Hm, I see what you mean! It's not that important; I'd consider a beautiful icon more important than a square one. The "long" form is still fine as things stand on Twitter, and it leaves room for carefully uncluttered text below it, which is good for stickers or letterhead. On 04/07/14 16:18, jean o neill wrote: > So, if you put the tree looping back over the text, it actually looks way > too crowded. I've gotten an alternative version below though with different > font again, just to give options, and a smaller tree. This is actually on a > curved vector it seems so it should sit better in round things. I'll see if > they can do a more curved curved one later in the weekend, though it may > mean losing foliage. > > > On 4 July 2014 00:01, jean o neill <jean.oneill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I shall see what can be done :) >> >> >> >> On 3 July 2014 22:11, Cathal Garvey <cathalgarvey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Possibly big request, but one which I think is relevant: >>> Right now, it's rectangular in shape, which isn't ideal. I wonder how >>> hard it would be to re-work the tree so it curves back over the lettering? >>> >>> Also, I didn't think I'd like the obvious receding strand, but actually >>> I do. And, at least one person showed the prior version didn't "get" the >>> one with the missing receding helix, so explicit is better. >>> >>> On 02/07/14 13:06, corkbiomakerspace-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>> I'm now thinking of a horrible amount of jokes involving 'dropping the >>>> hand', which is inappropiate in a family and work environment :D >>>> here's one with two obvious strands... personally I'm not as keen, but >>> sure >>>> what d'ya think? >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> T: @onetruecathal, @IndieBBDNA >>> P: +353876363185 >>> W: http://indiebiotech.com >>> >> >> > -- T: @onetruecathal, @IndieBBDNA P: +353876363185 W: http://indiebiotech.com
Attachment:
0x988B9099.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
