[ciphershed] Re: Social Networking Again
- From: "Alain Forget" <aforget@xxxxxxx>
- To: <ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 15:23:14 -0400
For what it's worth, I think replies at the top make the most sense, since
readers can see what the most recent comment immediately, and in the
(relatively less frequent) case the reader wants to go through the history,
s/he can then scroll down. Usability-wise, the most frequent use case should
require the least amount of user effort.
Alain
-----Original Message-----
From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Kyle Marek
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 15:18
To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ciphershed] Re: Social Networking Again
On 06/09/2014 03:15 PM, Niklas Lemcke - ??? wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 20:10:39 +0100
PID0 <p1dz3r0@xxxxxxxxx> <mailto:p1dz3r0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You're not the only one, scrolling does my nut in.
On 09/06/2014 20:09, Alain Forget wrote:
Coming from an outsider who's recently realised what
happened with TrueCrypt and wants to keep up on how TC's future develops, If
you're going for transparency, I second keeping discussions to forums and
mailing lists that are public web-accessible and search engine indexed archives.
Alain
P.S. Apologies for replying at the top of the e-mail,
but this is the format I'm used to, and replies at the bottom drive me nuts.
:-P Although again, since I'm an outsider, maybe I should be trying to conform
to this community's standards.
Just edit what you were going to reply to, so it fits nicely :D
I don't really mind top-posting though. Just feel like this it seems
more... proper?
It would make sense that this is the wanted way of doing it because you can
read the chats chronologically, but the only problem i see is that Thunderbird
automatically puts a little space at the top and sets your carat there, as if
you're supposed to type from the top.
________________________________
At the time of sending this message, I have not been contacted by any
government official or worker regarding my participation in CipherShed or any
related project. I have not been asked to supply any information to them that
may be used to impersonate me nor have I been asked to aid the government or
it's officials or workers in modifying part of CipherShed or any related
project. I am not aware of any of my property or anything regarding me being
bugged, searched, or compromised in any way. Anything that accepts PGP
encryption or signing should have been cryptographically secured with my PGP
key.
Other related posts:
