>> I really fucking hope so >>> >>> >>> All you bastards better get that game :P >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:53:28 +0200 >>> >>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> >>> It's easier to get the basics of a 2D fighter down, but mastering >>> something like SF, Mahvel or KOF is no easy feat. >>> >>> I find wavedashing easier than plinkdashing as an example. >>> >>> Similarly, I find staple bnbs easier in TTT than I do in 2D fighters. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> 2d learning curve is faster than 3d. when you don't have to worry about >>> SS...it's pretty easy...there are a lot of tekken players who can play 2d >>> games...but not many 2d game players who can play tekken. because if you >>> don't ss in tekken or 3d games...you will die. >>> >>> When namco dumb downed the game/cut characters for T4...the lost ALL the >>> hardcore players ...so that was clearly not the way to go. Actually it's >>> the other way round. Tekken is losing casual players but hardcore players >>> are still playing and enjoying the game. Because with Tag partners, they >>> get to experiment with other characters. Once they mastered the characters >>> they play, they just partner their mains with other stuff to have fun. More >>> hardcore players are appearing in the korean scene. The korean players who >>> were popular in BR but isn't present now are either grown up and has to >>> work now or they're in the army hahaha BR some of them just stop playing >>> because they didn't enjoy it as much. Also they love the tagging mechanic >>> because they mastered that long time ago in TTT1. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:37 AM, lindsey kiviets >>> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: >>> >>> and its still failed. >>> >>> 3d is old news. 2.5d to 2d is the way to go. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:33:23 +0000 >>> >>> >>> Hopefully the use Tekken vs SF to test the waters a bit with possible >>> changes >>> >>> But yea, they need to dumb the game down somehow. >>> >>> SC5 needs to be popular lol >>> They did a amazing job with that game imo. Think its the right balance, >>> not too many characters, not too many moves etc. Much easier than tekken >>> to get into. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:26:24 +0000 >>> >>> You really think the complete failure of a game (TTT2 is dead in the >>> West) is simply the result of nerfing one character? >>> >>> I have no idea what Namco could do to save the Tekken series. They're >>> losing the hardcore players and the game's learning curve means that you're >>> not getting enough new players in either. Maybe they just need to reboot >>> the series and make some massive changes. The last time they did something >>> like that was T4, and while I loved the game, it wasn't exactly loved >>> either. >>> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong >>> *Sent:* 07 February 2014 9:57 AM >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>> >>> Also in BR...tier list was stupid...if you're low tier vs a top tier >>> bob...it's really hard to win...while TTT2 is more balanced out. >>> >>> T6BR evo is all about d+1 bob...spammable move all day...take that >>> out? they all quit tekken and bitch about how the new TTT2 isn't as fun >>> hahaha >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Well, when it's best out of 5 format for top 8, it becomes a major >>> snorefest. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Tekken not as fun to watch? false. lolz >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Looking good. It's sad that Tekken isn't there this year, especially >>> since last year was so hype with Bronson running through everyone. TTT2 >>> just isn't actually that exciting to watch. >>> >>> Glad Injustice is still there. KI too. >>> >>> Anyways, Nick - any luck on the venue thing for Evo weekend? Uh, you >>> were looking around for one, right? >>> >>> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets >>> *Sent:* 07 February 2014 6:28 AM >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>> >>> >>> http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/feb/06/evo-2014-game-line-be-announced-tonight-iplaywinners-fray-catch-live-stream-here/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> i agree with most of the line up however , to be fair , KI shouldnt be >>> there. its still early days and i doubt they'l be releasing extra 4 >>> characters befo evo. LOL @ sfxt. >>> BB is gna be sooo HYPE. Official EVO 2014 game line up >>> * Ultra Street Fighter 4 >>> * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 >>> * Injustice: Gods Among Us >>> * King of Fighters 13 >>> * Killer Instinct >>> * Blazblue Chrono Phantasma >>> * Super Smash Bros. Melee (a spot is reserved for Melee but Nintendo >>> must approve first. Discussions currently taking place) >>> >>> *Additional notes:* >>> >>> * Mr. Wizard stated that after EVO 2013, Tekken has dropped off a bit. >>> With this year being the game's 20th anniversary, the EVO team didn't want >>> to risk having a new version of Tekken be released, while an outdated >>> version is on the game line up, so the franchise was omitted this year. >>> >>> * Instead of having designated Road to EVO events, major tournaments >>> with a certain amount of entrants will qualify for seeding points. >>> Tournament organizers of majors events will have to submit results to the >>> EVO team. Mr. Wizard mentioned that the system is still being worked out. >>> These results will only apply for games on the EVO line up. >>> >>> * This year is the 20th anniversary of Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo. >>> Tournament of Legends will be back this year, and EVO will also be holding >>> the 3v3, single elimination tournament, X-Mania US, the national Super >>> Turbo event from Japan. >>> >>> * Exhibition matches aren't currently scheduled, but will be fit into >>> the line up if they can get set up. Combo videos will return if the >>> community makes them. >>> >>> * If Kokonoe were to stay the way she is now in Blazblue Chrono >>> Phantasma, she would be banned at EVO. She will be allowed however, as a >>> patch to balance her is incoming. >>> >>> * Developer panels will be returning this year. >>> >>> * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 will be 3 out of 5, as long as EVO >>> doesn't have double the entrants as last year. Other games getting 3 out of >>> 5 in top 8 will be dependent on how each game plays out. >>> >>> * Bring Your Own Console will be back this year, and there will be >>> designated areas for players who want to run side tournaments. >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 02:30:34 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> It's like Capcom and SFIV. They own the IP, Dimps developed it. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Xrd! >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:05:32 +0200 >>> >>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> KI is shit anyway. >>> >>> On 6 February 2014 21:26, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Handing out an Ip means you let go of the reigns. >>> Good luck catching the horse again. >>> On 6 Feb 2014 21:20, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> no , DH are just the developers of the game. >>> >>> MS asked them to make a fg . they were doing a goodjob and MS didnt like >>> that. sigh, now i never get to play it. its probably all downhill from here. >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:16:42 +0200 >>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Rare owned Killer Instinct, MicroScrotums owned Rare. >>> Double Helix now owns Killer Instinct. >>> Amazon now owns Double Helix. >>> Sounds like a planned Coup. >>> On 6 Feb 2014 20:53, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> MS owns killer instinct. its not coming on ps anytime soon >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 20:38:29 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Yeh, I was as surprised as my opponent. >>> No scrap that, he had the look of someone whose soul had been stolen by >>> Shang Tsung. >>> Cool guy, would've been neet if he spoke more. >>> But then, compared to most, I spout verbal diarrhea like Rufus - That's >>> a close 2nd to GB. >>> I called the whole Killer Instinct "buy out" when the studio was born. >>> Not sell on more than just 1 platform? >>> That's akin to game programming suicide. I expect to see the game >>> coming to all platforms. The great Enno has predixiated. >>> On 6 Feb 2014 20:06, "Jack Steel" <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > >>> > Great kof 13 vid.Tht anoaxe goro combo wicked finish.greatness! >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >