I thought it was already in there. At least, it's there enough to give
errors when there's something missing in the froent. For example, I just
finished fixing some issues it brought up with the changes I've made for an
enhancement to let users see the contents of a comic file's archive.
I'm not a SonarCloud expert so am not sure what we can do to make the
testing better. But I'm open to whatever can be done to achieve better,
more reliable feedback from it.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 11:53 AM Frédéric Fouret <fouretfrederic@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Today I went to look at the sonarcloud of the project. We're seeing weak
code coverage and quality gate failed.... It's a pity because there is a
lot of testing done on the frontend that is not taken into account.
Can we add frontend code coverage to sonarcloud ?
