> -----Original Message----- > From: Dimitri Schoolwerth > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 16:54 > > On 6/18/14, 0:01, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > > I would prefer it to be a submodule. But I would not care if it was not. > > <snip/> > > 2. It would be at the user's discresion to slup down those bytes. > > It's ~12 MB for a repo with only 7.1a and ~52 MB for a repo > with history > of all TC releases. That's excluding any compression done > during transport. I woulde be fine with an ISO in the repo, but is everyone else happy with it? <snip/> > To clarify: the repo does not contain something like a > directory per TC > release. Instead there's a commit (and tag) per TC release (with a > commit date the same as the date of TC release). Interesting, I was thinking it was going to be more overt than a tag. Would the point to be overt in showing attention to the archive versions? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.