Also my expierience is that: Dos will run for seemingly forever.(I wtill have a 286 @ 12Mhz that is running right now & has had no hardware failures except for a 3.5" floppy drive that went bad) Currently it has been running straight for at least a week. Windows 3.1 rarely locks up but the system resources run low after a while of constant running. So it has to be rebooted every few days. Windows 95 will lock-up more often than win 3.1 but it's system resources will not disapear as quick. I would say I could run it a weeek before it hung-up. & then theres Windows 98se posibly the most crash prone os I have ever used. Although that may be because I put a lot more stress on the comp with 98se. It does good if it will run for 24hours without locking up or needing to be rebooted. Realy makes me mad. LinuxI never have used linux but I have been temted to install it on my Pentium 120 with 16mb of ram but I dont know how fast it would be the dificuly etc. The only real reason I would install linux would be touse that computer as a file server. Later, John On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 <vakko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > My experience: > > DOS - will run "forever" > Win3.x - can be run ~48 hours, with gentle treatment. > Recommend daily cycling. > Win95 - CAN be run a full week.. just don't expect it. > (I should note I do a LOT of 16bit DOS-box work > with this, yet need 95 for the job, so take that > into account.) > W2k - Hasn't crashed on me yet, have had 30+ runtimes, not > longer due to my needing to change hardware, etc. > Linux - saw it "crash" a couple times..always due to > hardware issues. ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. To unsubscribe, send a message to listar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe calmira_tips" in the body. OR visit http://freelists.dhs.org