> IMO if a company doesn't port rendering from NT they're dead. At least in the Architectural fields, most people use 3DStudio or = Form-Z, and it's really uncommon to see someone with a renderfarm = set-up- unless they just do graphics work. However, there is more and = more interest from people about using the spare cycles of their = network's machines for rendering as well as the desire for better = realism in the renderings. I'm trying to learn how to use Radiance, and when I was talking to the = upper management and the IT director here at this firm they were all = amazed to learn that we could set up a renderfarm for Radiance, using = Linux, for just the cost of labor of set-up. Seeing that we have a = couple of lower-end computers sitting around, we have everything we need = except the 'know-how' :). Most Architects are only familiar with the expensive solutions because = of the marketing backing them up; however more and more architects I = talk to (thinking of me as their computer-savvy friend, how's also an = architect) are looking for cheaper solutions for their CAD and rendering = software. If you add together AutoDesk's current 'vision' of how one is = supposed to work with their products, which is design in Studio ($1000), = port to ADT/Revit ($4,000), Render in VIZ ($3,000), and hold it all = together with Buzzsaw (monthly fee) the costs add up so fast it makes = your head spin. Now I know that you don't need all of those packages to work, but still; = once a Linux version, or better yet, a open-source version of at least = something like AutoCAD/IntelliCAD or at best something like Revit, I = think a lot of Architects will start to migrate to Linux; for most of us = are poor. :) But I think the more people hear about the benefits of Linux/BSD/OSX = whatever, and see the money they can save, we'll see a lot more = architects using Linux. Jeffrey McGrew=20