[bookshare-discuss] Re: Three To Get Deadly
- From: talmage@xxxxxxxxxx
- To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:17:31 -0500
Hi Sue,
Thanks, but Bookshare shouldn't have listed me as the submitter, I was just
validating it. I'm not 100percent sure, but I think Sharon was the submitter.
Dave
At 10:54 AM 12/3/2004, you wrote:
>Hi Dave,
>
>Well, take heart! The copy I got from the download page,,,, which was
>yours, was excellent. I checked about page breaks, etc., so I got the
>uncorrupted copy and have submitted it. I gave it an excellent rating, as
>did the auto analyzer, and I said on my note that it is far better than the
>other copy, which is true. So hopefully we won't see it on the download
>page again..
>
>Please let me know if you get a note that it has been approved. It should
>definitely replace the one in the collection.
>
>Sue
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <talmage@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 7:46 AM
>Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Three To Get Deadly
>
>
>Hi Sue,
>
>I'm afraid to admit that the prolonged edit phase was my fault.
>The book in question is an improved copy of the book already on
>Bookshare. I had been keeping it in order to try and correct the page
>breaks, which are quite messed up on both the existing copy as well as on
>the improved version. I lost heart on the project and let it go when my
>copy became corrupted, so that I found myself back at square one.
>
>Dave
>
>At 06:31 PM 12/2/2004, you wrote:
>
> >Hi Dave,
> >
> >I just caught one that has bounced, bounced, bounced for you... Is anyone
> >else working on it? There is one in the collection submmitted by Carrie
> >and it says excellent, like the bounced one.. So do I compare the two or
> >has someone else already done that? Thanks.
> >
> >Sue S.
Other related posts:
