On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 07:19:52 +0100 Pid Zero <p1dz3r0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > *Adjusts tinfoil hat* > > Some valid concerns (& answers), I'm curious who you think the mole is. > > We'll never eliminate risk entirely but we can make it unrealisticlly > difficult for a TLA to do any real damage. Interesting indeed. But I gues you won't blurt that out here on the mailing list. > > On Friday, July 4, 2014, Bill Cox <waywardgeek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > I had so much fun writing the post, I thought maybe you would enjoy > > reading it: > > > > https://forum.truecrypt.ch/t/safeguards-against-nsa-infiltration/185/5 > > > > Bill > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTtiN8AAoJEL9an3rWhBk+IfgQAKUzvkkZDQmV+WYZce4s1mCO > > vDKfJPqcXrC6yOtzSp4ubcjPPjPuEY4PXr9hHMpe4FVB5gMkIY5e+PLqWwh5r1eu > > KJ2GxGb7Btr0+WxnOmJ53XBxG1kv9osizMvBAZ8zG62uX/S+JE3GR0CZ338SoYyz > > BEiaG0oX7r6oSNBfmf4w5SQN9tMLDSfcZh7GjN8F+YOseNfI/Kwoq9vQeDOQF2z2 > > 70z9WIE0BhQXe4DoOlBKmS16IAfaWJb1briG3l/zF7UeeUUmxlUbDdmpYlUcx479 > > bwcVgkMPuFRpVXem8F3fMpXGB9M1f7WSP29mc1AOQGNYFagvTVKRNpfWFX4+fQDF > > VMZUDW8jhK09MF//xabNr4pjJ3tsZDVbx961ghql2umxF8RRAs+CgRVhDg8vHaQt > > 2WgrRxZNbO1fNXXF+Pknr1TRSpySo9PtP7KhiolE7eOhKBgPL29Jy4j9sCYD7oBv > > rTaUEqjvOEFGcItNxR5DN6mRl8/311RIFbK8KJspXb8QsstI7Y4/olkQFfdCyM3h > > I9qCuX31o2tBuaPxDXPbKhJP2Ep3jYUP40/JVIZHt3mlBIumjZdIV5KFtR3bXNJM > > Zy6nygSGupdEz6QcVLTiR0FITB21Ylj211Um5NWgi8K1783Ebll9GsC2/v9b9Z/0 > > ttxO0bVzV6tHWYbgGLlS > > =3T0D > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > -- Niklas - 林樂寬
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
