[ciphershed] Re: Requiring GPG Signatures on Git Commits

  • From: Kyle Marek <psppsn96@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:57:54 -0400

On 06/12/2014 04:53 PM, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
> Obviously, I'm "pro-signing." Does everyone else feel the same? Or
> should we drop the requirement to sign every commit?
I also agree with signing all commits, it's another layer of security to
prevent a hole.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At the time of sending this message, I have not been contacted by
any government official or worker regarding my participation in
CipherShed or any related project. I have not been asked to supply any
information to them that may be used to impersonate me nor have I been
asked to aid the government or it's officials or workers in modifying
part of CipherShed or any related project. I am not aware of any of my
property or anything regarding me being bugged, searched, or compromised
in any way. Anything that accepts PGP encryption or signing should have
been cryptographically secured with my PGP key.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Other related posts: