[ciphershed] Re: Ciphershed Brand
- From: Karen Palen <karenpalensl@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 11:15:01 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thank you, I wish I g\had had the time to do that research before
running out the door :-(
On 06/08/2014 09:55 AM, Peter Trei wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Karen Palen <karenpalensl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> There is a worldwide set of agreements that cover exactly that situation.
>>
>> I would certainly suggest registering whatever trademark we come up
>> with at the USPTO however.
>>
>> If THEY accept it then everyone else can "pound sand". :-) Trouble is
>> is does cost $$$ My guess is US$2-3K
>>
>
> A quick google and uspto check indicates
> 1. 'ciphershed' is not a registered trademark at this time.
> 2. Registering it as such would cost US$ 500-600 (using legalzoom).
>
> No, I'm not up to fronting that cost at this time.
>
> Having an actual piece of legally enforceable IP such as a trademark gives
> the legal owner an unprecedented level of power over the project. We need
> to proceed carefully.
>
> Peter
>
>
- --
*"Ayn Rand - Philosopher in Chief to the intellectually bankrupt"
Sherlock Holmes*
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
License.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTlKglAAoJEBsFFEeyMjwSdq4H/2lkgSF9rLLaIDSoyBNJRDJ5
AnJkEJv78sadoH0fDdlQskmTbbXEyl+j7mKTvE/i6he9hUeSLlcUy561/PsfLywS
UE3ARLDZ+PGR0KOh7SO3clPJHrFJyksqMFxijimwxtKq7cWSp66+2a5ZME3+SicK
aYAgdD/qhGp/N2ZA2p3iQfKEoDG8KZANhTcfLZwEYilp9v+xivOni+FInaH9waVH
ayQMQdzxmoxEbr+wjNj5rfdjBMwuXSybsE3NHOO/9qckhpjCy90ZO/TMtOUr91mp
dpgjWOUrcJwBoWgtN1tD2LkHe+eJBylfJ1icaFPuUgJqdZ5heSvxXL0QTrOBzG4=
=L7vo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
