Am 22/10/2015 um 15:18 schrieb Mitchell Joblin:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Wolfgang Mauerer
<wolfgang.mauerer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 22/10/2015 um 14:55 schrieb Mitchell Joblin:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Wolfgang Mauerer
<wolfgang.mauerer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 22/10/2015 um 14:11 schrieb Mitchell Joblin:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Wolfgang Mauerer
<wolfgang.mauerer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[trimmed CC list since this does not concern DB design any more]
Am 22/10/2015 um 13:51 schrieb Mitchell Joblin:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Mitchell Joblin <joblin.m@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Wolfgang Mauerer
<wm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
do you get reasonable scatterplots from the initiate-response plug
in?
This warning simply says that for a given thread, there are no
responses. We should maybe get rid of this message completely.
I don't think that's right. I think this statement is executed when
all threads have no responses. The condition for executing the
statement is "is.null(dat.replies)" and dat.replies contains all
replies for all email threads, not just a single one.
you're right, I should have looked closer. Still, does the scatter
plot
contain any useful information? For qemu, for instance, I get
reasonable
results. Which list are you working with?
I forgot to add that I checked for scatter plots in the web frontend
and nothing is available there.
A was referring to plots like the following:
p
http://im-vm-010.hs-regensburg.de:8081/apps/details/?projectid=85&widget=widget.ir.details.receiving,widget.ir.details.writing&topic=communication
Yes, this is the widget I checked.
okay. I was not sure if you're referring to the widget or the content
when you said nothing was there.
Since the only difference between our setup seems to using a
release-base versus a sliding window-based analsis, could you
run your analysis with explicit releases?
I just downloaded the last 1000 emails from qemu devel list. I then
used gen.corpus to generate the corpus and the thread depth on all
messages is only one. I can't believe that is possible for 1000
messages. Maybe there is a version discrepancy between our systems.
Here is my output for "sessionInfo()"
other attached packages:
[1] snatm_1.2 igraph_0.7.1 wordnet_0.1-10 sna_2.3-2
[5] tm.plugin.mail_0.1 tm_0.6-2 NLP_0.1-7
can you try with a fresh vagrant installation? This way, we have a
well-defined common base. In particular, did you include this
https://github.com/wolfgangmauerer/tm-plugin-mail/commit/31e9ca1dc50087314c24ece95f2264f81caf9ff8
This was what I needed. I didn't know that the tm-plugin-mail package
was broken.
If we intend to proceed this way then I suggest that we completely
rewrite the installation procedure to use only vagrant because using
the current installation procedure just leads to broken analyses. I
don't even think vagrant is mentioned as an option for installation.
