[cinemaexp] Re: FYI- Alans rejected post

  • From: Laurie <laurie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cinemaexp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 09:07:39 -0500

Sounds good to me. And, small though it is, Cinema 3 is great for reading subtitles.

Laurie

On 02/03/2016 12:55 PM, Alan Sanborn wrote:

Okay, l’ll put it in 3.

Thanks!

  — Alan

On Feb 3, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Joel Johnson <joel_johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I would agree with Bill on putting it in 3. Having a discussion in the
theater following the film is better than having to move everybody out.
People tend to just keep going or just start talking with one's own friends
and not be part of a group discussion.

        
Joel

-----Original Message-----
From: cinemaexp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cinemaexp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of william jefferson
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 12:05 PM
To: cinemaexp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cinemaexp] Re: FYI- Alans rejected post


I'd go with cinema 3 - any overflow can be accommodated on Sunday.

- Bill

Sent from my iPad

On Feb 3, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Clif Graves <cgraves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Looks like we either have to screen APU in cinema 3 the small one that
everybody hates or have the discussion in the lobby. Film in cinema 3 starts
at 12:50 but at 12:00 in the other two theaters; APU is 1 hour 46 minutes so
there is barely time for an introduction. Whatcha think?
--
   Clif Graves Consulting
   cgraves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -http://www.clifgraves.com
   Serving clients throughout the United States with:
   * Fund Raising / Management / Work flow consulting
   * Custom FileMaker software development
   * ServicePoint HMIS support
   * WordPress site development and hosting







Other related posts: