Could anyone please enlighten me as to what possible reason this original TrueCrypt developer feels a fork would be impossible? Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure VeraCrypt is a fork, and we are working on a fork, so...either I'm missing some crucial point, am taking crazy pills, or that original TrueCrypt developer has a very questionable definition of "impossible". Alain -----Original Message----- From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 12:23 To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ciphershed] TrueCrypt Author Claims That Forking Is Impossible http://it.slashdot.org/story/14/06/19/145219/truecrypt-author-claims-that-forking-is-impossible From slashdot: http://it.slashdot.org/story/14/06/19/145219/truecrypt-author-claims-that-forkin g-is-impossible http://pastebin.com/RS0f8gwn On a request from Matthew Green to fork the TrueCrypt code, the author answers that this is impossible. He says that this might be no good idea, because the code needs a rewrite, but he allows to use the existing code as a reference. "I am sorry, but I think what you're asking for here is impossible. I don't feel that forking TrueCrypt would be a good idea, a complete rewrite was something we wanted to do for a while. I believe that starting from scratch wouldn't require much more work than actually learning and understanding all of truecrypts current codebase. I have no problem with the source code being used as reference." -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.