Oh, I agree with this absoultely, for the record. I have never minded correcting as I read; I figure that's what I'd be doing if I scanned the book myself ... but when passages are unreadable ... well ... it makes one a bit ... peeved. ----- Original Message ----- From: "J.M." <inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 3:54 PM Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Do these books get read before being submitted? > Hi, Cindy. Well, I read over half the book before I hit all that junk. Some > junk is acceptable, at least to me, but when it interferes with the book, > the text is interrupted and, in a lot of cases, totally not there, that's > when I got frustrated. I did come across some junk characters I deleted and > some incorrect words, but I deleted the junk in that case and fixed the > words, but when I hit all that junk where it was impossible to tell what was > supposed to be there...well, that was that. Take care. > Julie Morales > Email and Windows/MSN Messenger: > inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > When God puts a tear in your eye, it is because He wants to put a rainbow in > your heart. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 3:32 PM > Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Do these books get read before being > submitted? > > > Julie, > > Hopefully you read my reply to boomerdad, but in case > not -- be sure to notify Jesse that the book is > unreadable all the way through. > > BTW, Jesse -- when a member downloads a book from the > collection that he/she can't enjoy, do they get a > credit for the book, so it doesn't count against their > limit of 50 (or whatever?) > > Cindy > --- "J.M." <inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I can relate to this. Last night, I was reading one > > of the Left Behind > > books. I was over halfway done with the book when I > > encountered pure junk. > > Nothing made sense. I kept scrolling through, trying > > to find where I left > > off or at least somewhere where the text started > > making sense, but no luck. > > I was so frustrated! It irritates me when you get > > into a book and not > > realize it has some junk pages until you've already > > gotten into it. I guess > > I'll be downloading this copy from Web braille, as I > > know they have the > > whole series, but it is frustrating. Take care. > > Julie Morales > > Email and Windows/MSN Messenger: > > inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > When God puts a tear in your eye, it is because He > > wants to put a rainbow in > > your heart. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "boomerdad" <boomerdad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 3:12 AM > > Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Do these books get read > > before being submitted? > > > > > > After having some difficulty scanning Wizard and > > Glass by Stephen King (I > > think Openbook doesn't like scanning big books when > > set to scan page layout > > elements, but that's a whole other topic for another > > list), I downloaded WIG > > from Bookshare and began to read. My first finding > > was that the entire book > > was double-spaced. I was a bit irritated, but I > > figured well, maybe there > > was a problem either in converting the book to the > > Bookshare format, or > > maybe when Openbook loaded it as an .ark file > > something happened. I > > figured, well, I can just manually fix this as I > > read. No big. Then I came > > up on a page that is completely and totally garbled, > > beyond any ability to > > recognize what the text is supposed to be. There > > are ^ symbols all over the > > place, and other oddities. Granted, the book is > > over 600 pages long, and > > that may be the only page like this ... I stopped > > reading in disgust and > > opted to try re-scanning this mammoth with Openbook. > > I have yet to do so; > > that's tomorrow's t > > hree-plus-hour task. My question is: If the person > > read this before > > submitting it, why not re-scan the offending > > page(s)? And if the submitting > > person didn't read it before submitting ... why > > submit something you haven't > > read yourself? It just seems like an awfully big > > leap of faith to do this; > > I've done it twice, and both times I was, > > thankfully, given the opportunity > > to make "corrections" in the form of rescanning > > pages that had > > unintelligible material. Once I was able to take > > advantage of the > > opportunity, once I wasn't ... but it taught me a > > very valuable lesson, as > > was reinforced by my Wizard and Glass experience. > > Besides, if you read > > something before submitting it, you get a chance to > > edit out the errors of a > > scan and submit a near-perfect to perfect copy of > > your book. > > It occurs to me as I write this that maybe the > > offending page could've been > > caused by Openbook somehow, as I've encountered > > garbled pages like this when > > scanning with Finereader from time to time. I find > > this unlikely, though, > > since so far as I know, Openbook merely reads from > > the Daisy-formatted book, > > and doesn't "convert" it to anything. > > > > The only possible objection to this > > read-before-submitting thing that comes > > readily to mind is "Well, if we did that, many fewer > > books would be > > available," to which I reply that while this is > > true, the quality of said > > books would be more consistent, more likely than > > not, and would lead to many > > more satisfying reading experiences. I submit many > > more books to > > Bookshare.org than I personally download, mainly > > because I've found from my > > experiences that downloading a book from Bookshare > > is a rather hit-and-miss > > experience. > > > > I also want to hasten to add that I am not in any > > way flaming the individual > > who submitted Wizard and Glass. As I said, I've had > > this happen myself to > > two of my submissions, so the question is more or > > less hypothetical; I was > > merely relating my experience, which happened to > > involve that particular > > book. > > > > If this post has had a harsh edge to it, I assure > > you it's not intentional. > > I am frustrated, and that has probably carried over > > into my writing, despite > > my attempts to prevent it from doing so. I already > > have scanned the book > > twice unsuccessfully because of the affore-mentioned > > page-layout problem in > > OpenBook, and the idea of scanning it *again* is ... > > well ... frustrating. > > I thought about just trying to re-scan any > > problematic pages ... but the > > Bookshare pages and Openbook's page divisions don't > > line up, so I'd have to > > do all sorts of cutting and pasting and deleting and > > ... yikes...! I think > > if my problem had just been with garbled pages, I'd > > do it, but since I would > > have to delete all those blank lines as I read the > > Bookshare version ... > > I'll try scanning it one. more. time. with the > > page-layout feature turned > > off and hope for better results. > > > > If nothing else, thanks for listening to (reading) > > me vent. I realize > > Bookshare is a voluntary program, and its existence > > is a wonderful thing; > > that's why I've joined it, and that's why I submit > > books I read. I just > > wish that when downloading a book to read from > > Bookshare, I could be more > > secure in the knowledge that I won't have to worry > > about encountering > > incomprehensible garbage that makes me guess at what > > occurred in passages of > > a book. > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > >