[cldp] Re: libraries wrapping incompatible interfaces

  • From: "Michael Pearce" <mdpearce@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cldp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:45:00 +1000

Yes, but a wiki makes things a lot easier to update, particularly when more
people start becoming involved in the project

-Michael

On 4/18/06, Benjamin Rich <benjamin.rich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> But I mean the site is supposed to be the wiki, as it were. All the
> info on how everything works will be at the site. But anyway we can
> set up a wiki, I just don't want to do it at the moment, I'm sick and
> I'm completely without wiki-setting-up skills.
>
> -Ben
>
> On 4/18/06, Michael Pearce <mdpearce@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/18/06, Benjamin Rich <benjamin.rich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > As for a public wiki, I've never set one up before. I dabbled with the
> > > mediawiki software (base for wikipedia etc.) but it seemed large and
> > > complex and frightening. I don't know if public contribution is what
> > > we want so much as a good site to succinctly present the CLDP. But as
> > > far as user-interaction, I was thinking maybe an interactive FAQ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Wiki is the way to go IMO. It's not a difficult prospect to set up, and
> it
> > doesn't have to be publicly writeable if you don't want.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Michael Pearce
> > <mdpearce@xxxxxxxxx>
>



--
Michael Pearce
<mdpearce@xxxxxxxxx>

Other related posts: