[cad-linux] Re: CAD with server/client architecture
- From: phrostie <pfrostie@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 06:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
Will do.
please check back with us from time to time.
as i had mentioned before in the future it might be nice to split this
list into a cad-linux-user and a cad-linux-dev. at the moment we really don't
have enough traffic to justify this.
and although all the database discussion is a little over my head as well it
does keep my brain from going dead. i've restarted reading InventorMentor,
again.
--- "Morgan, Brian" <bmorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> Please remove me. I joined on a whim, and find the depth of dicussion way
> over my head.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian Morgan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: phrostie [mailto:pfrostie@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 13 May 2003 08:34
> To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cad-linux] Re: CAD with server/client architecture
>
>
>
> you can go to www.freelists.org and login and remove your self.
> if you have problems let me know and i can do it for you.
>
> sorry you're leaving.
>
> --- "Morgan, Brian" <bmorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Sir,
> >
> > Some time ago I left my name on this newsgroup, but now would like to be
> > removed. I don't even remember the web address. If you could direct me I
> > would really appreciate it.
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eric Wilhelm [mailto:ewilhelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 12 May 2003 20:25
> > To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [cad-linux] Re: CAD with server/client architecture
> >
> >
> >
> > > The following was supposedly scribed by
> > > Lee Fickenscher
> > > on Monday 12 May 2003 06:29 pm:
> >
> > >OpenCASCADE has some type of public license, but it is not GPL. I've
> > >read the license, but all such legaleese mystifies me. I'm not sure what
> > >gotchas lurk in all the mumbo jumbo.
> >
> > I've just read through it, and it sounds really similar to the GPL, but
> they
> >
> > don't clearly define "derivative work" as well as the GPL, so it looks
> like
> > the real show-stopper with using this to build the kernel would be in
> > getting
> > commercial support (which would be beneficial to the momentum of the
> system
> > since this would make it possible for draftsmen to switch without a
> learning
> >
> > curve (switching office apps is one thing, but switching cad apps is
> nearly
> > impossible for the old hands)).
> >
> > I'd like to see some commercial products which are using openCascade,
> which
> > would help evaluate the license from a legal standpoint (not that I'm a
> > lawyer, but I play one on the internet:)
> >
> > I haven't really looked at it from a technical standpoint. This would
> also
> > be
> > (of course) important. Any comments on the technical merits?
> >
> > --Eric
> >
>
>
> =====
> phrostie
> Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of DOS
> and danced the skies on Linux silvered wings.
> http://pfrostie.freeservers.com/cad-tastrafy/
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/cad-linux
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> http://search.yahoo.com
>
=====
phrostie
Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of DOS
and danced the skies on Linux silvered wings.
http://pfrostie.freeservers.com/cad-tastrafy/
//www.freelists.org/webpage/cad-linux
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
Other related posts:
