[bookshare-discuss] e: Re: Publisher Quality books
- From: Brenda Mueller <brendin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:52:35 -0200
Now, friends,
I doubt that Bookshare wants a bunch of books inaccessable to us.
What would be the point of that? Could it be that NIMAC just
meant well but caused a whole bit of trouble? Perhaps NIMAC is
well meaning. Why can't those books be converted to BRF in
perfect print and all? What is this NIMAC thing anyway? Can
someone enlighten me? John Glass wouldn't have agreed to anything
to make most books inaccessable. That much I'm sure of.
As I said, what would be the point? If I could only read one book
out of 4 or 10, how long would I keep my subscription? It goes
without saying that every book should be accessable to us to
read.
Brenda Mueller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Roderick" <rickrod@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date sent: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:04:05 -0500
Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Publisher Quality books
I am sorry that Bookshare had to get into this kind of agreement
with NIMAC.
In an ideal world, we would be able to read any book on the site.
That being said, if they could have on the quality the word Nimac
somewhere,
it would keep us from wasting our time trying to go to something
we can't
access.
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank Email to
bookshare-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the Subject line. To
get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself
in the subject line.
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank Email to
bookshare-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the Subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts:
- » [bookshare-discuss] e: Re: Publisher Quality books
