That's exactly the kind of thinking we need on this project. On 09/06/2014 20:23, Alain Forget wrote: > For what it's worth, I think replies at the top make the most sense, since > readers can see what the most recent comment immediately, and in the > (relatively less frequent) case the reader wants to go through the history, > s/he can then scroll down. Usability-wise, the most frequent use case should > require the least amount of user effort. > > Alain > > -----Original Message----- > From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kyle Marek > Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 15:18 > To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [ciphershed] Re: Social Networking Again > > On 06/09/2014 03:15 PM, Niklas Lemcke - ??? wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 20:10:39 +0100 > PID0 <p1dz3r0@xxxxxxxxx> <mailto:p1dz3r0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > You're not the only one, scrolling does my nut in. > > On 09/06/2014 20:09, Alain Forget wrote: > > Coming from an outsider who's recently realised what > happened with TrueCrypt and wants to keep up on how TC's future develops, If > you're going for transparency, I second keeping discussions to forums and > mailing lists that are public web-accessible and search engine indexed > archives. > > Alain > > P.S. Apologies for replying at the top of the e-mail, > but this is the format I'm used to, and replies at the bottom drive me nuts. > :-P Although again, since I'm an outsider, maybe I should be trying to > conform to this community's standards. > > > > Just edit what you were going to reply to, so it fits nicely :D > > I don't really mind top-posting though. Just feel like this it seems > more... proper? > > > > It would make sense that this is the wanted way of doing it because you can > read the chats chronologically, but the only problem i see is that > Thunderbird automatically puts a little space at the top and sets your carat > there, as if you're supposed to type from the top. > > > ________________________________ > > > At the time of sending this message, I have not been contacted by any > government official or worker regarding my participation in CipherShed or any > related project. I have not been asked to supply any information to them that > may be used to impersonate me nor have I been asked to aid the government or > it's officials or workers in modifying part of CipherShed or any related > project. I am not aware of any of my property or anything regarding me being > bugged, searched, or compromised in any way. Anything that accepts PGP > encryption or signing should have been cryptographically secured with my PGP > key. > > > -- -- At the time of writing, no warrants have been served to me, nor am I under any legal compulsion concerning the CipherShed project. I do not know of any searches of seizures of my assets.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
