[cad-linux] Re: CAD with server/client architecture
- From: "Morgan, Brian" <bmorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 08:35:58 -0400
Dear Sir,
Please remove me. I joined on a whim, and find the depth of dicussion way
over my head.
Thanks,
Brian Morgan
-----Original Message-----
From: phrostie [mailto:pfrostie@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 13 May 2003 08:34
To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cad-linux] Re: CAD with server/client architecture
you can go to www.freelists.org and login and remove your self.
if you have problems let me know and i can do it for you.
sorry you're leaving.
--- "Morgan, Brian" <bmorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> Some time ago I left my name on this newsgroup, but now would like to be
> removed. I don't even remember the web address. If you could direct me I
> would really appreciate it.
>
> Brian
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Wilhelm [mailto:ewilhelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 12 May 2003 20:25
> To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cad-linux] Re: CAD with server/client architecture
>
>
>
> > The following was supposedly scribed by
> > Lee Fickenscher
> > on Monday 12 May 2003 06:29 pm:
>
> >OpenCASCADE has some type of public license, but it is not GPL. I've
> >read the license, but all such legaleese mystifies me. I'm not sure what
> >gotchas lurk in all the mumbo jumbo.
>
> I've just read through it, and it sounds really similar to the GPL, but
they
>
> don't clearly define "derivative work" as well as the GPL, so it looks
like
> the real show-stopper with using this to build the kernel would be in
> getting
> commercial support (which would be beneficial to the momentum of the
system
> since this would make it possible for draftsmen to switch without a
learning
>
> curve (switching office apps is one thing, but switching cad apps is
nearly
> impossible for the old hands)).
>
> I'd like to see some commercial products which are using openCascade,
which
> would help evaluate the license from a legal standpoint (not that I'm a
> lawyer, but I play one on the internet:)
>
> I haven't really looked at it from a technical standpoint. This would
also
> be
> (of course) important. Any comments on the technical merits?
>
> --Eric
>
=====
phrostie
Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of DOS
and danced the skies on Linux silvered wings.
http://pfrostie.freeservers.com/cad-tastrafy/
//www.freelists.org/webpage/cad-linux
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
Other related posts:
