To pettin is to cheat wwrd what would raphamon do. On 06/02/2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > dont pettin my bru > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Stephen Scheidel > <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> I prefer to coward. >> >> On 06/02/2014, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > there is no other way to play >> > >> > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:50:09 +0000 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Lol LB. You play SF like I play Diablo - Facetank and hope for the >> > best. >> If >> > you're dying, just hit harder. >> > >> > >> > >> > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> > On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets >> > >> > Sent: 06 February 2014 2:45 PM >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > iin order of easiest to hardest >> > >> > >> > >> > baiting >> > >> > inception >> > >> > reaction ---> I play in this area. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 14:40:39 +0200 >> > >> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > Yeah it's baiting at the simplest level, but with anything more complex >> then >> > it's like Inception. You put an idea into their head and make them >> > think >> > they wanted to do it. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:32 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > .........baited feeling x rated >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 14:24:42 +0200 >> > >> > >> > >> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > From: >> > ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Here's an example that even you should be able to grasp: >> > >> > 3rd Strike - you play Chun, I'm Ken. Every time I whiff a move, you >> > try >> to >> > whiff punish. So I whiff >> > st.lk, see you try to whiff punish, and then Super'd you. You think it >> was >> > just reaction, but I created a situation that made you react in a >> > certain >> > way. In other words, I "made" you press that button. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > If your >> > cr.mk is getting swept all the time then your spacing and footsies in >> > general suck. The idea is to do it out of range so that the only way >> the DP >> > will come out is when the opponent walks forward. >> > >> > To understand why your footsies suck you will also need to understand >> how I >> > read your fireball once at quarter screen distance with Ken then >> > Ultra'd >> > through it. >> > You said you couldn't understand how I read that since you didn't >> > throw >> a >> > fireball the entire round. What you don't understand is that I made >> > you >> > throw that fireball. It sounds crazy, but it's true, and the same >> concept >> > applies to footsies, except the reactions >> > you try to get from your opponent are much more subtle. There's a >> segment >> > in the Infilitration vs Tokido matchup where Infiltration starts >> > walking >> > back and forward. The only reason he does it is to get Tokido to do >> > the >> > same thing. As soon as Tokido does >> > it, he walks forward and sweeps him. I'll post the clip later if I >> > can >> > find it. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:31 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Meh, the >> > cr.mk thing was cool but it just gets swept all the time or something >> like >> > that. Too risky on block too, dp is really unsafe. I'd rather toss out >> the >> > st.hk than the >> > cr.mk, because you can't really focus it, unless I'm really close or >> > the >> > focus attack is really good (Dudley), so its mindless poking. >> > >> > >> > >> > Thats why I do it twice or more, without even thinking, because if you >> focus >> > and release, you focus will whiff and I'll kick you again for x2 >> > st.hk dmg. If it hits, most people actually advance or just don't >> realise >> > how fast and far-reaching it is, and I get another hit again, sometimes >> I'll >> > just do it again, just like jumping. After getting sick of eating >> > that, most people jump and then get blown up by cr.hp. Its all I have >> > to >> > do. >> > >> > Then somewhere in between I left the frustration kick in and wait for >> > an >> > opening for some combos and yay, I win. >> > >> > EX Tatsu stuff is really bad though, besides on block, I just do that >> > to >> > advance or have nothing better to do. Unless the spacing is impeccable, >> > using it to beat >> > fireballs is not so great. Sometimes only one of the kicks it and it >> leave >> > you open or you land somewhere in front. Its a great option but if I >> could >> > read the fireball, I might as well jump in instead, the outcome is the >> same >> > anyway. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Besides the fact that that's a REALLY stupid way of approaching a >> > match, >> why >> > don't you have the same approach to footsies? >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > "I figure if I always poke, you won't punish me every time" >> > >> > cr.mk is a GREAT poke because of the conversion into big damage >> > (shouken >> > FADC into most boring combo ever). >> > st.hk controls so much space and is very hard to whiff punish. Plus >> > she >> > also has that retarded Focus Attack. If I react with tatsu using Ryu, >> she >> > ducks under it. If I react with >> > cr.mk xx DP, she hops over it. Such a dumb character... >> > >> > If you have trouble getting in on someone like Seth, just walk forward >> and >> > block. He doesn't have the ground mobility to keep up in footsies so >> he'll >> > either >> > dash forward into shenanigans, do the Electrolux special (you can >> > react >> to >> > this), dash back to create space, or jump. If you have trouble with >> > fireballs, try EX Tatsu instead of jumping. >> > >> > >> > >> > vs. Rose slide, just do Focus Attack. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:05 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > You guys make me jump -_- >> > >> > If I don't jump and you actually fireball, then I'm like "fuck, I >> > should >> > have jumped". >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > meh, I figure if I always jump, you won't AA every single time, you >> probably >> > going to expect me to change what I'm going to do, sometime. I just >> > need >> to >> > get in once or twice to win with Sakura. One good combo and one ex >> > tatsu >> > into U1. :-) >> > >> > >> > But you guys like Steve,Rod and Salie are too stubborn, or more >> > stubborn >> > than I am! "Oh, this is working. Ok, why change? Make me." -_- Then I >> just >> > go in and >> > see what happens :-D >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > And yet you keep jumping in recklessly and getting punished... >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:55 AM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > Yup, because that move lost me life. Lets never do that again. >> > >> > Sap, I'm doing Soul Spiral backdash and slides forever now and going to >> win. >> > Rose unfair. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Either that or I'm doing silly stuff for like 30 matches, which is >> > probably what happened. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > FTFY. >> > >> > >> > >> > Told you many times before, you play too conservatively during >> > footsies. >> > You get whiff punished once and then you never press that button again. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:43 AM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > GG Sap. Please die and burn in hell with Rose. >> > >> > Seriously, its feels 7-3 to Rose. >> > >> > >> > >> > Either that or I'm doing silly stuff for like 30 matches, which is >> > impossible. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > *lol* Dragonball Z: Hyper Dimension. Check out the matches :) >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > http://www.youtube.com/user/PhoenixSA >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > >> > wavedashing? what game is this? >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Wait until you see the wavedashing *lol* >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > I didn't even know that was possible :) >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > *lol* >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Stephen Scheidel >> > <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > That Lumi combo is so legit ! >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On 5 February 2014 18:06, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Thanks dude ! >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On 5 February 2014 16:31, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > >> > All the DBZ vids are up :) Hope you guys enjoy reliving the hype *lol* >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair >> > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > Reading in the Barb thread and some guy has made a pure thorns Barb. >> > The >> > point was to see if he could kill opponents without pressing a single >> button >> > - combo >> > of thorns + life regen. >> > >> > He tested the barb against Diablo in MP0. It took half an hour for >> Diablo to >> > die, but it worked. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > From: >> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> > On Behalf Of Di Lhong >> > >> > Sent: 05 February 2014 3:48 PM >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > >> > >> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Who needs GTA when you have Goat Simulator! >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgTQglGvNUs >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair >> > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > http://myanimelist.net/anime/10456/Kyoukaisenjou_no_Horizon >> > >> > >> > >> > Some guy on one of my forums recommended it. >> > >> > I think I'm going to delete that Unbreakable Machine thing. The >> > complete >> > lack of originality grates. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > From: >> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> > On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben >> > >> > Sent: 05 February 2014 3:39 PM >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Horizon does not ring a bell... >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > From: >> > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:37:13 +0000 >> > >> > Yeah, since games overtook movies as the biggest media profit area, the >> > situation was bound to change. >> > >> > >> > >> > Hey Paas, do you have Horizon lying around? I mean the anime series. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > From: >> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> > On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben >> > >> > Sent: 05 February 2014 3:32 PM >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > When cost to produce games increased exponentially but game prices stay >> > essentially the same for over a decade... people start getting >> > creative >> :P >> > >> > >> > >> > In short >> > >> > >> > >> > Money happened >> > >> >> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:23:13 +0200 >> > >> >> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> >> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >> > >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> >> >> > >> >> What ever happened to just releasing a game? >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On 05/02/2014, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> >> > Hahaha >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > On 05/02/2014, Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> >> I understand that it's not a full game. I'm sure USD30 is a real >> >> >> bargain >> > >> >> >> for >> > >> >> >> a 5min speedrun game. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Maybe if you pre-order it you get a free picture of Kojima pulling >> the >> > >> >> >> story >> > >> >> >> out of his ass. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> >> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> > >> >> >> On >> > >> >> >> Behalf Of Wynand-Ben >> > >> >> >> Sent: 05 February 2014 3:10 PM >> > >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> >> >> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Well wasnt going to be a "big" demo from the start? >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Kinda like the ship segment from MGS2. Cant remember it ever being >> > >> >> >> advertised as a proper game. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Thats how I understood it from the start... >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ >> > >> >> >> From: >> > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> >> >> To: >> > cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> >> >> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> >> >> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:04:32 +0000 >> > >> >> >> Lol, 5min for a speedrun. No doubt 4 of those 5 minutes are spend >> >> >> hiding. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Two hours of game, with 5minutes of actual gameplay. Yup, sounds >> >> >> like >> > >> >> >> MGS... >> > >> >> >> Hopefully they will have a heavy pseudo-intellectual storyline to >> >> >> go >> > >> >> >> along >> > >> >> >> with it. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> From: >> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> >> >> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ilitirit Sama >> > >> >> >> Sent: 05 February 2014 2:50 PM >> > >> >> >> To: >> > cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> >> >> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Disappointment of the week >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> http://metro.co.uk/2014/02/05/metal-gear-solid-v-ground-zeroes-is-only-2-hours-long-4291338/ >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Ilitirit Sama >> > >> >> >> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> > >> >> >> Wow, someone released the Art of Fighting source code (without >> assets, >> >> >> of >> > >> >> >> course) >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> https://app.box.com/s/5on2e593tqt2c8ketc68 >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Ilitirit Sama >> > >> >> >> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> > >> >> >> Watched it live. It will be on their YouTube channel in the next >> >> >> day >> >> >> or >> > >> >> >> so. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9yHaajDKNc >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Sean Carrington >> > >> >> >> <theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx>> >> >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> Link -_- >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Ilitirit Sama >> > >> >> >> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> > >> >> >> Did anyone watch Infiltration vs Tokido? Highest level of Akuma >> >> >> play >> > >> >> >> I've >> > >> >> >> seen. SFIV is relatively slow but it's so demanding on fast >> >> >> reactions >> > >> >> >> and >> > >> >> >> situational awareness. In one situation Tokido did a combo into >> >> >> reset >> > >> >> >> and >> > >> >> >> which he knew would trade if Infiltration did a DP. He did this >> >> >> because >> > >> >> >> he >> > >> >> >> was calculating the stun values in his head. Infiltration went for >> the >> > >> >> >> DP, >> > >> >> >> it traded and Tokido got the dizzy. So pro. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair >> > >> >> >> <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >> >> >> > >> >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> Sounds like he was having a pretty horrible nightmare. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> From: >> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> >> >> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] >> > >> >> >> On Behalf Of Ilitirit Sama >> > >> >> >> Sent: 05 February 2014 1:11 PM >> > >> >> >> To: >> > cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Go back to sleep. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Sean Carrington >> > >> >> >> <theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx>> >> >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> Did someone say SFxT ? >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, G B >> > >> >> >> <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> > >> >> >> Gamernet House, 45 Salisbury Road, Cape Town, ZA >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Jack Steel >> > >> >> >> <orichih@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:orichih@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> > >> >> >> Let me know were as it is my 1st time >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> On 2/5/14, Jack Steel <orichih@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:orichih@xxxxxxxxx>> >> > >> >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >>> Reason y i have xbox and ps3 was 4 kof 13 but i did not get copy i >> >> >>> had >> > >> >> >>> sfxt found 1 sa player further no1.that's y i was gears of war >> player >> > >> >> >>> now im stuck on ggpo 4 competition toying around. >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> On 2/5/14, Jack Steel >> >> >>> <orichih@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:orichih@xxxxxxxxx>> >> > >> >> >>> wrote: >> > >> >> >>>> Im gonna start of slow c im new 2 group im sa and friendly .i had >> >> >>>> a >> > >> >> >>>> copy of kof 12 but i need a copy of kof 13 i got xbox and ps3 and >> >> >>>> will >> > >> >> >>>> soon upgrade graphic card 4 pc. To cover most platforms c what >> games >> >> >>>> r >> > >> >> >>>> famous 2 play.train.and thn c it sound interesting.ill try 2 come >> >> >>>> 2 >> > >> >> >>>> belville 2 get use 2 the flow. >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> On 2/5/14, Ilitirit Sama >> > >> >> >>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> >> > >> >> >>>> wrote: >> > >> >> >>>>> I remember playing you on GGPO. My user name is ilitirit but I >> >> >>>>> don't >> > >> >> >>>>> play >> > >> >> >>>>> on there any more cos my GGPO doesn't work. We play on SupArc >> >> >>>>> now. >> > >> >> >>>>> It's >> > >> >> >>>>> like GGPO but you can play against 3 people in a lobby if you >> >> >>>>> want >> >> >>>>> to. >> > >> >> >>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>> Are you going to come to the Saturday sessions in Bellville? >> > >> >> >>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Jack Steel >> > >> >> >>>>> <orichih@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:orichih@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> > >> >> >>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> My ggpo user is goku1up- and finalfighter i smashed many ggpo >> >> >>>>>> kof >> > >> >> >>>>>> 2002 >> > >> >> >>>>>> players avk team sa and other locals they tried all cheats 2 no >> > >> >> >>>>>> profit >> > >> >> >>>>>> i hope to get smashed in kof13 and other platforms.smash or b >> > >> >> >>>>>> smashed"d.^_^;) >> > >> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> On 2/3/14, Nicholas Robertson-Muir >> > >> >> >>>>>> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> > >> >> >>>>>> > I wonder if they would have done the same if it was me? >> > >> >> >>>>>> > >> > >> >> >>>>>> > Or would they be all like... call the hospital, this man is >> >> >>>>>> > about >> > >> >> >>>>>> > to >> > >> >> >>>>>> have a >> > >> >> >>>>>> > heart-attack. >> > >> >> >>>>>> > >> > >> >> >>>>>> > >> > >> >> >>>>>> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Sean Carrington >> > >> >> >>>>>> > <theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >> theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >>>>>> > >> > >> >> >>>>>> >> I think I'm troubled. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >> I might have cursed one too many times at the GM of Telkom >> > >> >> >>>>>> >> Claremont. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >> I was escorted out of the mall by security... *facepalm*. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >> On 03 Feb 2014 4:02 PM, "G B" >> > >> >> >>>>>> >> <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> > >> >> >>>>>> >> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>> "subjective prices" - I mean that they are priced >> >> >>>>>> >>> subjectively... >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>> See >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>> DeBont and Thaler (1985)'s classic overreaction hypothesis, >> or >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>> google >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>> anything on herding, as a basic yet 'oh so' applicable >> >> >>>>>> >>> example. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, G B >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>> <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> Never heard of Peter Stone. Can you send me the title of >> >> >>>>>> >>>> the >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> article >> > >> >> >>>>>> or >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> the pdf? I'd love to read it. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> The reason why its frequently mentioned/used within the >> Hedge >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> Fund >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> industry is due to how rapidly HFs change, as can be seen >> >> >>>>>> >>>> in >> >> >>>>>> >>>> the >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> quant >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> meltdown of 2007 (In three days, you could've made R1 turn >> >> >>>>>> >>>> into >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> R500, >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> if >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> you were at the right place at the right time). Testing >> >> >>>>>> >>>> for >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> adaption >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> here >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> is extremely interesting, and saves you years of work. HFs >> is >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> also >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> the >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> canary in the coal mine in world of finance. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> You are spot on with the over-fitting issue. :-) I >> >> >>>>>> >>>> corrected >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> this >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> when >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> I >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> implemented mine. When using fundamental analysis, they'd >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> implement >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> like, >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> 15 different fundamental metrics, of which maybe 4 or 5 >> >> >>>>>> >>>> have >> >> >>>>>> >>>> any >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> statical >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> significance. In fact, certain researchers went to the >> extent >> >> >>>>>> >>>> of >> > >> >> >>>>>> running >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> a >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> GA to select the variables for "best-fit" first... which >> >> >>>>>> >>>> is >> >> >>>>>> >>>> akin >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> to >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> data-mining in the sense that they are finding the best >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> variables >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> that >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> fit >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> with the given data BEFORE running the algorithm. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> And yes, the evolutionary algorithm is trained using a >> >> >>>>>> >>>> data-base >> > >> >> >>>>>> first, >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> before it goes live. Typically, the GA selects the >> >> >>>>>> >>>> variables >> >> >>>>>> >>>> and >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> the >> > >> >> >>>>>> ANN >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> is >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> what does all the decision making. Having the computer >> decide >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> what >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> it >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> should do for both is unwise, or at least, I think so. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> Like I said, you put garbage in, you going to get garbage >> >> >>>>>> >>>> out, >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> that >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> is >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> how it works with these black box machines, so yeah, >> >> >>>>>> >>>> people >> >> >>>>>> >>>> have >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> used >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> GA's >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> before, but like we both mentioned, how you program it and >> >> >>>>>> >>>> I >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> would >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> is >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> totally different, which means it would learn differently, >> >> >>>>>> >>>> just >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> as >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> we >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> do. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> You also mentioned "Buy-Low/Sell-High" when there are >> >> >>>>>> >>>> economic >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> shocks, >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> which is a great strategy, sure, but stock prices will >> adjust >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> accordingly >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> anyway, so while they may be cheaper than usual, they >> >> >>>>>> >>>> won't >> > >> >> >>>>>> necessarily >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> be >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> mispriced, which is what I'm interested in. I can't always >> >> >>>>>> >>>> wait >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> for >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> some >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> kind of external economic movement to make money. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> As you've said, I don't want to match the market at all, >> else >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> I'd >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> go >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> passive. Stocks are priced at the value that the market >> >> >>>>>> >>>> values >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> it >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> at >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> and >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> those are often subjective prices, more often than not.If >> >> >>>>>> >>>> I >> >> >>>>>> >>>> had >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> a >> > >> >> >>>>>> basic >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> program to initiate buy/sell commands based on whether a >> >> >>>>>> >>>> stock >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> falls >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> below/above a certain price and expect it to earn money, >> >> >>>>>> >>>> I'd >> >> >>>>>> >>>> be >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> a >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> billionaire by now. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Ilitirit Sama >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>wrote: >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> @GB >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> I did some reading up on using GA against the stock >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> market. >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> It >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> seems >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> some Hedge Funds use them already, but most of these >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> funds >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> are >> > >> >> >>>>>> already >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> defunct (probably not because of the use of GAs though). >> Was >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> that >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> paper >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> you mentioned by Peter Stone? It answers a lot of the >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> questions >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> I >> > >> >> >>>>>> had. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> It >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> seems the evolution of the ANN happens way before the >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> data >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> is >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> run >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> on >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> live >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> data. Stock Market GAs also tend to suffer from >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> "over-fitting", >> > >> >> >>>>>> which >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> is >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> something I also mentioned. They try to adjust to past >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> performance >> > >> >> >>>>>> in >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> order to generate an expected result. However, most GAs >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> don't >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> take >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> into >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> account random fluctuations in the result, so they fail >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> miserably >> > >> >> >>>>>> when >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> they >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> try to derive patterns from the data. The best they can >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> do >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> is >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> to >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> try >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> to >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> match the curve, which of course is very bad. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ilitirit Sama >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>wrote: >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> He needs to confirm the subscription. The link should be >> at >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> the >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> bottom of any of the admins' messages. Give me his email >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> address. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, lindsey kiviets >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> > wrote: >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> lol, >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> @ilitrit , gimme th fgc link again please.i added >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hilton >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> myself >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> , >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> and >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> it seems he is not added to the mails. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------ >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 13:59:14 +0200 >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> From: >> > ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> To: >> > cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> *lol* Guys will just have to put their cellphones where >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> can >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> see >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> em, >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> or else :P Scumbaggery at it's finest :P >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm busy editing the vids. Will start uploading soon :) >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Ashraf Barendse < >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> The first rule of Random FG club is... >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Gohan is a charge character. I know this because LB >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> knows >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> this. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >> ========================================================================= >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Community >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> mailing >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> list. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> > >> > >> >> >>>>>> >> ========================================================================= >> > >> >> >>>>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community >> >> >>>>>> mailing >> > >> >> >>>>>> list. >> > >> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >> > >> >> >>>>>> >> > >> >> >>>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >> ========================================================================= >> > >> >> >> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing >> >> >> list. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ >> > >> >> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> > >> >> >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this >> > >> >> >> e-mail >> > >> >> >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this >> >> >> communication >> > >> >> >> in >> > >> >> >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," >> >> >> send >> > >> >> >> to >> > >> >> >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies >> >> >> of >> >> >> it. >> > >> >> >> If >> > >> >> >> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> >> >> distribution >> > >> >> >> or >> > >> >> >> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is >> >> >> prohibited >> > >> >> >> and >> > >> >> >> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail >> >> >> are >> > >> >> >> subject >> > >> >> >> to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client >> > >> >> >> engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in >> this >> > >> >> >> e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business >> >> >> of >> > >> >> >> the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> > >> >> >> error-free, >> > >> >> >> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> >> >> destroyed, >> > >> >> >> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative >> >> >> ("KPMG >> > >> >> >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing >> > >> >> >> services >> > >> >> >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a >> >> >> Swiss >> > >> >> >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of >> >> >> independent >> > >> >> >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> > >> >> >> services >> > >> >> >> to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> >> >> distinct >> > >> >> >> and >> > >> >> >> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> >> >> about >> >> >> the >> > >> >> >> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> >> >> obtained >> > >> >> >> from your KPMG representative. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept >> by >> > >> >> >> AntiVirus software. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ >> > >> >> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> > >> >> >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this >> > >> >> >> e-mail >> > >> >> >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this >> >> >> communication >> > >> >> >> in >> > >> >> >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," >> >> >> send >> > >> >> >> to >> > >> >> >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies >> >> >> of >> >> >> it. >> > >> >> >> If >> > >> >> >> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> >> >> distribution >> > >> >> >> or >> > >> >> >> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is >> >> >> prohibited >> > >> >> >> and >> > >> >> >> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail >> >> >> are >> > >> >> >> subject >> > >> >> >> to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client >> > >> >> >> engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in >> this >> > >> >> >> e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business >> >> >> of >> > >> >> >> the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> > >> >> >> error-free, >> > >> >> >> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> >> >> destroyed, >> > >> >> >> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative >> >> >> ("KPMG >> > >> >> >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing >> > >> >> >> services >> > >> >> >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a >> >> >> Swiss >> > >> >> >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of >> >> >> independent >> > >> >> >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> > >> >> >> services >> > >> >> >> to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> >> >> distinct >> > >> >> >> and >> > >> >> >> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> >> >> about >> >> >> the >> > >> >> >> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> >> >> obtained >> > >> >> >> from your KPMG representative. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept >> by >> > >> >> >> AntiVirus software. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> ********************************************************************** >> > >> >> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> > >> >> >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this >> > >> >> >> e-mail >> > >> >> >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this >> >> >> communication >> > >> >> >> in >> > >> >> >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," >> >> >> send >> > >> >> >> to >> > >> >> >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies >> >> >> of >> >> >> it. >> > >> >> >> If >> > >> >> >> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> >> >> distribution >> > >> >> >> or >> > >> >> >> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is >> >> >> prohibited >> > >> >> >> and >> > >> >> >> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail >> >> >> are >> > >> >> >> subject >> > >> >> >> to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client >> > >> >> >> engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in >> this >> > >> >> >> e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business >> >> >> of >> > >> >> >> the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> > >> >> >> error-free, >> > >> >> >> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> >> >> destroyed, >> > >> >> >> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative >> >> >> ("KPMG >> > >> >> >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing >> > >> >> >> services >> > >> >> >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a >> >> >> Swiss >> > >> >> >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of >> >> >> independent >> > >> >> >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> > >> >> >> services >> > >> >> >> to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> >> >> distinct >> > >> >> >> and >> > >> >> >> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> >> >> about >> >> >> the >> > >> >> >> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> >> >> obtained >> > >> >> >> from your KPMG representative. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept >> by >> > >> >> >> AntiVirus software. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> >> ========================================================================= >> > >> >> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing >> list. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this >> e-mail >> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received >> > this communication in error, please address with the subject heading >> > "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the >> > e-mail >> and >> > destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any >> > disclosure, copying, distribution or any >> > action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited >> > and >> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are >> subject >> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client >> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions >> > and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not >> relate >> > to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by >> it. >> > >> > >> > >> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, >> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> > destroyed, >> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing >> services >> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a >> > Swiss >> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity >> > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG >> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG >> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each >> describes >> > itself as such. Information about the >> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained >> > from your KPMG representative. >> > >> > >> > >> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> > AntiVirus software. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this >> e-mail >> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received >> > this communication in error, please address with the subject heading >> > "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the >> > e-mail >> and >> > destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any >> > disclosure, copying, distribution or any >> > action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited >> > and >> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are >> subject >> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client >> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions >> > and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not >> relate >> > to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by >> it. >> > >> > >> > >> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, >> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> > destroyed, >> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing >> services >> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a >> > Swiss >> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity >> > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG >> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG >> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each >> describes >> > itself as such. Information about the >> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained >> > from your KPMG representative. >> > >> > >> > >> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> > AntiVirus software. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this >> e-mail >> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received >> > this communication in error, please address with the subject heading >> > "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the >> > e-mail >> and >> > destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any >> > disclosure, copying, distribution or any >> > action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited >> > and >> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are >> subject >> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client >> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions >> > and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not >> relate >> > to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by >> it. >> > >> > >> > >> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, >> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> > destroyed, >> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing >> services >> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a >> > Swiss >> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity >> > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG >> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG >> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each >> describes >> > itself as such. Information about the >> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained >> > from your KPMG representative. >> > >> > >> > >> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> > AntiVirus software. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this >> e-mail >> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication >> in >> > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," >> > send >> to >> > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of >> it. If >> > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or >> > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is >> > prohibited >> and >> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are >> subject >> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client >> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this >> > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business >> > of >> > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> > >> > >> > >> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, >> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> > destroyed, >> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> > >> > >> > >> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing >> services >> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a >> > Swiss >> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of >> > independent >> > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services >> > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> > distinct >> and >> > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about >> > the >> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> > obtained >> > from your KPMG representative. >> > >> > >> > >> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> > AntiVirus software. >> > >> ========================================================================= >> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list. >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >> > ========================================================================= You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list. //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc