*LOL* On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 5:47 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Oh really? Well, that is fantastic for him. > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Af2rvOlj9UU&list=TLdtb2v_jT08cWTtKOtqvXos4PlUSqetF7 > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> Ragna commented on one of the DBZ HD tourney vids, saying he could easily >> have won the tournament as he used to play the game regularly *lol* >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >>> http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~pstone/Papers/bib2html/b2hd-GECCO06-trading.html >>> >>> Forgot to mention this interesting bit of research: >>> http://www.nature.com/srep/2013/130425/srep01684/full/srep01684.html >>> >>> tl;dr: The higher the number of searches for specific financial terms >>> via Google Trends, the greater the prediction of a stock market crash. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Never heard of Peter Stone. Can you send me the title of the article or >>>> the pdf? I'd love to read it. >>>> >>>> The reason why its frequently mentioned/used within the Hedge Fund >>>> industry is due to how rapidly HFs change, as can be seen in the quant >>>> meltdown of 2007 (In three days, you could've made R1 turn into R500, if >>>> you were at the right place at the right time). Testing for adaption here >>>> is extremely interesting, and saves you years of work. HFs is also the >>>> canary in the coal mine in world of finance. >>>> >>>> You are spot on with the over-fitting issue. :-) I corrected this when >>>> I implemented mine. When using fundamental analysis, they'd implement like, >>>> 15 different fundamental metrics, of which maybe 4 or 5 have any statical >>>> significance. In fact, certain researchers went to the extent of running a >>>> GA to select the variables for "best-fit" first... which is akin to >>>> data-mining in the sense that they are finding the best variables that fit >>>> with the given data BEFORE running the algorithm. >>>> >>>> And yes, the evolutionary algorithm is trained using a data-base first, >>>> before it goes live. Typically, the GA selects the variables and the ANN is >>>> what does all the decision making. Having the computer decide what it >>>> should do for both is unwise, or at least, I think so. >>>> >>>> Like I said, you put garbage in, you going to get garbage out, that is >>>> how it works with these black box machines, so yeah, people have used GA's >>>> before, but like we both mentioned, how you program it and I would is >>>> totally different, which means it would learn differently, just as we do. >>>> >>>> You also mentioned "Buy-Low/Sell-High" when there are economic shocks, >>>> which is a great strategy, sure, but stock prices will adjust accordingly >>>> anyway, so while they may be cheaper than usual, they won't necessarily be >>>> mispriced, which is what I'm interested in. I can't always wait for some >>>> kind of external economic movement to make money. >>>> >>>> As you've said, I don't want to match the market at all, else I'd go >>>> passive. Stocks are priced at the value that the market values it at and >>>> those are often subjective prices, more often than not.If I had a basic >>>> program to initiate buy/sell commands based on whether a stock falls >>>> below/above a certain price and expect it to earn money, I'd be a >>>> billionaire by now. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: >>>> >>>>> @GB >>>>> >>>>> I did some reading up on using GA against the stock market. It seems >>>>> some Hedge Funds use them already, but most of these funds are already >>>>> defunct (probably not because of the use of GAs though). Was that paper >>>>> you mentioned by Peter Stone? It answers a lot of the questions I had. >>>>> It >>>>> seems the evolution of the ANN happens way before the data is run on live >>>>> data. Stock Market GAs also tend to suffer from "over-fitting", which is >>>>> something I also mentioned. They try to adjust to past performance in >>>>> order to generate an expected result. However, most GAs don't take into >>>>> account random fluctuations in the result, so they fail miserably when >>>>> they >>>>> try to derive patterns from the data. The best they can do is to try to >>>>> match the curve, which of course is very bad. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> He needs to confirm the subscription. The link should be at the >>>>>> bottom of any of the admins' messages. Give me his email address. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, lindsey kiviets < >>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> lol, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> @ilitrit , gimme th fgc link again please.i added Hilton myself , >>>>>>> and it seems he is not added to the mails. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 13:59:14 +0200 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *lol* Guys will just have to put their cellphones where I can see >>>>>>> em, or else :P Scumbaggery at it's finest :P >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm busy editing the vids. Will start uploading soon :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Ashraf Barendse < >>>>>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The first rule of Random FG club is... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gohan is a charge character. I know this because LB knows this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ========================================================================= >>>>>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing >>>>>>> list. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >