[CEVNA]: Re: 1943 lamination? help.
- From: "Kerry Pinette" <kepinette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <cndcoinerrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 19:40:02 -0400
I'm with Denis on this one. Very nice lamination peel that has travelled to the
"4" to partially cover the didget. Herbert indicates common causes are gas or
improper alloy mix. Obviously bigger is better and condition is important for
viewing. I recenly found an 1859 large cent with lamination flaws on both the
obverse and reverse. Although not as dramatic as this coin, it was interesting
to note part of the reverse rim had broken away to partially cover one of the
leaves. ----- Original Message -----
From: Fenix
To: cndcoinerrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:48 PM
Subject: [CEVNA]: 1943 lamination? help.
Hi Everyone
I am including images of a 1943 5c with what I believe to be a lamination
error. What I need help with is how. I believe it is authentic and I initially
thought I knew what I was looking at, but after thinking about it a little
while I may have centipede'd my self. I would explain further but I don't want
to influence the responses.
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
Henry
Other related posts:
