Erwin Dokter wrote: > I am currently experimenting with a DOSLFN driver, that now comes with a > Windows 386 driver. So 4.0 will finally some (some) LFN support. > I have noticed that Caldera DR-DOS v7.03 (the DOS I use) has an undocumented executable called DRFAT32.EXE. Its help argument returns this information: ---- DRFAT32 R1.00 Redirector Extension for FAT32 Partitions Copyright (c) 1997,1998 Caldera, Inc. All rights reserved. DRFAT32 [/Help|/?] [/D:<driver>] [/F:<files>] [/L:<letter>] [/M:<buffers>] [/V] /D:driver name of FAT32 installable device driver(s) (default is FAT32XXX) /F:value number of file handles to allocate (value = 5..99, default is 20) /L:drive specifies start drive letter (default is first unused drive) /M:value number of buffers to allocate (value = 1..64, default is 48) /V print out debug information during initialization ---- My system is fully 16-bit, so I've never had occasion to experiment with it. Given the /V argument though, it is clearly some sort of driver intended to interface with FAT32. Lacking an installed "FAT32XXX" driver, it doesn't do anything on my machine; I tried that. Beyond this, I can't tell much about it specifically; except that examining the raw file with List seems to indicate that it must also be run with 512 (??)byte sectors [the questioned characters are not alphabetical] -- apparently that's the text for outputting an error message. It's a PKLite file, so not much else in it is intelligible in readable English. I'm not very competent with Debug, so I haven't tried checking it out with that. Is it possible though that it might be useful in your LFN effort? There is the question of its legal status, too, I suppose. DR-DOS has had a highly metamorphic, uncertain history -- including in and out, in and out of abandonware, etc. At the present, I'd certainly call it abandonware. Based on the current lack of support and contact-ability, I find it *solidly* in the abandoned camp. It seems to have evaporated in that regard. That's the shape of this man's opinion anyway. But if I'm wrong, and if it did turn out to be useable in your effort, it would be a shame to have it shot down by bored legal-beagles who suddenly "discover" activity related to it, despite the fact that nothing involving monetary exchange whatsoever is associated with Calmira. Who knows, of course, what can happen when lawyers with excess time on their hands catch wind of a thing, even if the real world around you and me is totally indifferent to their inanity? Still, if it's truly abandoned (or for that matter, if it's not and Caldera decided [assuming they still exist and are capable of decision-making] that they actually liked the idea), AND if it works ... In any case, I thought this might be food for thought if nothing else. Here's to success, Erwin, as your effort proceeds. Regards, Norm Finch -- "The chief virtue that language can have is clearness." - Hippocrates -- Peace. Write well. Do good work. -- -- To unsubscribe, send a message to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe calmira_tips" in the body. OR visit //freelists.org