Catia compares to acad/icad in a similar way to oranges and elephants... Acad is a drafting package and they've added some boolean solid capabilities to it... Catia/Pro/Engineer/Unigraphics, SolidWorks are parametric, feature based modelling systems. This meaning that you can make changes to the dimensions and design intent that you've built into the models. This approach much easier than a boolean based modelling system. From the model, whether it be a single component or assembly of components, the drawing views and dimensions are generated automatically... when changes are made to the parts or assemblies, the drawing automatically reflects these changes. There are many more capabilities, this is only a very basic explanation of the capabilities... Have a look at: http://www.dsweb.com http://www.solidworks.com http://www.ptc.com Regards, David1 >From: Robert Davis <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Reply-To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [cad-linux] Re: Pro/E and CATIA >Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:26:57 -0600 > > >I'd be more interested in knowing how CATIA compares to ACAD/ICAD. > >Robin Rowe wrote: > > >Anyone who can give an overview of Pro/E and CATIA? Why would someone >choose > >one over the other? Are there other packages I should also be aware of? > > _________________________________________________________________ Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com