[ciphershed] Re: Compiling on Windows: Include Prereqs?
- From: "Alain Forget" <aforget@xxxxxxx>
- To: <ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:37:45 -0400
The resulting binary could (and mostly likely would?) be different, and so no
one could tell whether or not we added anything to the source between the last
known pre-compiled TrueCrypt 7.1a binaries and our own TrueCrypt 7.1a binaries,
and thus no one would be able to say with certainty that we started our
development precisely where TrueCrypt 7.1a left off.
Alain
-----Original Message-----
From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Kyle Marek
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 15:30
To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ciphershed] Re: Compiling on Windows: Include Prereqs?
On 06/12/2014 03:24 PM, Alain Forget wrote:
I'm guessing because that's the compiler that was used for building TC
originally. Basically, there's value in replicating the original build process
as closely as possible before we start doing things differently.
What would be so different if we used a newer compiler?
________________________________
At the time of sending this message, I have not been contacted by any
government official or worker regarding my participation in CipherShed or any
related project. I have not been asked to supply any information to them that
may be used to impersonate me nor have I been asked to aid the government or
it's officials or workers in modifying part of CipherShed or any related
project. I am not aware of any of my property or anything regarding me being
bugged, searched, or compromised in any way. Anything that accepts PGP
encryption or signing should have been cryptographically secured with my PGP
key.
Other related posts:
