Jimmy C. Chau wrote: > BTW, our page claims to be "Valid HTML 4.01", but if anyone actually follows > that link to validate (I did), w3.org tells us that the HTML is *invalid*. > If we can, we should remove that claim of validation until the page is valid > (as someone who actually takes the effort to make compliant webpages, I > care). > This been one of my biggest annoyances with moinmoin development. I've brought this up before, and there's been open bug report since 2006, but they still don't fix it (and continue to add more pieces with xhtml short tags). I'll just take the validator link off for now. Thanks for the heads up. -Jim Bardin _________ BU LUG: http://lug.bu.edu. To unsubscribe, email bulug-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field.