[bookshare-discuss] Re: Three To Get Deadly

  • From: "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:54:05 -0600




Hi Dave,

Well, take heart!  The copy I got from the download page,,,, which was
yours, was excellent.  I checked about page breaks, etc., so I got the
uncorrupted copy and have submitted it.  I gave it an excellent rating, as
did the auto analyzer, and I said on my note that it is far better than the
other copy, which is true.  So hopefully we won't see it on the download
page again..

Please let me know if you get a note that it has been approved.  It should
definitely replace the one in the collection.

Sue

----- Original Message -----
From: <talmage@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 7:46 AM
Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Three To Get Deadly


Hi Sue,

I'm afraid to admit that the prolonged edit phase was my fault.
The book in question is an improved copy of the book already on
Bookshare.  I had been keeping it in order to try and correct the page
breaks, which are quite messed up on both the existing copy as well as on
the improved version.  I lost heart on the project and let it go when my
copy became corrupted, so that I found myself back at square one.

Dave

At 06:31 PM 12/2/2004, you wrote:

>Hi Dave,
>
>I just caught one that has bounced, bounced, bounced for you...  Is anyone
>else working on it?  There is one in the collection  submmitted by Carrie
>and it says excellent, like the bounced one..  So do I compare the two or
>has someone else already done that?  Thanks.
>
>Sue S.







Other related posts: