RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

  • From: Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:20:37 +0000

Seems like it could be 20 for download version.

I could live with that.

30 will be pushing it imo :(

From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:16:58 +0000









I understand that it’s not a full game. I’m sure USD30 is a real bargain for a 
5min speedrun game.
 
Maybe if you pre-order it you get a free picture of Kojima pulling the story 
out of his ass.
 


From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben

Sent: 05 February 2014 3:10 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi


 

Well wasnt going to be a "big" demo from the start?



Kinda like the ship segment from MGS2.   Cant remember it ever being advertised 
as a proper game.





Thats how I understood it from the start...




From:
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:04:32 +0000

Lol, 5min for a
speedrun. No doubt 4 of those 5 minutes are spend hiding.
 
Two hours of game, with 5minutes of actual gameplay. Yup, sounds like MGS…
Hopefully they will have a heavy pseudo-intellectual storyline to go along with 
it.

 
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ilitirit Sama

Sent: 05 February 2014 2:50 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
 

Disappointment of the week



http://metro.co.uk/2014/02/05/metal-gear-solid-v-ground-zeroes-is-only-2-hours-long-4291338/


 

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Wow, someone released the Art of Fighting source code (without assets, of 
course)



https://app.box.com/s/5on2e593tqt2c8ketc68




 

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Watched it live.  It will be on their YouTube channel in the next day or so.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9yHaajDKNc




 

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Sean Carrington <theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:



Link -_-





 

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Did anyone watch Infiltration vs Tokido?  Highest level of Akuma play I've 
seen.  SFIV is relatively slow but it's so demanding on fast reactions and 
situational awareness.  In one situation
 Tokido did a combo into reset and which he knew would trade if Infiltration 
did a DP.  He did this because he was calculating the stun values in his head.  
Infiltration went for the DP, it traded and Tokido got the dizzy.  So pro.





 

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair 
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Sounds like he was having a pretty horrible nightmare.
 
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ilitirit Sama

Sent: 05 February 2014 1:11 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi




 

Go back to sleep.


 

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Sean Carrington <theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:



Did someone say SFxT ?





 

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Gamernet House, 45 Salisbury Road, Cape Town, ZA




 

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Jack Steel <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Let me know were as it is my 1st time




On 2/5/14, Jack Steel <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Reason y i have xbox and ps3 was 4 kof 13 but i did not get copy i had

> sfxt found 1 sa player further no1.that's y i was gears of war player

> now im stuck on ggpo 4 competition toying around.

>

> On 2/5/14, Jack Steel <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Im gonna start of slow c im new 2 group im sa and friendly .i had a

>> copy of kof 12 but i need a copy of kof 13 i got xbox and ps3 and will

>> soon upgrade graphic card 4 pc. To cover most platforms c what games r

>> famous 2 play.train.and thn c  it sound interesting.ill try 2 come 2

>> belville 2 get use 2 the flow.

>>

>> On 2/5/14, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>> I remember playing you on GGPO.  My user name is ilitirit but I don't

>>> play

>>> on there any more cos my GGPO doesn't work.  We play on SupArc now.

>>> It's

>>> like GGPO but you can play against 3 people in a lobby if you want to.

>>>

>>> Are you going to come to the Saturday sessions in Bellville?

>>>

>>>

>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Jack Steel <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>>

>>>> My ggpo user is goku1up- and finalfighter i smashed many ggpo kof 2002

>>>> players avk team sa and other locals they tried all cheats 2 no profit

>>>> i hope to get smashed in kof13 and other platforms.smash or b

>>>> smashed"d.^_^;)

>>>>

>>>> On 2/3/14, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>>> > I wonder if they would have done the same if it was me?

>>>> >

>>>> > Or would they be all like... call the hospital, this man is about to

>>>> have a

>>>> > heart-attack.

>>>> >

>>>> >

>>>> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Sean Carrington

>>>> > <theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx

>>>> >> wrote:

>>>> >

>>>> >> I think I'm troubled.

>>>> >>

>>>> >> I might have cursed one too many times at the GM of Telkom

>>>> >> Claremont.

>>>> >> I was escorted out of the mall by security... *facepalm*.

>>>> >> On 03 Feb 2014 4:02 PM, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>>> >>

>>>> >>> "subjective prices" - I mean that they are priced subjectively...

>>>> >>> See

>>>> >>> DeBont and Thaler (1985)'s classic overreaction hypothesis, or

>>>> >>> google

>>>> >>> anything on herding, as a basic yet 'oh so' applicable example.

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>>> Never heard of Peter Stone. Can you send me the title of the

>>>> >>>> article

>>>> or

>>>> >>>> the pdf? I'd love to read it.

>>>> >>>>

>>>> >>>> The reason why its frequently mentioned/used within the Hedge Fund

>>>> >>>> industry is due to how rapidly HFs change, as can be seen in the

>>>> >>>> quant

>>>> >>>> meltdown of 2007 (In three days, you could've made R1 turn into

>>>> >>>> R500,

>>>> >>>> if

>>>> >>>> you were at the right place at the right time). Testing for

>>>> >>>> adaption

>>>> >>>> here

>>>> >>>> is extremely interesting, and saves you years of work. HFs is also

>>>> >>>> the

>>>> >>>> canary in the coal mine in world of finance.

>>>> >>>>

>>>> >>>> You are spot on with the over-fitting issue. :-) I corrected this

>>>> >>>> when

>>>> >>>> I

>>>> >>>> implemented mine. When using fundamental analysis, they'd

>>>> >>>> implement

>>>> >>>> like,

>>>> >>>> 15 different fundamental metrics, of which maybe 4 or 5 have any

>>>> >>>> statical

>>>> >>>> significance. In fact, certain researchers went to the extent of

>>>> running

>>>> >>>> a

>>>> >>>> GA to select the variables for "best-fit" first... which is akin

>>>> >>>> to

>>>> >>>> data-mining in the sense that they are finding the best variables

>>>> >>>> that

>>>> >>>> fit

>>>> >>>> with the given data BEFORE running the algorithm.

>>>> >>>>

>>>> >>>> And yes, the evolutionary algorithm is trained using a data-base

>>>> first,

>>>> >>>> before it goes live. Typically, the GA selects the variables and

>>>> >>>> the

>>>> ANN

>>>> >>>> is

>>>> >>>> what does all the decision making. Having the computer decide what

>>>> >>>> it

>>>> >>>> should do for both is unwise, or at least, I think so.

>>>> >>>>

>>>> >>>> Like I said, you put garbage in, you going to get garbage out,

>>>> >>>> that

>>>> >>>> is

>>>> >>>> how it works with these black box machines, so yeah, people have

>>>> >>>> used

>>>> >>>> GA's

>>>> >>>> before, but like we both mentioned, how you program it and I would

>>>> >>>> is

>>>> >>>> totally different, which means it would learn differently, just as

>>>> >>>> we

>>>> >>>> do.

>>>> >>>>

>>>> >>>> You also mentioned "Buy-Low/Sell-High" when there are economic

>>>> >>>> shocks,

>>>> >>>> which is a great strategy, sure, but stock prices will adjust

>>>> >>>> accordingly

>>>> >>>> anyway, so while they may be cheaper than usual, they won't

>>>> necessarily

>>>> >>>> be

>>>> >>>> mispriced, which is what I'm interested in. I can't always wait

>>>> >>>> for

>>>> >>>> some

>>>> >>>> kind of external economic movement to make money.

>>>> >>>>

>>>> >>>>   As you've said, I don't want to match the market at all, else

>>>> >>>> I'd

>>>> >>>> go

>>>> >>>> passive. Stocks are priced at the value that the market values it

>>>> >>>> at

>>>> >>>> and

>>>> >>>> those are often subjective prices, more often than not.If I had a

>>>> basic

>>>> >>>> program to initiate buy/sell commands based on whether a stock

>>>> >>>> falls

>>>> >>>> below/above a certain price and expect it to earn money, I'd be a

>>>> >>>> billionaire by now.

>>>> >>>>

>>>> >>>>

>>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Ilitirit Sama

>>>> >>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

>>>> >>>>

>>>> >>>>> @GB

>>>> >>>>>

>>>> >>>>> I did some reading up on using GA against the stock market.  It

>>>> >>>>> seems

>>>> >>>>> some Hedge Funds use them already, but most of these funds are

>>>> already

>>>> >>>>> defunct (probably not because of the use of GAs though).  Was

>>>> >>>>> that

>>>> >>>>> paper

>>>> >>>>> you mentioned by Peter Stone?  It answers a lot of the questions

>>>> >>>>> I

>>>> had.

>>>> >>>>>  It

>>>> >>>>> seems the evolution of the ANN happens way before the data is run

>>>> >>>>> on

>>>> >>>>> live

>>>> >>>>> data.  Stock Market GAs also tend to suffer from "over-fitting",

>>>> which

>>>> >>>>> is

>>>> >>>>> something I also mentioned.  They try to adjust to past

>>>> >>>>> performance

>>>> in

>>>> >>>>> order to generate an expected result.  However, most GAs don't

>>>> >>>>> take

>>>> >>>>> into

>>>> >>>>> account random fluctuations in the result, so they fail miserably

>>>> when

>>>> >>>>> they

>>>> >>>>> try to derive patterns from the data.  The best they can do is to

>>>> >>>>> try

>>>> >>>>> to

>>>> >>>>> match the curve, which of course is very bad.

>>>> >>>>>

>>>> >>>>>

>>>> >>>>>

>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ilitirit Sama

>>>> >>>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

>>>> >>>>>

>>>> >>>>>> He needs to confirm the subscription.  The link should be at the

>>>> >>>>>> bottom of any of the admins' messages.  Give me his email

>>>> >>>>>> address.

>>>> >>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, lindsey kiviets

>>>> >>>>>> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx

>>>> >>>>>> > wrote:

>>>> >>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>> lol,

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>> @ilitrit , gimme th fgc link again please.i added Hilton myself

>>>> >>>>>>> ,

>>>> >>>>>>> and

>>>> >>>>>>> it seems he is not added to the mails.

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------

>>>> >>>>>>> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 13:59:14 +0200

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

>>>> >>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx

>>>> >>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>> *lol* Guys will just have to put their cellphones where I can

>>>> >>>>>>> see

>>>> >>>>>>> em,

>>>> >>>>>>> or else :P Scumbaggery at it's finest :P

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>> I'm busy editing the vids. Will start uploading soon :)

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Ashraf Barendse <

>>>> >>>>>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>> The first rule of Random FG club is...

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>> Gohan is a charge character. I know this because LB knows this.

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> =========================================================================

>>>> >>>>>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community

>>>> >>>>>>> mailing

>>>> >>>>>>> list.

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>>

>>>> >>>>>

>>>> >>>>

>>>> >>>

>>>> >

>>>> =========================================================================

>>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing

>>>> list.

>>>>

>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc

>>>>

>>>

>>

>

=========================================================================

You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.



//www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc




 





 





 








The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received
 this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received 
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any
 action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may 
be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the 
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. 
Opinions, conclusions
 and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to 
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.




This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.




 





 





 





 





 





The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received
 this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received 
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any
 action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may 
be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the 
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. 
Opinions, conclusions
 and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to 
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.




This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.




The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please 
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original 
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the 
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken 
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do 
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed 
by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. 



This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms 
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to 
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and 
separate entity and each describes itself as such.  Information about the 
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.
                                          

Other related posts: