[cldp] Re: libraries wrapping incompatible interfaces
- From: "Benjamin Rich" <benjamin.rich@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cldp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:49:28 +1000
You have my full endorsement to install a wiki for the site.
-Ben
On 4/18/06, Michael Pearce <mdpearce@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, but a wiki makes things a lot easier to update, particularly when more
> people start becoming involved in the project
>
> -Michael
>
>
> On 4/18/06, Benjamin Rich <benjamin.rich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Michael,
> >
> > But I mean the site is supposed to be the wiki, as it were. All the
> > info on how everything works will be at the site. But anyway we can
> > set up a wiki, I just don't want to do it at the moment, I'm sick and
> > I'm completely without wiki-setting-up skills.
> >
> > -Ben
> >
> > On 4/18/06, Michael Pearce <mdpearce@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/18/06, Benjamin Rich < benjamin.rich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As for a public wiki, I've never set one up before. I dabbled with the
> > > > mediawiki software (base for wikipedia etc.) but it seemed large and
> > > > complex and frightening. I don't know if public contribution is what
> > > > we want so much as a good site to succinctly present the CLDP. But as
> > > > far as user-interaction, I was thinking maybe an interactive FAQ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Wiki is the way to go IMO. It's not a difficult prospect to set up, and
> it
> > > doesn't have to be publicly writeable if you don't want.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Michael Pearce
> > > <mdpearce@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Michael Pearce
> <mdpearce@xxxxxxxxx>
Other related posts:
