http://fcs.tamu.edu/safety/passenger_safety/tech_update/april2012.php Copied below is a tech update from Texas, the link is above. It has some very helpful information including information about recertification. Please remember to sign up for CEU update classes as they become available in your area! Home > Safety > Passenger Safety > For Certified Technicians > Tech Update > April 2012Tech Update – April 2012 Inflatable Booster Seats: Thinking Outside the BoxCPS technicians have first-hand experience in working with families to meet their travel needs. When it comes to belt-positioning boosters, they must do one thing only—position the child so the lap and shoulder belt fits correctly. They do not function in the same way as a harnessed restraint because the vehicle seat belt bears the burden of protection—not the booster itself. We all know people buy booster seats for several reasons: easy to use, portable for travel or car pooling, inexpensive, fits their child, fits their vehicle, and child likes using the booster.Conventional boosters provide a choice of backless and high-back design. Each serves a different purpose. I recently saw an inflatable booster seat that was passed around a group of technicians, and the comments varied from “Is it FMVSS 213 approved?” to “I don’t think I would have my child ride in it.” Innovation is a way of life. We need to keep an open mind and learn about new products by asking questions and understanding why it may appeal to parents and caregivers. Check out the websites for two innovative products that are currently FMVSS 213 approved, the BubbleBum (backless) and Go Booster (high back). As techs, we understand what it means when a product is FMVSS 213 approved. The manufacturer self-certifies that the car seat meets the requirements of the FMVSS through extensive testing. We should be concerned with the fit of the lap and of the shoulder portion of the seat belt. We should also ask, “Is this an option for 3 in a row on the back seat?” Aren’t these questions asked of any booster seat fit? Additionally, we might ask a manufacturer for test results after learning more about their product by visiting the websites and viewing any video clips. Although the data may be proprietary and not completely available, some techs may find it interesting—and it never hurts to ask for information! There are opportunities to review blog posts and other social media as well as reviewing the comparison of boosters through consumer testing with other boosters. You can read more at: http://www.iihs.org/research/topics/boosters/.ATVs: Dangerous for KidsAs safety advocates, we have long known of the dangers to kids who ride all-terrain vehicles (ATVs). A recent study published by Neurosurg Focus proved that size is more important than skill or experience when it comes to young riders. Children are four to twelve times more likely to be injured riding an ATV than adult riders.The major injury risks with riding ATVs are: head injuries (cause of most ATV-related deaths); head and spinal trauma; abdominal injuries; abrasions, lacerations, and clavicle and extremity fractures; and burn injuries from contact with the engine and exhaust system. The authors concluded that “individuals with light weights and small wingspans, such as those in the pediatric population, are under considerable risk of injury when operating an ATV due to lateral, longitudinal, and vertical operational instability.”For more information: Safe Kids USA ATV Policy Statement Children’s Safety Network Off-Road Vehicles Injury Topic US Consumer Product Safety Commission ATV StatementCHOP Unveils New CPS WebsiteLast month, the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) announced the launch of its new CPS website, Car Seat Safety for Kids, replacing the popular Keeping Kids Safe during Crashes site. The website domain remains the same at www.chop.edu/carseat.The site brings together the expertise of CHOP and the best CPS resources available as a “one stop shop” for parents. CPS technicians will find that the popular “Car Seat Safety by Age” videos have been updated based on the latest recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics. DVDs of the videos will be available in English and Spanish later this year. The site also features new content such as a section for expectant parents, one for parents of premature babies or babies with special medical conditions, and detailed information and links to find car seat checks nationwide. Parents, educators, and CPS technicians can also utilize the “Educational Resources” section containing free illustrations, images, reports, fact sheets, and podcasts that are available for download.A joint effort of the Center for Injury Research and Prevention and the Kohl’s Injury Prevention Program at CHOP, Car Seat Safety for Kids was made possible with the generous support of Global Automakers and Kohl’s. Please visit, link to, and share www.chop.edu/carseat with your colleagues and the parents with whom you work.2011 Scientific Articles: A Year in ReviewIn case you missed these articles from 2011, here are some highlights. This list is not comprehensive. A list of example articles appropriate for CEUs (3 for 1 CEU.1 CEU maximum) may be found at http://cert.safekids.org/ResourcesFAQs/Forms/Recertification.aspx. Click on the link, “Examples of Scientific Articles.” American Academy of Pediatrics Technical Report: Child Passenger Safety Pediatrics. Vol. 127 No. 4 April 1, 2011, pp. e1050 -e1066. Available online: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/127/4/e1050.full. American Academy of Pediatrics Policy Statement: Child Passenger Safety Pediatrics. Vol. 127 No. 4 April 2011, pp. 788-793. Available online: http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/pediatrics;127/4/788. Grandparents Driving Grandchildren: An Evaluation of Child Passenger Safety and Injuries. Pediatrics. Vol. 128 No. 2 August 1, 2011. Available online: http://www.pediatricsdigest.mobi/content/128/2/289.full. Emergency Physicians’ Knowledge and Provision of Child Passenger Safety Information. Academic Emergency Medicine. Volume 18, Issue 2, pages 145–151, February 2011. Available online (abstract only): http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00971.x/abstract. NHTSA Unveils New “10-Year-Old Child” Crash Test DummyTest dummy will evaluate growing number of child seats and boosters designed for children weighing more than 65 poundsThe nation’s automotive safety agency unveiled a new crash test dummy that will be used to evaluate the growing number of child safety seats and boosters made for children weighing more than 65 pounds. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA’s) “10-year-old child” dummy is the latest addition to the agency’s family of test dummies and is the best tool currently available for measuring the risk of injury to a child using a higher-weight child restraint system in the event of a vehicle crash.“It’s good news that manufacturers are making more car seats and boosters than ever before designed to keep older and heavier children safer on our roadways,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood “As the marketplace evolves to accommodate changing consumer needs, it’s important that safety regulators also have the best tools possible for evaluating how well these products work. The new test dummy breaks new ground for the Department’s crash test program and is a significant step forward for evaluating child seat performance.”The 10-year-old child test dummy was developed in concert with new safety seat requirements updated to keep pace with the latest scientific research and child restraint system technologies. It will provide never-before-available information capturing the risk of injuries using head and knee excursions, as well as chest acceleration. The final rule issued by NHTSA last month amends the current federal child safety seat standard to include car seats and boosters specified for children weighing more than 65 pounds and up to 80 pounds. The expanded standard will evaluate how well the higher-weight restraint systems manage crash energy and if the seat’s structure stays intact by incorporating the use of the dummy for the first time ever in compliance tests. Manufacturers will have two years to certify their higher-weight car seats and boosters to meet the new requirements.“Our new dummy is an excellent addition to NHTSA’s extensive child seat compliance testing program and will enable the agency to gather the best data yet on the performance of higher-weight child seats,” said David Strickland, NHTSA Administrator. “Even as we begin to reap the benefits of this new tool, NHTSA is already looking down the road and has research under way to further improve the dummy.”The announcement follows more stringent child safety seat recommendations issued by NHTSA last year encouraging parents and caregivers to keep children in a car seat with a harness for as long as possible, up to the height and weight specifications of the seat. The agency’s updated child seat guidance also recommends that children ride in a booster seat until they are big enough to fit in a seat belt properly, which is typically when the child is somewhere between 8–12 years old and about 4 feet 9 inches tall.LATCH Usability StudyInstalling child restraints can frustrate even the most capable of parents. A system called Lower Anchors and Tethers for Children is supposed to make things easier by standardizing attachment hardware, but a new study shows that many automakers aren’t paying attention to the key factors that make LATCH work. Only 21 of the 98 top-selling 2010–11 model passenger vehicles evaluated have LATCH designs that are easy to use. This is the main finding of joint research conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI). UMTRI researchers reviewed LATCH hardware and rear seats in cars, minivans, pickups, station wagons, and SUVs. To measure and assess how child restraints fit in each vehicle, they used a test fixture and other tools in line with 2009 draft guidelines developed by a Society of Automotive Engineers working group. They then picked 12 vehicles representing a range of LATCH setups and asked 36 volunteers to each install three different types of child restraints in three of the vehicles.Researchers identified three factors associated with correct lower anchor use: depth, clearance, and force.Depth. Lower anchors should be located no more than 3/4 inch deep in the seat bight and should be easy to see. Clearance. Nothing should obstruct access to the anchors. Safety belt buckles and other hardware plus the foam, cloth or leather material of the seats themselves shouldn’t get in the way of attaching child seat connectors. There should be enough room around the anchors to approach them at an angle, as well as straight-on. This makes it easier to hook or snap on connectors and also tighten LATCH straps. In the study, a clearance angle of at least 54 degrees was associated with easier installation. Force. Parents should be able to install child restraints using less than 40 pounds of force. Some systems require lots of effort to properly attach child seat hardware with lower anchors, in part because they are deep in the seat bight or surrounded by interfering parts of the vehicle seat.All three factors are related and are good predictors of how well people are able to correctly install child restraints. Vehicles meeting the criteria were 19 times as likely to have lower anchors used correctly by the volunteers compared with vehicles that don’t meet any of the criteria.One common problem researchers encountered in the lab is that safety belt buckles, plastic housing, or vehicle seats obscure or interfere with lower anchors. Another issue is that the anchors are sometimes buried deep within the back seats, so parents might have to dig around in the cushions to find them. Lower anchors were visible in just 36 of the 98 study vehicles. Researchers considered the anchors visible if they were easy to see or could be seen by removing a prominently marked cover.Federal rules dictate the minimum number of seating positions that must have LATCH, the size of the lower anchors, and how far apart they can be situated. If the lower anchors aren’t visible, markers on the seats must indicate their location. Other design details are left up to automakers. For instance, the regulations don’t specify anchor depth within the seat bight or limit how hard someone has to push on a child restraint to connect LATCH. Researchers found that these factors affect the likelihood that people will install child restraints correctly.Another finding is that only seven of the 98 vehicles surveyed have dedicated LATCH anchors in the center, second-row seats, even though that is the safest place for children to travel. Nine vehicles allow borrowing of anchors from the outboard seats, and 82 have no center anchors at all. In the 21 minivans and SUVs with third rows, 11 have no lower anchors at all in these seats.Volunteer installations. In the study, parents correctly used the lower anchors 60 percent of the time. Volunteers who correctly used anchors were more than three times as likely to get a tight fit as volunteers who didn’t use them the right way. When anchors were misused, common mistakes included not orienting the connectors properly, attaching them to the wrong hardware, and not snapping them in all the way. Twisted straps also counted as an error.Certified child passenger safety technicians evaluated the installations. They deemed them tight if the restraint didn’t move more than an inch sideways or back and forth when pulled. All of the participants currently used child seats in their own vehicles. If they had questions about how to install the seats in the study, they could consult owners’ manuals but received no other assistance.Tethers aren’t optional. Volunteers used top tethers just 48 percent of the time with forward-facing child restraints. When tethers were used, 54 percent of the installations were incorrect. Leaving too much slack in the strap was a common error. Another was attaching tethers to the wrong hardware.Overall, parents and caregivers correctly installed seats with lower anchors and top tethers to get a tight, secure fit at the right angle in just 13 percent of the cases.“With tethers, the main issue is use, not usability,” says Kathy Klinich, assistant research scientist at UMTRI and the study’s lead author. “Many parents don’t realize they are supposed to use the tether.”Previous studies have shown that many people neglect to use tethers. A 2010 Institute survey found tethers in use 43 percent of the time, about the same as in the mid-1970s.“Tethers should be used with all forward-facing child restraints, even if parents opt to secure seats with safety belts instead of lower anchors,” Klinich says. “We need to better educate people about tether use.”Making LATCH easier to use might encourage more parents to use child restraints and install them correctly, McCartt says. In 2010, 29 percent of children 1–3 years old and 12 percent of infants younger than 1 who died in crashes were riding unrestrained. Those numbers mark a sharp improvement over 1985, when 71 percent of children ages 1–3 and 35 percent of infants killed in crashes were unrestrained.On-line CEU Opportunity Provided by: The Texas AgriLife Extension Service Passenger Safety Project The Texas AgriLife Extension Service Passenger Safety Project is offering three on-line tech update courses that will provide 2 CEUs each. It is the on-line version of the Tech Update Workshop offered by Passenger Safety on February 2, 2011, in Bryan and across the state via video conferencing. The course, titled Tech Update 2011, Parts 1–3, is available at: http://extensiononline.tamu.edu/courses/volunteers.php. Note that the maximum CEUs allowed in the on-line education category is five.Other On-line CEU OpportunitiesProvided by: Safe Kids Worldwide and NHTSA Location: http://www.safekidswebinars.org/ Currently available: Vehicle Safety Part 1: Federal Regulations, Vehicle Safety Part 2: Consumer Testing, School Buses, A Tech’ s Guide to Recalls, and Transporting Children in Vehicles Other Than Cars. Technicians will register, log in, finish the webinar, and print a certificate of completion. This webinar requires participants to gather information from other sites (links provided) to have a quality learning experience. Again, note that the maximum CEUs allowed in the on-line education category is five. Re-Certification Reminder You may re-certify up to four months before your certification expiration date. Avoid problems – don’t delay! Basic re-certification requirements and deadlines: Five seat checks approved by a certified instructor (you may use the technician proxy option). You can do the checks at any time during your certification cycle as long as they are entered on-line and a certified instructor approves them before your re-certification date. Community education (choose one): Participation in at least one two-hour checkup event with at least one other CPS technician using any standardized checklist to provide documentation, if needed. Provide at least four hours of community education. Examples include making presentations to parents, educators, kids, organizations (such as PTAs or law enforcement), or other stakeholders who are not technicians. A minimum of six hours of CPS technical continuing education units earned and reported during a current two-year certification cycle. You cannot carry over CEUs from one period to the next, even if you have accumulated more CEUs than are required. You can record CEUs any time during your certification cycle, but they must fit into one of the five approved categories and meet content requirements.Register and pay the re-certification fee before your certification expiration date. To get to the payment screen, you must have: Completed all five seat checks (entered and CPSTI approved). Entered at least six CEUs. Entered your community event information. Once all three are done, you will see a “Click Here to Continue” button that will take you to the payment screens. Once your registration is complete, your re-certification will be processed in two to four days.Remember to Update Your On-line Profile at the Safe Kids WebsiteSafe Kids Certification Website – http://cert.safekids.org Techs can log in to update their profile and enter re-certification information. Please remember to change your bookmark to reflect this new address.Sources: CPS Express October–December 2011 Last updated: 4 May, 2012Educational programs of the Texas AgriLife Extension Service are open to all people without regard to race, color, sex, disability, religion, age, or national origin. Camie Wewer-Program Coordinator *CPS Technician/Instructor*Special Needs CPSNourish @ North Suburban Medical Center * Baby On The Go * Child Passenger Safety Assistance and Education303 489 4819 Cell 303 453 2273 NSMC